| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 2% | 21 of 105 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18% | |
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 0% | 88 of 89 | 47% | 15 | criticized challenger | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“BigID and Trellix DLP are top recommendations” Mistral Small · DSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“comprehensive security solution that protects organizations against data loss across endpoints, networks, email, web, and cloud environments” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best Cloud-Native SaaS Option ... priced competitively for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if you already run McAfee/Trellix: Trellix DLP.” GPT-5.4 mini · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy, Heavy-Agent DLPs (e.g., Trellix/formerly McAfee, Broadcom/Symantec) ... these legacy giants require extreme caution ... Trellix, in particular, is widely criticized for heavy CPU and memory consumption.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fragmented product line since the merger; console experience and detection logic sometimes lag behind market expectations. High licensing costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Known for complex settings and configuration challenges, which can lead to operational overhead and potential misconfigurations.” Mistral Small · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Similar to Symantec — can be complex to deploy and manage; Less cloud-native than newer competitors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · comparative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 45 answers that named Trellix DLP and are not a share of its labels.
181 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Trellix DLP came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Trellix DLP's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: trellix.com/products/dlp. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trellix DLP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trellix DLP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trellix DLP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: