Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 13% → 15%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
15%from 13% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 of 77, unchanged
3 categories · RankedSafetica
120Judge labels
25First choices
5Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
15% in DLP for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 89 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
2 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 8% of its 26 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Safetica →By buyer segmentStrongest at small business.
Small business3 of 82
15%50 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market2 of 89
15%26 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise29 of 60
0%5 labels
under the label threshold
In dlp · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Safetica for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 15% | 2 of 89 | 8% | 26 | accepted challenger | ▼−3Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 4% | 6 of 105 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% | |
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 2% | 10 of 84 | 0% | 5 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management at 22% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Safetica held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · DLP · by segment
Mid-market▼−3Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
13%from 16% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 80
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 14 → 41 of 55
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DSPM | 0% | 5% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 5% now. | New this edition | Rank 6 of 105, unchanged |
| DLP | 16% | 13% | ▼−3Since September 2026: 16% → 13%, −3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 2 of 89 |
| Insider risk | 0% | 3% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now. | New this edition | Rank 10 of 84, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Safetica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Safetica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 6 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct24 labels7
Paraphrase30 labels11
Comparative18 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained25 labels6
Scale-constrained10 labels1
Negative13 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative120 labels in all, every segment counted; 25 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“IBM Guardium Data Protection and Safetica are recommended sensitive data discovery and protection tools for a mid-sized B2B company.” Llama 4 Maverick · DSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Safetica is recognized as the best for SMB and mid-market DLP with insider risk visibility” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · direct prompt · first choice
“Safetica (Best Paid Budget Pick for SMBs)... Highly recommended in SMB reviews for value.” Grok 4.20 · DLP · budget prompt · first choice
“Need quick, managed SaaS with low per seat cost → Kickidler or Safetica from ~$6/PC/mo” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · budget prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“While it is considered an affordable SMB tool, it has limited enterprise features.” Llama 4 Maverick · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
“slow performance issues with Safetica, including delays with applications” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Safetica, over the 120 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Safetica was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Safetica, over the 120 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Safetica was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Safetica. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 120 of the 120 answers that named Safetica and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
currentware.com74
learn.g2.com51
miniorange.com49
kickidler.com48
g2.com47
strac.io46
forcepoint.com43
underdefense.com40
aimultiple.com35
us.fitgap.com34
467 of the 467 domain citations in answers naming Safetica came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
safetica.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Safetica takes 15% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.ShowHide
Search and answers
safetica.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Safetica takes 15% of first choices and Microsoft Purview DLP takes 46%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “data loss prevention platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “data loss prevention platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“safetica”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 10 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 515 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 308 · 5 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,446
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
15%
rank 2 of 89 in DLP
Segment leader
46%
Microsoft Purview DLP
- First choices
- 25 across its categories
- Named in
- 120 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 120 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on safetica.com
1,412
subdomains included
Content
332
counted in the table below
Documentation
391
Product · Integration
10 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 225 | 26 | 2026-09-24 | DLP | |
| News or press | 37 | 3 | 2026-09-03 | DLP | |
| Case study | 33 | 0 | 2025-11-25 | DLP | |
| Report or ebook | 10 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | DLP | |
| Comparison | 9 | 1 | 2026-08-27 | DLP | |
| Podcast or video | 7 | 1 | 2026-07-27 | DLP | |
| Conference or event | 5 | 0 | 2025-08-08 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 4 | 0 | 2025-07-23 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 2 | 2026-08-07 | DLP |
Most recent
- 2026-09-245 priznaku ze zastarala dlp reseni zaostavaji blog
- 2026-09-245 signs legacy dlp solutions have fallen behind blog
- 2026-09-24What an ai data security platform should do blog
- 2026-09-24Co by mela delat platforma pro zabezpeceni dat s ai blog
- 2026-09-11Safetica g2 podzim 2026 vysledky blog
- 2026-09-11Safetica g2 fall 2026 results blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page safetica.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Safetica
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Safetica; a claim can dispute any of them.
Safetica ONE / Safetica DLP 1
Follow Safetica
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Safetica is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Safetica is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Safetica is an AI-powered platform integrating data protection, insider risk, cloud security, and compliance —without slowing your teams down.
- For
- security teams
- Price stated
- Priced annually per user safetica.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $72 safetica.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial safetica.com/pricing
- Certifications
- GDPRHIPAAPCI-DSSISO 27001SOC 2NIS2
- Customers named
- Gyncentrum ClinicGyncentrum Poland GroupEsporte Clube PinheirosCOOSANLUISAGE Desenvolvimento de SistemasCoofinepEllipticTien Tuan Pharmaceutical Machinery
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Safetica's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: safetica.com, safetica.com/pricing, safetica.com/cs/platforma-safetica, safetica.com/resources/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Safetica's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Safetica, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Safetica by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Safetica is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Safetica, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Safetica is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Safetica is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideSafetica is among the products AI models recommend first in Data loss prevention this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.