Every category where a model named CurrentWare for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	18%	2 of 84	0%	24	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for CurrentWare yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated CurrentWare across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	1	2	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	2	1	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	1	2	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	1	3
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	1	3
MiniMax M2.5	2	0	1	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels6

Paraphrase13 labels5

Comparative9 labels4not counted in share

Budget-constrained17 labels9

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative8 labels5not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative67 labels in all, every segment counted; 20 of the 29 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best overall mid‑market choice: CurrentWare (low cost, easy deployment, solid endpoint/device control) or Microsoft Purview DLP” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

“I'd recommend starting with either Safetica ... or CurrentWare (if budget and ease of use are priorities)” MiniMax M2.5 · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

“CurrentWare and miniOrange are strong choices due to their scalability, ease of use, and value for money” Mistral Small · DLP · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“CurrentWare is a top pick due to its affordability, ease of use, and strong feature set” Mistral Small · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as CurrentWare, over the 67 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CurrentWare was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Safetica57 of 677Compare →

Nightfall AI48 of 678Not in the top three

Microsoft Purview DLP45 of 6716Compare →

Netwrix Endpoint Protector44 of 671Not in the top three

Forcepoint DLP25 of 671Not in the top three

miniOrange19 of 671Not in the top three

Symantec Data Loss Prevention15 of 670Not in the top three

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP8 of 670Not in the top three

Box Shield7 of 671Not in the top three

MyDLP6 of 670Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CurrentWare. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 66 of the 67 answers that named CurrentWare and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.comYour site66

learn.g2.com52

gartner.com49

miniorange.com46

underdefense.com33

consilien.com32

forcepoint.com27

kickidler.com24

g2.com21

safetica.com21

305 of the 371 domain citations in answers naming CurrentWare came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software66

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software52

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-loss-prevention49

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools44

consilien.com/news/best-dlp-solutions-202632

underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions32

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dlp-software25

kickidler.com/reviews/top-best-data-loss-prevention-software-dlp.html24

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as CurrentWare

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CurrentWare; a claim can dispute any of them.

Currentware 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CurrentWare's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CurrentWare, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at currentware.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.