| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insider risk management | Security operations | 0% | 23 of 84 | 23% | 13 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you have strict privacy laws (EU/GDPR) or heavy union presence: Choose DTEX Systems.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Insider risk · comparative prompt · alternative
“Already have a mature SOC with SIEM? → DTEX, Splunk UBA, or Securonix fit well.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · comparative prompt · alternative
“DTEX Systems / Securonix - Good if you already have SIEM/SOC infrastructure” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Insider risk · scale prompt · alternative
“Other notable options for mid-market companies include DTEX Systems and Code42” Mistral Small · Insider risk · direct prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Invasive monitoring (e.g., keystroke logging, screen recording in DTEX or Proofpoint ObserveIT) raises legal/ethical concerns” Grok 4.1 Fast · Insider risk · negative prompt · soft negative
“strong for analytics-heavy use cases, but one mid-market comparison notes slower deployment” Perplexity Sonar · Insider risk · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
“$150K+ | Advanced behavioral analytics... | Likely overkill/budget for 500 users” Kimi K2 · Insider risk · scale prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 39 of the 42 answers that named DTEX Systems and are not a share of its labels.
173 of the 187 domain citations in answers naming DTEX Systems came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-11 to 2026-10 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 198 | 15 | 2026-10-01 | Insider risk, DLP | |
| News or press | 12 | 1 | 2026-08-04 | ||
| Conference or event | 4 | 1 | 2026-08-31 | ||
| Case study | 3 | 0 | 2026-05-19 | Insider risk | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 3 | 0 | 2026-05-12 | DLP | |
| Report or ebook | 2 | undated | |||
| Comparison | 2 | 0 | 2024-08-23 |
As the event pages on dtex.ai state them, read October 5, 2026.
Every page dtex.ai exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What DTEX Systems's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: dtex.ai, trust.dtex.ai, dtex.ai/platform, dtex.ai/resources/case-studies, dtex.ai/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when DTEX Systems's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as DTEX Systems, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for DTEX Systems by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: