| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Business phone systems | IT operations and endpoint | 12% | 4 of 75 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“A versatile all-around option... Want the most broadly featured standalone system? Compare RingCentral and Nextiva.” GPT-6 Luna · Business phones · comparative prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company, RingCentral RingEX is the strongest overall recommendation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · Business phones · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“### 1. RingCentral RingEX - Best for: Enterprise teams needing deep CRM integrations” Kimi K2 · Business phones · comparative prompt · first choice
“For a mid-sized B2B company the most consistently rated fit is RingCentral RingEX.” Muse Glimmer 30B · Business phones · paraphrase prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 29 of the 29 answers that named RingCentral RingEX and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-six of the ninety-six domain citations in answers naming RingCentral RingEX came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 2,364 | 18 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| News or press | 609 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 131 | 0 | 2020-04-02 | ||
| Report or ebook | 128 | 0 | 2026-02-12 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 78 | 1 | 2026-10-14 | ||
| Comparison | 68 | 1 | 2026-09-22 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 41 | 0 | 2024-09-16 | ||
| Case study | 21 | 0 | 2022-05-05 | ||
| Template or tool | 4 | 0 | 2022-09-01 |
As the event pages on ringcentral.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
Every page ringcentral.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What RingCentral RingEX's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: ringcentral.com, ringcentral.com/pricing/video.html, trust.ringcentral.com, ringcentral.com/solutions/startups. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when RingCentral RingEX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as RingCentral RingEX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for RingCentral RingEX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: