| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data security posture management | Security operations | 18% | 1 of 105 | 11% | 37 | accepted challenger | |
| Communications archiving and compliance | Security operations | 8% | 3 of 101 | 16% | 25 | accepted challenger | |
| Microsoft 365 management | IT operations and endpoint | 5% | 5 of 149 | 0% | 13 | accepted challenger | |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 4% | 3 of 233 | 0% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 2% | 8 of 84 | 6% | 16 | accepted challenger | |
| Data catalogs and governance | Data platform | 2% | 8 of 83 | 14% | 35 | accepted challenger | |
| AI governance platforms | Data platform | 0% | 26 of 135 | 15% | 13 | accepted challenger | |
| Data masking and test data management | Data platform | 0% | 26 of 140 | 0% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by DATPROF at 17% | |
| Data quality and observability | Data platform | 0% | 52 of 110 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Metaplane at 31% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 4 | 9 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 3 | 6 | 0 | 1 | 10 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 6 | 0 | 3 | 9 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 3 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 10 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 7 | 4 | 0 | 12 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 13 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 4 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 2 | 12 | 1 | 0 | 15 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 8 | 2 | 2 | 14 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 2 | 6 | 3 | 0 | 11 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 2 | 7 | 2 | 0 | 11 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 6 | 1 | 1 | 11 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 6 | 5 | 1 | 13 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Start with Microsoft Purview Suite ($10-12/user/month) if you're already in the Microsoft ecosystem—it offers the best balance of features, support, and predictable costs.” Kimi K2 · DSPM · budget prompt · first choice
“I'd start with Microsoft Purview's AI security and data-governance controls, alongside Defender for Cloud Apps—not buy a separate “AI security platform” first.” GPT-6 Luna · AI security · direct prompt · first choice
“Barracuda Cloud Archiving (for email) or Microsoft Purview (if you're already on M365) are the safest, most cost-effective choices” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Comms archiving · budget prompt · first choice
“Coro and Microsoft Purview are highly recommended for small businesses and startups (under 500 employees)” Mistral Small · Insider risk · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“user feedback and reviews frequently highlight immense friction, spotty lineage, and high database scanning costs when trying to integrate Purview with non-Microsoft environments” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Data catalogs · negative prompt · soft negative
“Microsoft Purview's visibility is strongest within the Microsoft ecosystem; organizations using significant non-Microsoft infrastructure will have gaps” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Insider risk · negative prompt · soft negative
“is outstanding for Microsoft-heavy environments ... but is notoriously limited when dealing with AWS, GCP, or non-Microsoft SaaS applications” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DSPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“organizations that don't already have M365 E5 licensing will find that advanced DSPM capabilities come at significant additional cost” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DSPM · budget prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 438 of the 464 answers that named Microsoft Purview and are not a share of its labels.
708 of the 865 domain citations in answers naming Microsoft Purview came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Microsoft Purview's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: microsoft.com, microsoft.com/en-ca/dynamics-365/pricing-overview, trust.microsoft.com, microsoft.com/en-ca/dynamics-365/solutions/ai, microsoft.com/cs-cz/isv/marketplace. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Microsoft Purview's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Microsoft Purview, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Microsoft Purview by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Microsoft Purview first in Data security posture management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Microsoft Purview is among the products AI models recommend first in Communications archiving and compliance this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Microsoft Purview is among the products AI models recommend first in AI security platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.