3 categories · RankedCoro
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 7% | 5 of 84 | 22% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22% | |
| Extended detection and response | Security operations | 2% | 8 of 58 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender XDR at 40% | ▼−5Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 2% | 10 of 89 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview DLP at 46% | ▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Coro across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Coro and Microsoft Purview are highly recommended for small businesses and startups (under 500 employees)” Mistral Small · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice
“For the tightest budget, Coro offers the best balance of features and cost” MiniMax M2.5 · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice
“the strongest fit is usually Coro if you want an SMB-focused XDR platform” Perplexity Sonar · XDR · budget prompt · first choice
“Coro Cybersecurity — *Best Overall for Mid-Market*” Kimi K2 · DLP · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Teramind, Veriato, and Coro/Metomic, which are not recommended for large enterprises due to performance issues or limited features” Llama 4 Maverick · Insider risk · negative prompt · hard negative
“flags Coro/Metomic as SMB-focused SaaS solutions and says they should be avoided for large enterprises” Perplexity Sonar · Insider risk · negative prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Coro, over the 112 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Coro was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 111 of the 112 answers that named Coro and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
307 of the 307 domain citations in answers naming Coro came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
coro.net is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Coro takes 7% of first choices and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 49,500 a month (“coro”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4,833 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 3,791 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,263 · 54 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,458
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 25 across its categories
- Named in
- 112 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 111 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 238 | 12 | 2026-09-24 | EDR, Awareness training | |
| News or press | 63 | 4 | 2026-08-04 | Email security, Awareness training | |
| Glossary or explainer | 38 | 1 | 2026-09-09 | SIEM, Threat intel | |
| Case study | 6 | 2 | 2026-08-17 | ||
| Report or ebook | 5 | 1 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Podcast or video | 4 | 0 | 2025-09-11 | ||
| Conference or event | 3 | 0 | 2025-04-28 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2024-04-01 | ||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2024-07-09 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Lean it security ebook report or ebook
- 2026-09-24Lean it team security gaps blog
- 2026-09-21Inherited security stack blog
- 2026-09-18Scaling security without adding complexity blog
- 2026-09-09What is workspace cybersecurity glossary or explainer
- 2026-09-09How to consolidate your stack blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page coro.net exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Coro
Follow Coro
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Coro is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cybersecurity Made Easy. One Platform. One Dashboard. One AI Agent.
- For
- Lean IT teams, growing organizations, and managed service providers (MSPs)
- Free plan or trial
- Start For Free coro.net/platform
- Certifications
- AAA Ratings from SE Labs for Endpoint Detection & Response (EDR), Email, and Cloud protection
- Customers named
- Topeka Public SchoolsCREAPLUSM-ArmsM6iTMemphis Business AcademyTaos AcademyBrightwater Senior LivingEcosave
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Coro's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: coro.net, coro.net/compliance, coro.net/platform, coro.net/resources/case-studies, coro.net/platform/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Coro's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Coro, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Coro by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Coro is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Coro, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.