Every category where a model named Safetica for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	16%	3 of 84	3%	33	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Safetica yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Safetica across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1	0	2
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	3	0	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	2	1	0	0	3
Grok 4.1 Fast	2	0	1	1	4
Mistral Small	0	1	2	0	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	0	1	1	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	4	0	0	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	3	1	0	4
MiniMax M2.5	2	1	1	0	4

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct17 labels9

Paraphrase16 labels3

Comparative15 labelsNone

Budget-constrained18 labels2

Scale-constrained8 labels1

Negative9 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative83 labels in all, every segment counted; 15 of the 16 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you want a single recommendation without more context, I would pick Safetica for a typical mid-market B2B company” Perplexity Sonar · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

“Safetica (Best Overall SMB Value) ... buy Safetica (Standard). It is easy, modern, and very fairly priced.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · first choice

“Start with Safetica for most mid-market B2B—highest fit in reviews for your size” Grok 4.1 Fast · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

“Good balance of DLP, insider risk, and compliance for mid-market organizations” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“but higher tiers push it less budget-friendly” Grok 4.1 Fast · DLP · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Safetica, over the 83 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Safetica was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Purview DLP63 of 8322Compare →

CurrentWare57 of 8321Compare →

Nightfall AI51 of 837Not in the top three

Netwrix Endpoint Protector45 of 832Not in the top three

Forcepoint DLP39 of 832Not in the top three

Symantec Data Loss Prevention30 of 831Not in the top three

miniOrange17 of 832Not in the top three

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP17 of 830Not in the top three

Cyberhaven11 of 832Not in the top three

Netskope DLP8 of 830Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Safetica. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 74 of the 83 answers that named Safetica and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

currentware.com65

gartner.com57

learn.g2.com49

miniorange.com46

underdefense.com39

forcepoint.com36

consilien.com35

strac.io29

kickidler.com26

safetica.comYour site26

382 of the 408 domain citations in answers naming Safetica came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software64

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-loss-prevention57

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software49

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools44

underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions38

consilien.com/news/best-dlp-solutions-202635

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dlp-software34

kickidler.com/reviews/top-best-data-loss-prevention-software-dlp.html26

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Safetica's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Safetica, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at safetica.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.