Every category where a model named Code42 Incydr for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Insider risk management	Security operations	13%	3 of 84	0%	30	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Code42 Incydr yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Code42 Incydr across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	2	0	3
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	2
Grok 4.20	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	1	1	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	2	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	3	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2
GPT-6 Luna	2	1	0	3
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	3	1	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct16 labels3

Paraphrase12 labels5

Comparative24 labelsNone

Budget-constrained8 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labelsNone

Negative4 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative70 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Start with Code42 Incydr — it's purpose-built for the #1 insider risk in B2B (data/IP exfiltration), deploys quickly, and won't break the budget.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · direct prompt · first choice

“Balanced mid-market pick: Proofpoint or Code42 Incydr for proven detection without overkill” Grok 4.20 · Insider risk · direct prompt · first choice

“Code42 Incydr (now part of Mimecast) is widely considered the standard recommendation.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Insider risk · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“I'd shortlist Mimecast Incydr as the best dedicated insider-risk tool” GPT-6 Luna · Insider risk · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Code42 Incydr, over the 70 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Code42 Incydr was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management48 of 7025Compare →

Teramind43 of 702Compare →

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management33 of 700Compare →

DTEX Systems23 of 702Not among the top eight

DTEX InTERCEPT20 of 702Not among the top eight

Varonis Data Security Platform20 of 700Not among the top eight

Securonix UEBA19 of 700Not among the top eight

Above Security18 of 707Compare →

Coro16 of 703Not among the top eight

Gurucul15 of 700Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Code42 Incydr. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 68 of the 70 answers that named Code42 Incydr and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

insiderisk.io49

gartner.com37

nightfall.ai37

guptadeepak.com32

learn.microsoft.com29

exabeam.com26

riskpublishing.com26

breachsense.com25

teramind.co21

microsoft.com20

302 of the 302 domain citations in answers naming Code42 Incydr came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/insider-risk-management-solutions34

insiderisk.io/research/insider-risk-management-vendor-comparison-202534

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-insider-threat-management-tools-202632

nightfall.ai/blog/top-10-insider-risk-management-products-of-202432

insiderisk.io/research/insider-threat-detection-solutions-technologies-202531

riskpublishing.com/best-insider-threat-management-software-compare26

breachsense.com/blog/insider-threat-detection-software25

insiderisk.io/research/best-insider-risk-management-tools-202625

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

mimecast.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Code42 Incydr takes 13% of first choices and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “insider risk management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “insider risk management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 110 a month (“code42 incydr”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 6 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 148,929 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 12,907 · 1,030 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 56,562
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

75+ ads · 75 text · 21 shown in the last 30 days

First shown April 2025, as MIMECAST NORTH AMERICA, INC., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 38 in the year, 37 before. 45 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

13%

rank 3 of 84 in insider risk

Segment leader

22%

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management

First choices: 8 across its categories
Named in: 70 answers
Its own site cited: in 68 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on mimecast.com

7,780

subdomains included

Content

824

counted in the table below

Documentation

Product · Integration

51 · 7

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	304	3	2026-08-27	Email security, DLP
News or press	235	1	2026-08-03	Email security, XDR
Report or ebook	86	0	2025-09-19	Email security, DLP
Case study	66	0	2025-06-16	Email security, PAM
Webinar or virtual event	55	undated		Email security, DLP
Comparison	32	1	2026-08-27	Email security
Glossary or explainer	30	0	2025-01-23	Email security, MFA
Podcast or video	14	0	2026-04-23	Email security
Conference or event	1	0	2019-09-17
Template or tool	1	undated

Most recent

2026-08-27Prompt injection vs scanner evasion comparison
2026-08-27Email and collaboration threat protection blog
2026-08-20Data compliance and governance blog
2026-08-03News coverage news or press
2026-07-21Security awareness training blog
2026-04-23Cloud security podcast podcast or video

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page mimecast.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name email security (34); 0 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Code42 Incydr

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Code42 Incydr; a claim can dispute any of them.

Code42 Incydr (Mimecast) 3Mimecast Incydr 3Code42 Incydr (now Mimecast) 2Mimecast Incydr (formerly Code42 Incydr) 2Code42 / Incydr 1Code42 / Incydr (by Mimecast) 1Code42 Incydr (by Mimecast) 1

Follow Code42 Incydr

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Code42 Incydr's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Code42 Incydr, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Code42 Incydr by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Code42 Incydr is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Code42 Incydr, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Code42 Incydr is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.

ShowHide

Code42 Incydr is among the products AI models recommend first in Insider risk management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/code42-incydr--insider-risk-management-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Insider risk management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Insider risk management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/code42-incydr--insider-risk-management-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Insider risk management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Insider risk management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer

Show the code

<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/security/insider-risk-management/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/code42-incydr--insider-risk-management-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Insider risk management, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Insider risk management standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.