Small business▲+4Since September 2026: 0% → 4%, +4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
4%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 15 → 5 of 77
1 category · RankedminiOrange DLP
23Judge labels
2First choices
0Negative labels
9 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in DLP for small business buyers
Rank 21 of 89 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 7 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business6 of 82
4%15 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market21 of 89
0%7 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named miniOrange DLP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 0% | 21 of 89 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, miniOrange DLP held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DLP · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 7 → 19 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLP | 4% | 0% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 7 → 21 of 89 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated miniOrange DLP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated miniOrange DLP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct5 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labels1
Comparative3 labelsNone
Budget-constrained5 labels1
Scale-constrained1 labelNone
Negative2 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative23 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Highlighted for multi-channel coverage at SMB-accessible pricing and deployment speed” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · direct prompt · alternative
“CurrentWare or miniOrange for SMB-accessible pricing with solid feature sets” Kimi K2 · DLP · direct prompt · alternative
“miniOrange is described as SMB-accessible with low-to-medium pricing.” Perplexity Sonar · DLP · budget prompt · alternative
“Miniorange - Best for SMBs and mid-market companies” Llama 4 Maverick · DLP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as miniOrange DLP, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and miniOrange DLP was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as miniOrange DLP, over the 23 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and miniOrange DLP was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named miniOrange DLP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 23 of the 23 answers that named miniOrange DLP and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
miniorange.comYour site23
currentware.com20
kickidler.com15
forcepoint.com14
spotsaas.com13
underdefense.com13
strac.io12
learn.g2.com11
aimultiple.com9
checkpoint.com7
114 of the 137 domain citations in answers naming miniOrange DLP came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
miniorange.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, miniOrange DLP takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
miniorange.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, miniOrange DLP takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “data loss prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “data loss prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 10 a month (“miniorange dlp”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 0 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 48,290 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,274 · 505 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 5,591
- Paid Google search
- 2 searches its ads show for, about 13 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 21 of 89 in DLP
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Purview DLP
- First choices
- 2 across its categories
- Named in
- 23 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 23 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on miniorange.com
7,740
subdomains included
Content
3,274
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,057
Product · Integration
114 · 937
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,755 | 0 | 2026-06-18 | ||
| Comparison | 142 | 3 | 2026-08-26 | UEM, ZTNA | |
| Conference or event | 133 | 2 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 133 | undated | SIEM | ||
| Case study | 60 | 0 | 2024-06-21 | ||
| Report or ebook | 31 | 0 | 2025-11-07 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 11 | 3 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Template or tool | 7 | 0 | 2026-05-25 | ||
| News or press | 2 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-22Webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-08Govern how ai agents access your store webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-08-26Revoke access vs remediation ticket comparison
- 2026-08-21Shopify api scopes vs ai agent permissions comparison
- 2026-08-20Okta jira cloud user group provisioning conference or event
- 2026-08-20Jira cloud azure ad user group provisioning conference or event
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page miniorange.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as miniOrange DLP
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as miniOrange DLP; a claim can dispute any of them.
miniOrange 3Miniorange 2
Follow miniOrange DLP
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
miniOrange DLP is its own company.ShowHide
The company
miniOrange DLP is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Data Loss Prevention (DLP) Prevent unauthorized access to sensitive data.
- For
- Atlassian apps
- Free plan or trial
- Anyone can explore the miniOrange IAM & CIAM Solution without any feature limitations for a period of 30 days. miniorange.com/iam/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 6000 miniorange.com
- Customers named
- BNY MellonNASANahdiJohns Hopkins UniversityWalmartVodafoneHPLeading Indian Brands Trust miniOrange
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, certifications, hosting
What miniOrange DLP's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: miniorange.com, miniorange.com/iam/pricing, miniorange.com/atlassian/security, miniorange.com/products, miniorange.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when miniOrange DLP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as miniOrange DLP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for miniOrange DLP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where miniOrange DLP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name miniOrange DLP, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.