Every category where a model named Cyberhaven for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Data loss prevention	Security operations	4%	5 of 84	0%	15	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Cyberhaven yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Cyberhaven across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	3	1	0	4
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	1	1
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	2	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	1	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	2	0	2
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	2	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labels1

Paraphrase5 labels1

Comparative10 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained8 labels2

Negative7 labels2not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative37 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“A modern "Data Detection and Response" (DDR) platform that tracks data lineage... It is highly regarded for its low false-positive rates.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · scale prompt · first choice

“modern data-lineage and browser-focused DLP tools (e.g., Cyberhaven, Nightfall, Strac, or Next DLP)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · first choice

“Choose Cyberhaven if your competitive advantage relies on proprietary IP/source code” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · direct prompt · first choice

“They tend to have far lower false positive rates and faster deployment, though you should validate their enterprise readiness.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Cyberhaven, over the 37 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cyberhaven was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Purview DLP35 of 3710Not in the top three

Forcepoint DLP34 of 374Not in the top three

Symantec Data Loss Prevention30 of 370Not in the top three

Proofpoint Enterprise DLP23 of 370Not in the top three

Netskope DLP21 of 370Not in the top three

Nightfall AI16 of 370Not in the top three

Zscaler13 of 370Not in the top three

Safetica11 of 371Not in the top three

Strac9 of 370Not in the top three

Digital Guardian5 of 370Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cyberhaven. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 27 of the 37 answers that named Cyberhaven and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

gartner.com22

cyberhaven.comYour site19

strac.io19

forcepoint.com18

underdefense.com16

proofpoint.com15

currentware.com13

learn.g2.com12

miniorange.com12

paloaltonetworks.com11

138 of the 157 domain citations in answers naming Cyberhaven came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

gartner.com/reviews/market/data-loss-prevention22

forcepoint.com/blog/insights/best-dlp-software18

underdefense.com/blog/dlp-solutions16

proofpoint.com/us/industry-comparison/dlp13

currentware.com/blog/best-data-loss-prevention-software12

learn.g2.com/best-data-loss-prevention-software12

miniorange.com/blog/top-data-loss-prevention-tools12

strac.io/blog/top-7-data-loss-prevention-solutions-comparison-and-dlp-evaluation-checklist11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cyberhaven's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cyberhaven, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at cyberhaven.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.