Every category where a model named Burp Suite Enterprise Edition for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Dynamic application security testing	Developer platform	6%	7 of 58	0%	4	under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Burp Suite Enterprise Edition yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Burp Suite Enterprise Edition across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	First choice	Alternative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	2	0	2
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct5 labels2

Paraphrase4 labels1

Comparative4 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained2 labels1

Scale-constrained1 labelNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative18 labels in all, every segment counted; 4 of the 6 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“If you already use or are familiar with Burp Suite, Burp Suite Enterprise Edition would be the top choice for its depth and scalability.” Mistral Small · DAST · direct prompt · first choice

“Burp Suite Enterprise Edition - sized for mid-market and enterprise teams with security engineers familiar with the Burp ecosystem.” Llama 4 Maverick · DAST · direct prompt · first choice

“Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and Aikido Security are the top recommendations” Mistral Small · DAST · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Best Budget / Security-Led Choice: Burp Suite Enterprise Edition” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAST · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, over the 18 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Burp Suite Enterprise Edition was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Invicti15 of 189Not among the top eight

Rapid7 InsightAppSec6 of 182Not among the top eight

Checkmarx DAST6 of 180Not among the top eight

HCL AppScan6 of 180Not among the top eight

StackHawk6 of 180Not among the top eight

Veracode DAST5 of 180Not among the top eight

Acunetix4 of 181Not among the top eight

Aikido Security4 of 180Not among the top eight

OWASP ZAP3 of 181Not among the top eight

Bright Security3 of 180Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Burp Suite Enterprise Edition. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 17 of the 18 answers that named Burp Suite Enterprise Edition and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com11

augmentcode.com10

invicti.com10

cybersectools.com8

escape.tech8

cyberpress.org6

beaglesecurity.com5

aikido.dev4

aimultiple.com4

appsecsanta.com4

No domain is on file for Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, so its own site is not marked.

Pages cited

getastra.com/blog/dast/tools11

augmentcode.com/tools/best-dast-tools-for-enterprise-security10

cybersectools.com/resources/shortlists/best-dast-tools8

cyberpress.org/dast-tools-by-use-case6

invicti.com/blog/web-security/best-enterprise-dast-tools-for-large-enterprises-buyers-guid5

aimultiple.com/dast-tools4

escape.tech/blog/dast-tools-buyers-guide4

stackhawk.com/blog/dynamic-application-security-testing-tools-comparison4

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Burp Suite Enterprise Edition stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 30 a month (“burp suite enterprise edition”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Its own site: No site of its own on file, so no site figures

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 7 of 58 in DAST

Segment leader

29%

OWASP ZAP

First choices: 4 across its categories
Named in: 18 answers
Its own site cited: No site on file to match

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Follow Burp Suite Enterprise Edition

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Burp Suite Enterprise Edition's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Burp Suite Enterprise Edition by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Burp Suite Enterprise Edition is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.