AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › RingCentral › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to RingCentral, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 370 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where RingCentral holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 370 answers that did not name RingCentral, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Business phone systems

IT operations and endpoint. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when RingCentral is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessRingCentral is #2 of 11 here at 21% of first choices, 42 labels.

Fifty-three of the eighty-four answers did not name RingCentral; it was the first choice in fourteen. The first choices in those fifty-three answers, fifteen products in all, the eight most named:

7 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketRingCentral is #1 of 12 here at 29% of first choices, 49 labels.

Fifty-one of the eighty-four answers did not name RingCentral; it was the first choice in twenty-three. The first choices in those fifty-one answers, twelve products in all, the eight most named:

4 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseRingCentral is #1 of 10 here at 38% of first choices, 53 labels.

Thirty-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name RingCentral; it was the first choice in thirty-one. The first choices in those thirty-seven answers, fourteen products in all, the eight most named:

6 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

Video conferencing

IT operations and endpoint. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when RingCentral is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessRingCentral is #5 of 10 here at 3% of first choices, 15 labels.

Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name RingCentral; it was the first choice in two. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, seven products in all:

Microsoft11 of 74
Google Meet10 of 74
Jitsi Meet1 of 74
Signal1 of 74
Zoom One1 of 74
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketRingCentral is #7 of 9 here at 0% of first choices, 12 labels.

Seventy-six of the eighty-four answers did not name RingCentral; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-six answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

3 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseRingCentral holds 8 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Seventy-nine of the eighty-four answers did not name RingCentral; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those seventy-nine answers, seven products in all:

The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled RingCentral neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named RingCentral only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from RingCentral's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of RingCentral was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.