| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Data loss prevention | Security operations | 4% | 6 of 84 | 31% | 49 | criticized challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 5 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 1 | 3 | 5 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 3 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 4 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 4 | 0 | 1 | 5 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 5 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best overall balance for mid-market — Scored highest (7.96/10)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · direct prompt · first choice
“Best overall for ~500 users | Forcepoint DLP or Safetica” MiniMax M2.5 · DLP · scale prompt · first choice
“If you need broader coverage beyond Microsoft: Evaluate Forcepoint DLP for its unified policy engine and risk-adaptive protection.” Kimi K2 · DLP · scale prompt · alternative
“if you need advanced threat detection and don't have Microsoft products, Forcepoint DLP provides excellent AI-powered protection” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DLP · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Legacy enterprise DLP platforms (such as Broadcom/Symantec, Forcepoint, or Trellix) are often a poor fit for the mid-market.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · direct prompt · hard negative
“Avoid Forcepoint DLP if you're migrating to the cloud or have limited on-premises expertise.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DLP · negative prompt · hard negative
“legacy enterprise DLP tools like Broadcom (Symantec) or Forcepoint are rarely the right fit” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DLP · paraphrase prompt · hard negative
“Avoid heavyweights like Forcepoint/Symantec (better for 5K+ users, custom/high pricing)” Grok 4.1 Fast · DLP · direct prompt · hard negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 100 of the 126 answers that named Forcepoint DLP and are not a share of its labels.
437 of the 497 domain citations in answers naming Forcepoint DLP came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Forcepoint DLP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Forcepoint DLP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at forcepoint.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.