| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 22% | 1 of 84 | 3% | 36 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 1 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management if you are already Microsoft centric and need compliance-focused detection, investigation and policy controls.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Insider risk · scale prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit in these results is Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management *if your company already has Microsoft 365 E5*” Perplexity Sonar · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice
“If your company is already paying for Microsoft 365 E5 licenses, Microsoft Purview is your default best choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice
“Best budget-conscious choice: Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management—if your company already uses Microsoft 365.” GPT-6 Luna · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Potential concerns: Limited visibility outside the Microsoft ecosystem; weaker AI intent reasoning; partial ecosystem coverage.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Insider risk · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 118 of the 121 answers that named Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management and are not a share of its labels.
382 of the 485 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: microsoft.com/bg-bg/windows/comprehensive-security, microsoft.com/bg-bg/windows/extended-security-updates, microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/everyday-online-security, microsoft.com/en-us/microsoft-365/content-management-solutions, microsoft.com/de-de/windows/tips/security. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management first in Insider risk management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.