| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Video conferencing | IT operations and endpoint | 2% | 7 of 50 | 0% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Zoom Workplace at 42% | |
| Email security | Security operations | 0% | 56 of 76 | 43% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Microsoft Defender for Office 365 at 32% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Communications archiving and compliance | Security operations | 0% | 85 of 101 | 50% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Smarsh Enterprise Archive at 20% | |
| Enterprise AI assistants | Data platform | 0% | 60 of 145 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by ChatGPT at 25% | |
| IT documentation | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 88 of 92 | 100% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Hudu at 17% | |
| Virtual desktops | IT operations and endpoint | 0% | 35 of 81 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Azure Virtual Desktop at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Best for: The vast majority of budget-conscious startups and small businesses.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Video conferencing · budget prompt · first choice
“Stronger multimodal capabilities ... It excels at complex data visualization queries within Sheets and BigQuery.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Enterprise AI · comparative prompt · alternative
“If you use Google Workspace, begin with Gmail's built-in spam and phishing protections” GPT-6 Luna · Email security · budget prompt · alternative
“Google Workspace fits organizations already using Google's productivity suite” GLM 4.7 FlashX · Virtual desktops · comparative prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Anti-pattern for IT docs—scattered folders, no structure for configs/assets, weak access controls” Grok 4.20 · IT documentation · negative prompt · hard negative
“Offer only the baseline filtering built into large suites like Microsoft 365 or Google Workspace without a dedicated email security layer.” Perplexity Sonar · Email security · negative prompt · soft negative
“neither satisfies all requirements for tamper-proof storage, legal hold management, or enterprise-scale eDiscovery by default” Claude Haiku 4.5 · Comms archiving · negative prompt · soft negative
“relying *solely* on native cloud email security is a risk for organizations with high threat profiles” Gemini 3.5 Flash · Email security · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 59 of the 67 answers that named Google Workspace and are not a share of its labels.
Seventy-nine of the eighty-eight domain citations in answers naming Google Workspace came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Case study | 707 | undated | |||
| Blog | 372 | 0 | 2018-12-13 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 51 | 0 | 2018-12-13 | ||
| Comparison | 35 | undated | |||
| News or press | 34 | undated | |||
| Template or tool | 1 | undated | |||
| Podcast or video | 1 | undated |
Every page google.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Read September 29, 2026.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Google Workspace's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: workspace.google.com, google.com, google.com/adwords/express/pricing, google.com/admob/platform.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Google Workspace's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Google Workspace, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Google Workspace by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows: