AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › OWASP ZAP › Alternatives · October 2026 Edition
Two categories · what the models named instead

Alternatives to OWASP ZAP, as AI models named them

In the October 2026 Edition, 386 of the 504 answers collected in the two categories where OWASP ZAP holds a standing named it neither as a first choice nor as an alternative. These are the products those answers put first, category by category and buyer by buyer. The output is the models' output.

Named instead, most often
First choices in the 386 answers that did not name OWASP ZAP, every category and segment above added together; a product can be counted in several. Each category below keeps its own denominator.

Dynamic application security testing

Developer platform. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when OWASP ZAP is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessOWASP ZAP is #1 of 12 here at 43% of first choices, 70 labels.

Twenty-seven of the eighty-four answers did not name OWASP ZAP; it was the first choice in forty-two. The first choices in those twenty-seven answers, nine products in all, the eight most named:

1 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketOWASP ZAP is #1 of 11 here at 29% of first choices, 54 labels.

Forty-eight of the eighty-four answers did not name OWASP ZAP; it was the first choice in eighteen. The first choices in those forty-eight answers, eleven products in all, the eight most named:

3 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseOWASP ZAP is #14 of 14 here at 0% of first choices, 21 labels.

Eighty-two of the eighty-four answers did not name OWASP ZAP; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-two answers, sixteen products in all, the eight most named:

8 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

API security platforms

Security operations. Six framings, fourteen models, one answer each per buyer segment; an answer counts here when OWASP ZAP is not its first choice or an alternative in it.
Small businessOWASP ZAP is #5 of 14 here at 7% of first choices, 21 labels.

Seventy-one of the eighty-four answers did not name OWASP ZAP; it was the first choice in six. The first choices in those seventy-one answers, twenty-six products in all, the eight most named:

18 more in the record.The full small business standing →
Mid-marketOWASP ZAP is #2 of 13 here at 10% of first choices, 12 labels.

Seventy-four of the eighty-four answers did not name OWASP ZAP; it was the first choice in five. The first choices in those seventy-four answers, nineteen products in all, the eight most named:

11 more in the record.The full mid-market standing →
EnterpriseOWASP ZAP holds 0 labels here, under the 10-label cutoff, so it is unranked.

Eighty-four of the eighty-four answers did not name OWASP ZAP; it was the first choice in zero. The first choices in those eighty-four answers, eighteen products in all, the eight most named:

10 more in the record.The full enterprise standing →

How to read this

A category is asked six ways of each of fourteen models on behalf of each buyer segment, so a segment is eighty-four answers. An answer belongs on this page when the judge labeled OWASP ZAP neither its first choice nor an alternative in it; the products listed are the first choices those answers made, counted once per answer. An answer that named nothing first, or named OWASP ZAP only in passing, is in the denominator and adds to no product. The counts are not the category standing, which is on the category page with its share and rank; they are the same record read from OWASP ZAP's side.

Every answer and every label behind these figures is in the record, sent on request. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index, and a product named instead of OWASP ZAP was named by a model, not endorsed by anyone.