Every category where a model named Securonix UEBA for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Insider risk management	Security operations	0%	22 of 84	15%	13	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Securonix UEBA yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Securonix UEBA across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	1	1
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	1	2
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	1	2	0	3

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct3 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels1

Comparative14 labelsNone

Budget-constrained9 labelsNone

Scale-constrained6 labels1

Negative7 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative47 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Securonix is described as the strongest overall choice for enterprises that need centralized insider-risk monitoring” Muse Glimmer 30B · Insider risk · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Best when insider risk is being handled as part of a broader UEBA / security analytics program.” GPT-5.4 mini · Insider risk · comparative prompt · alternative

“DTEX Systems / Securonix - Good if you already have SIEM/SOC infrastructure” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Insider risk · scale prompt · alternative

“Best for: Large enterprises needing SIEM-integrated insider threat detection” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Built for large enterprises; overkill and overpriced for mid-sized teams” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Insider risk · paraphrase prompt · hard negative

“especially UEBA-based like Varonis or Securonix) generate noisy alerts if not tuned for your environment” Grok 4.1 Fast · Insider risk · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Securonix UEBA, over the 47 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Securonix UEBA was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management28 of 4718Not among the top eight

DTEX InTERCEPT24 of 471Not among the top eight

Teramind24 of 471Not among the top eight

Varonis Data Security Platform23 of 470Not among the top eight

Above Security20 of 477Not among the top eight

DTEX Systems19 of 474Not among the top eight

Code42 Incydr19 of 470Not among the top eight

Proofpoint Insider Threat Management18 of 470Not among the top eight

Gurucul17 of 470Not among the top eight

Forcepoint DLP12 of 470Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Securonix UEBA. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 47 of the 47 answers that named Securonix UEBA and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

insiderisk.io38

breachsense.com23

learn.microsoft.com22

gartner.com21

nightfall.ai19

riskpublishing.com18

guptadeepak.com16

livingsecurity.com13

peerspot.com13

exabeam.com12

195 of the 195 domain citations in answers naming Securonix UEBA came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

insiderisk.io/research/insider-risk-management-vendor-comparison-202533

insiderisk.io/research/insider-threat-detection-solutions-technologies-202527

breachsense.com/blog/insider-threat-detection-software23

insiderisk.io/research/best-insider-risk-management-tools-202621

riskpublishing.com/best-insider-threat-management-software-compare18

gartner.com/reviews/market/insider-risk-management-solutions17

nightfall.ai/blog/top-10-insider-risk-management-products-of-202417

guptadeepak.com/tools/top-5-insider-threat-management-tools-202616

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

securonix.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Securonix UEBA takes 0% of first choices and Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management takes 22%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “insider risk management tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “insider risk management tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 20 a month (“securonix ueba”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 0 a month
Its company's site: securonix.com shared with Securonix's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 3,571 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 1,125 · 77 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 3,705
Paid Google search: 1 searches its ads show for, about 5 clicks and $13 a month (estimate)

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

14 ads · 8 text, 6 image · 9 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2024, as Securonix, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 13 in the year, 1 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 22 of 84 in insider risk

Segment leader

22%

Microsoft Purview Insider Risk Management

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 47 answers
Its own site cited: in 47 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Securonix UEBA

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Securonix UEBA; a claim can dispute any of them.

Securonix 12

Follow Securonix UEBA

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Securonix is the company behind Securonix UEBA.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Unlock the Power of UEBA: A Live Technical Demo for SOC Teams
securonix.com/ueba-demo-days
For: SOC practitioners, security analysts, and technical decision-makers
securonix.com/ueba-demo-days
Price stated: Free to Attend securonix.com/ueba-demo-days-ty
Free plan or trial: Online – Free to Attend securonix.com/ueba-demo-days
Not stated on the pages read: Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Securonix UEBA's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: securonix.com/ueba-demo-days, securonix.com/ueba-demo-days-ty, securonix.com/ueba-for-detecting-insider-threats, securonix.com/ueba-for-detecting-insider-threats-apmea, securonix.com/ueba-for-detecting-insider-threats-apmea-live-webinar-ty. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Securonix UEBA's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Securonix UEBA, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Securonix UEBA by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Securonix UEBA is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Securonix UEBA, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.