Small business▼−2Since September 2026: 20% → 19%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
19%from 20% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 2 of 77, unchanged
4 categories · RankedCurrentWare
71Judge labels
11First choices
1Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
4Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
19% in DLP for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 89 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 14 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of CurrentWare →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business2 of 82
19%43 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 89
2%14 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprisenot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named CurrentWare for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 2% | 6 of 89 | 0% | 14 | accepted challenger | ▼−16Since September 2026: 18% → 2%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 0% | 65 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% | |
| Digital risk protection | Security operations | 0% | 65 of 86 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by UpGuard BreachSight at 22% | |
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 0% | 42 of 84 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, CurrentWare moved past the floor in one of four categories: DLP, −16 points to 2%. It held within the floor in the other three.
Best category · DLP · by segment
Mid-market▼−16Since September 2026: 18% → 2%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 18% in September 2026
Cleared the floor by 5 pointsRank 2 → 6 of 80
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLP | 18% | 2% | ▼−16Since September 2026: 18% → 2%, −16 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked. | Moved past the floor | Rank 2 → 6 of 89 |
| DSPM | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 105, unchanged |
| DRP | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 65 of 86, unchanged |
| Insider risk | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 42 of 84, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated CurrentWare across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated CurrentWare across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct15 labels3
Paraphrase13 labels1
Comparative10 labels6not counted in share
Budget-constrained22 labels6
Scale-constrained4 labels1
Negative7 labels2not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 11 of the 19 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Lowest Cost & Simplicity | CurrentWare (~$5/user/mo)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · first choice
“CurrentWare being especially practical for businesses that need endpoint DLP, USB control, employee activity visibility, and reporting” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative
“Currentware - Best for endpoint DLP, USB control, workforce visibility, and SMB to mid-market organizations.” Llama 4 Maverick · DLP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“affordable, easy-to-deploy data loss prevention solution specifically designed for small businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · budget prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CurrentWare, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CurrentWare was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as CurrentWare, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and CurrentWare was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named CurrentWare. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 71 of the 71 answers that named CurrentWare and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
currentware.comYour site67
miniorange.com42
kickidler.com39
learn.g2.com38
spotsaas.com34
strac.io29
us.fitgap.com29
aimultiple.com28
g2.com28
underdefense.com26
293 of the 360 domain citations in answers naming CurrentWare came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
currentware.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CurrentWare takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
currentware.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, CurrentWare takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “data loss prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “data loss prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 210 a month (“currentware”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 3 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 15,193 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,778 · 109 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,588
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
2%
rank 6 of 89 in DLP
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Purview DLP
- First choices
- 11 across its categories
- Named in
- 71 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 71 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on currentware.com
433
subdomains included
Content
309
counted in the table below
Documentation
0
Product · Integration
72 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 230 | 88 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Comparison | 28 | 8 | 2026-09-17 | ||
| Case study | 25 | 2 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 10 | 10 | 2026-08-03 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 6 | 6 | 2026-09-28 | ||
| Report or ebook | 4 | 0 | 2026-06-30 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 2 | 2026-08-20 | ||
| News or press | 2 | 1 | 2026-07-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Customer Webinar: Boost Productivity & ROI | CurrentWare webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Customer success story case study
- 2026-09-28Currentware msp webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28MSP Webinar: CurrentWare Product Updates & Market Trends webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-28Web filtering remote hybrid workforces blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page currentware.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as CurrentWare
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as CurrentWare; a claim can dispute any of them.
Currentware 2
Follow CurrentWare
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
CurrentWare is its own company.ShowHide
The company
CurrentWare is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Workforce intelligence for remote, hybrid, and in-office teams
- For
- IT teams
- Price stated
- BrowseReporter starts at $12 USD per user/month, billed annually for SaaS. The CurrentWare suite is priced at $20 USD per user/month. BrowseControl starts at $6 USD per user/month (SaaS and On-prem), AccessPatrol starts at $12 USD per user/month (SaaS and On-prem), and enPowerManager at $6 USD per user/month (SaaS and On-prem). currentware.com
- Starting price
- $12 USD per user/month currentware.com
- Free plan or trial
- fully-functional 14-day free trial period that requires no credit card currentware.com
- Customers named
- The Coding NetworkSessions & Kimball LLPShady MapleFirst Choice HealthVehicle DealershipMedical PracticeFinancial Services IndustryBoston Centerless
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, certifications, hosting
What CurrentWare's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: currentware.com, currentware.com/compliance, currentware.com/products, currentware.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when CurrentWare's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as CurrentWare, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for CurrentWare by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where CurrentWare is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name CurrentWare, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.