IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Nightfall AI · September 2026 Edition
Nightfall · 1 category · Ranked

Nightfall AI

77Judge labels
10First choices
2Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in DLP for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 84 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 24 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Nightfall AI for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Data loss preventionSecurity operations8%4 of 840%24accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Nightfall AI yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Nightfall AI across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash31004
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast01102
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash04105
Llama 4 Maverick01001
Qwen 3.7 Flash01001
Kimi K212003
GLM 4.7 FlashX01001
MiniMax M2.502002

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels5
Paraphrase11 labels2
Comparative19 labels3not counted in share
Budget-constrained13 labels3
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative14 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative77 labels in all, every segment counted; 10 of the 15 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“1. Nightfall AI – Best for Cloud-First SaaS Companies ... Fastest deployment, minimal security staff | Nightfall AI” Kimi K2 · DLP · direct prompt · first choice
“modern data-lineage and browser-focused DLP tools (e.g., Cyberhaven, Nightfall, Strac, or Next DLP)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · first choice
“Choose Nightfall AI if you are 100% cloud-native, operate heavily on Slack, Jira, and GitHub” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · direct prompt · first choice
“For a limited budget, start with a free plan from Nightfall, Google Cloud DLP, or Box Shield.” Mistral Small · DLP · budget prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Nightfall AI, over the 77 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Nightfall AI was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Purview DLP56 of 7720Not in the top three
Safetica51 of 774Not in the top three
CurrentWare48 of 7718Not in the top three
Forcepoint DLP39 of 773Not in the top three
Netwrix Endpoint Protector39 of 772Not in the top three
Symantec Data Loss Prevention38 of 770Not in the top three
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP19 of 770Not in the top three
Cyberhaven16 of 771Not in the top three
Netskope DLP15 of 771Not in the top three
Strac13 of 772Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Nightfall AI. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 67 of the 77 answers that named Nightfall AI and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com55
gartner.com55
learn.g2.com45
miniorange.com36
underdefense.com34
forcepoint.com29
g2.com26
nightfall.aiYour site23
spotsaas.com23
strac.io23

326 of the 349 domain citations in answers naming Nightfall AI came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Nightfall AI

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Nightfall AI; a claim can dispute any of them.
Nightfall 8
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Nightfall AI's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Nightfall AI, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at nightfall.ai is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack