AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Trellix DLP · October 2026 Edition
Trellix · 2 categories · Ranked

Trellix DLP

45Judge labels
3First choices
22Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in DLP for enterprise buyers
Rank 21 of 105 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 1 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Trellix DLP →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dspm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Trellix DLP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Data security posture managementSecurity operations2%21 of 1050%1under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Purview at 18%
Data loss preventionSecurity operations0%88 of 8947%15criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Trellix DLP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Trellix DLP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini01001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00101
Grok 4.2000101
Mistral Small10012
DeepSeek V4 Flash00123
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash01012
Kimi K200011
GLM 4.7 FlashX00011
MiniMax M2.500101
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B01001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labels1
Paraphrase3 labels2
Comparative16 labelsNone
Budget-constrained3 labelsNone
Scale-constrained2 labelsNone
Negative14 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative45 labels in all, every segment counted; 3 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“BigID and Trellix DLP are top recommendations” Mistral Small · DSPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“comprehensive security solution that protects organizations against data loss across endpoints, networks, email, web, and cloud environments” Muse Glimmer 30B · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative
“Best Cloud-Native SaaS Option ... priced competitively for SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · budget prompt · alternative
“Best if you already run McAfee/Trellix: Trellix DLP.” GPT-5.4 mini · DLP · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Legacy, Heavy-Agent DLPs (e.g., Trellix/formerly McAfee, Broadcom/Symantec) ... these legacy giants require extreme caution ... Trellix, in particular, is widely criticized for heavy CPU and memory consumption.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · hard negative
“Fragmented product line since the merger; console experience and detection logic sometimes lag behind market expectations. High licensing costs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Known for complex settings and configuration challenges, which can lead to operational overhead and potential misconfigurations.” Mistral Small · DLP · negative prompt · soft negative
“Similar to Symantec — can be complex to deploy and manage; Less cloud-native than newer competitors” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Trellix DLP, over the 45 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Trellix DLP was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Symantec Data Loss Prevention38 of 454Not among the top eight
Microsoft Purview DLP34 of 4512Not among the top eight
Forcepoint DLP33 of 453Not among the top eight
Proofpoint Enterprise DLP27 of 452Not among the top eight
Netskope DLP16 of 450Not among the top eight
Nightfall AI14 of 451Not among the top eight
Safetica14 of 450Not among the top eight
Zscaler Internet Access14 of 450Not among the top eight
Fortra DLP11 of 450Not among the top eight
Cyberhaven10 of 451Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Trellix DLP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 45 of the 45 answers that named Trellix DLP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

strac.io31
forcepoint.com24
underdefense.com23
checkpoint.com19
gartner.com19
currentware.com15
learn.g2.com15
aimultiple.com12
miniorange.com12
g2.com11

181 of the 181 domain citations in answers naming Trellix DLP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

trellix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Trellix DLP takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview takes 18%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “dspm platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “dspm platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
210 a month (“trellix dlp”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
7 a month
Its company's site
trellix.com shared with Trellix's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site
about 71,321 a month
Searches its site ranks for
7,391 · 524 in the top three
Sites linking to it
11,022
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on Google
None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
2%
rank 21 of 105 in DSPM
Segment leader
18%
Microsoft Purview
First choices
3 across its categories
Named in
45 answers
Its own site cited
in 45 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Trellix DLP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Trellix DLP; a claim can dispute any of them.
Trellix 3Trellix Data Loss Prevention 2Trellix (McAfee) DLP 1Trellix (former McAfee Enterprise + FireEye) 1Trellix DLP (formerly McAfee DLP) 1Trellix/formerly McAfee 1

Follow Trellix DLP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Trellix is the company behind Trellix DLP.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Protects sensitive information across top threat vectors
For
Organizations
Customers named
SMS Group
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, certifications, hosting

What Trellix DLP's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: trellix.com/products/dlp. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Trellix DLP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Trellix DLP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Trellix DLP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Trellix DLP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Trellix DLP, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at trellix.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.