IT AI Index
Index Vendors › SolarWinds Security Event Manager · September 2026 Edition
SolarWinds · 1 category · Named, not ranked

SolarWinds Security Event Manager

8Judge labels
0First choices
3Negative labels
6 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
4 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. SolarWinds Security Event Manager was named 4 times in SIEM, where Microsoft Sentinel led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In siem · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named SolarWinds Security Event Manager for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
SIEM platformsSecurity operations0%45 of 4950%4under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Sentinel at 41%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for SolarWinds Security Event Manager yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated SolarWinds Security Event Manager across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00011
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase2 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained1 labelNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative8 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Affordable commercial | Companies wanting a paid tool without a huge premium” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“one thread explicitly says "Do not use solarwinds," though that is anecdotal” Perplexity Sonar · SIEM · negative prompt · hard negative
“Avoid if you scale: SolarWinds SEM (EPS ceiling)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · SIEM · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as SolarWinds Security Event Manager, over the 8 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and SolarWinds Security Event Manager was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Sentinel5 of 81Not in the top three
Graylog4 of 80Not in the top three
IBM QRadar4 of 80Not in the top three
Wazuh3 of 81Not in the top three
LogRhythm3 of 80Not in the top three
Elastic Security2 of 80Not in the top three
Exabeam2 of 80Not in the top three
Securonix2 of 80Not in the top three
Sumo Logic2 of 80Not in the top three
Blumira1 of 81Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named SolarWinds Security Event Manager. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 7 of the 8 answers that named SolarWinds Security Event Manager and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

paloaltonetworks.com3
reddit.com3
underdefense.com3
capterra.com2
cubeapm.com2
g2.com2
gartner.com2
solutionsinsider.com2
solutionsreview.com2
threatmatrix.co.uk2

Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming SolarWinds Security Event Manager came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as SolarWinds Security Event Manager

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as SolarWinds Security Event Manager; a claim can dispute any of them.
SolarWinds SIEM 2SolarWinds Security Event Manager (SEM) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when SolarWinds Security Event Manager's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as SolarWinds Security Event Manager, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at solarwinds.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack