1 category · RankedTeramind
Standing by category
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 2% | 9 of 84 | 27% | 33 | criticized challenger |
Movement
By model
How each model treated Teramind across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 3 |
By framing
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Ideal for mid-market organizations (100-2,000 employees) seeking comprehensive employee monitoring for insider threat and productivity tracking” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Insider risk · direct prompt · first choice
“Teramind is worth evaluating if you specifically need endpoint activity monitoring and forensic detail, but it is more employee-monitoring-oriented” GPT-6 Luna · Insider risk · budget prompt · alternative
“Consider it if you specifically need detailed endpoint/user-activity monitoring; assess the employee-privacy and governance implications” GPT-6 Luna · Insider risk · direct prompt · alternative
“Need forensic-grade evidence for investigations or legal? → Teramind's session recording is unmatched.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · comparative prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Teramind, Veriato, and Coro/Metomic, which are not recommended for large enterprises due to performance issues or limited features” Llama 4 Maverick · Insider risk · negative prompt · hard negative
“Teramind consistently draws the most mixed feedback of the major IRM platforms: Poor customer support” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · negative prompt · hard negative
“Heavily employee-surveillance focused ... high privacy/HR risk for a B2B company” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Teramind unless you're comfortable with heavy employee surveillance” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · direct prompt · hard negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Teramind, over the 111 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Teramind was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
What carried it into the answer
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 108 of the 111 answers that named Teramind and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
391 of the 427 domain citations in answers naming Teramind came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
teramind.co ranks 2 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, Teramind takes 2% of first choices and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management takes 22%.ShowHide
Search and answers
In search
Google, US estimates- Searches for its name, Google
- 5,400 a month (“teramind”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 119 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 19,425 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 3,408 · 151 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 2,698
- Paid Google search
- 5 searches its ads show for, about 21 clicks and $518 a month (estimate)
In answers
This edition- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 111 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 108 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHide| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 168 | 21 | 2026-09-24 | ||
| Comparison | 53 | 6 | 2026-09-21 | ||
| Case study | 18 | undated | |||
| Glossary or explainer | 12 | 0 | 2025-07-12 | ||
| News or press | 12 | undated | |||
| Webinar or virtual event | 8 | 0 | 2026-01-19 | ||
| Podcast or video | 8 | 1 | 2026-07-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-24Workforce planning analytics blog
- 2026-09-24Pharma biotech insider risk blog
- 2026-09-22Workforce planning metrics blog
- 2026-09-21Dtex vs teramind comparison
- 2026-09-17Proofpoint vs teramind comparison
- 2026-09-15Legal dlp blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page teramind.co exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Teramind
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Teramind is its own company.ShowHide
The company
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Workforce Analytics & Insider Risk Platform
- For
- CISOs, HR, executives, security and HR teams
- Free plan or trial
- Start Free Trial teramind.co
- Certifications
- Teramind-certified implementation specialists
- Customers named
- Chelson GordonFortune 100 CompanyFortune 500 BankWestern ReserveVIVAMarble BoxBRMSPeak Support
- Not stated on the pages read
- Price, starting price, integrations, hosting
What Teramind's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: teramind.co, teramind.co/platform, teramind.co/case-studies, teramind.co/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Teramind's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Teramind, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Teramind by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Teramind is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Teramind, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.