AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › RingCentral MVP · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Named, not ranked

RingCentral MVP

5Judge labels
4First choices
0Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. RingCentral MVP was named 2 times in Business phones, where RingCentral led with 29%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business9 of 72
3%2 labels
under the label threshold
Mid-market8 of 75
3%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise34 of 78
0%1 label
under the label threshold
In business phones · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named RingCentral MVP for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Business phone systemsIT operations and endpoint3%8 of 750%2under 10 labels · led by RingCentral at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for RingCentral MVP yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated RingCentral MVP across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500000
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash10001
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small10001
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K200000
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct0 labelsNone
Paraphrase3 labels3
Comparative1 label1not counted in share
Budget-constrained1 label1
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative0 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 5 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“RingCentral MVP (RingEX) is the top recommendation due to its robust features, reliability, and strong integration ecosystem” Mistral Small · Business phones · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Best Overall for Deep B2B Integrations & Advanced Telephony” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Business phones · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as RingCentral MVP, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and RingCentral MVP was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Microsoft Teams Phone4 of 50Not among the top eight
Zoom Phone3 of 50Not among the top eight
Dialpad2 of 50Not among the top eight
Nextiva2 of 50Not among the top eight
Vonage2 of 50Not among the top eight
3CX1 of 50Not among the top eight
8x81 of 50Not among the top eight
8x8 XCaaS1 of 50Not among the top eight
Cisco Unified Communications Manager1 of 50Not among the top eight
Dialpad Connect1 of 50Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named RingCentral MVP. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 4 of the 5 answers that named RingCentral MVP and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertmarket.com3
cloudtalk.io2
forbes.com2
nextiva.com2
ringcentral.comYour site2
techrepublic.com2
traffictail.com2
zoom.com2
8x8.com1
aircall.io1

Seventeen of the nineteen domain citations in answers naming RingCentral MVP came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

cloudtalk.io/blog/unified-communications-as-a-service-providers2
expertmarket.com/phone-systems/ucaas-providers2
forbes.com/advisor/business/software/best-ucaas-providers2
techrepublic.com/article/best-ucaas-providers2
traffictail.com/ucaas-platforms2
zoom.com/en/blog/unified-communications-solutions2
8x8.com/8/8x8-vs-vonage1
aircall.io/blog/tech/enterprise-phone-system1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

ringcentral.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, RingCentral MVP takes 3% of first choices and RingCentral takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “business phone system”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “business phone systems”
–
not in the top ten
Organic visits to its site
about 9,737,061 a month
Searches its site ranks for
50,036 · 7,365 in the top three
Sites linking to it
28,303
Paid Google search
10 searches its ads show for, about 86 clicks and $3,711 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 56 text, 54 video, 10 image · 120 shown in the last 30 days

First shown January 2022, as Ringcentral Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 104 in the year, 16 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
3%
rank 8 of 75 in business phones
Segment leader
29%
RingCentral
First choices
4 across its categories
Named in
5 answers
Its own site cited
in 4 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on ringcentral.com
10,052
subdomains included
Content
3,444
counted in the table below
Documentation
34
Product · Integration
257 · 3,532
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog2,364182026-09-25
News or press609undated
Conference or event13102020-04-02
Report or ebook12802026-02-12
Webinar or virtual event7812026-10-14
Comparison6812026-09-22
Glossary or explainer4102024-09-16
Case study2102022-05-05
Template or tool402022-09-01

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on ringcentral.com state them, read September 28, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page ringcentral.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as RingCentral MVP

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as RingCentral MVP; a claim can dispute any of them.
RingCentral MVP (RingCentral Video/Phone) 1RingCentral MVP (RingEX) 1

Follow RingCentral MVP

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

RingCentral MVP is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
A seamless solution that combines messaging, video conferencing, and phone calls into one unified platform.
ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Free plan or trial
Try free ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html
Integrations claimed
500 ringcentral.com/solutions/startups
Certifications
C5CCPACyber Essentials PlusGDPRHIPAAHITRUSTISO 22301ISO/IEC 27001
Hosting
AustraliaCanadaGermanyUnited KingdomUSAIreland*
Customers named
Vodafone BusinessGolden State WarriorseBayHubSpotAT&TT-MobileOptusReddit
Not stated on the pages read
Price

What RingCentral MVP's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: ringcentral.com, ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html, trust.ringcentral.com, ringcentral.com/solutions/startups. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RingCentral MVP's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RingCentral MVP, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RingCentral MVP by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where RingCentral MVP is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name RingCentral MVP, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at ringcentral.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.