AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Cyberhaven › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to Cyberhaven, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 474 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where Cyberhaven holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 474 answers that did not name Cyberhaven, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Insider risk management

Security operations. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Cyberhaven is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessCyberhaven holds 3 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name Cyberhaven; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

11 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketCyberhaven is #7 of 12 here at 2% of first choices, 10 labels.

Eighty of the eighty-four answers did not name Cyberhaven; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those eighty answers, twenty-one products in all, the eight most named:

13 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseCyberhaven is #8 of 13 here at 4% of first choices, 10 labels.

Seventy-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Cyberhaven; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-nine answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:

8 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Data loss prevention

Security operations. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when Cyberhaven is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessCyberhaven holds 6 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name Cyberhaven; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-three answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

7 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketCyberhaven is #10 of 15 here at 0% of first choices, 12 labels.

Seventy-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Cyberhaven; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-nine answers, twenty products in all, the eight most named:

12 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseCyberhaven is #4 of 11 here at 6% of first choices, 19 labels.

Sixty-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name Cyberhaven; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those sixty-nine answers, eight products in all:

The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled Cyberhaven neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named Cyberhaven only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from Cyberhaven's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of Cyberhaven was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.