AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › 42Crunch · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

42Crunch

86Judge labels
13First choices
4Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in API security for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 93 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 31 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of 42Crunch →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In api security · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named 42Crunch for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
API security platformsSecurity operations8%4 of 933%31accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for 42Crunch yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated 42Crunch across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.511103
GPT-5.4 mini11114
Gemini 3.5 Flash02002
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.1 Fast00000
Mistral Small11103
DeepSeek V4 Flash01001
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash12003
Kimi K211204
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001
GPT-6 Luna04004
Muse Glimmer 30B03003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels2
Paraphrase12 labels3
Comparative28 labels7not counted in share
Budget-constrained18 labels7
Scale-constrained8 labels1
Negative4 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative86 labels in all, every segment counted; 13 of the 20 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Pricing is the most accessible among dedicated platforms: a free tier for individual developers, a single user plan starting at $7.50 per month” Claude Haiku 4.5 · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall budget-conscious choice: 42Crunch if you want to start smaller and keep costs more predictable.” GPT-5.4 mini · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“42Crunch: Often recommended for its affordability and robust API security features.” Mistral Small · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“Need pre-release security? → 42Crunch” Qwen 3.7 Flash · API security · comparative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“42Crunch reviewers specifically call out that inaccurate contracts reduce effectiveness, and that deployment/orchestration can add overhead.” GPT-5.4 mini · API security · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as 42Crunch, over the 86 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and 42Crunch was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Cequence Unified API Protection25 of 860Not among the top eight
Cloudflare API Shield22 of 861Not among the top eight
Imperva API Security19 of 860Not among the top eight
APIsec13 of 860Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named 42Crunch. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 81 of the 86 answers that named 42Crunch and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

radware.com45
learn.g2.com33
axis-intelligence.com31
akamai.com30
beaglesecurity.com30
zuplo.com30
indusface.com28
appsecsanta.com26
cequence.ai23
gartner.com22

298 of the 298 domain citations in answers naming 42Crunch came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

42crunch.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, 42Crunch takes 8% of first choices and Aikido Security takes 12%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “api security platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “api security platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
320 a month (“42crunch”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
4 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 380 a month
Searches its site ranks for
182 · 7 in the top three
Sites linking to it
905
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
3 ads · 3 text · 0 shown in the last 30 days

First shown July 2025, as 42Crunch Security Systems Ltd., verified.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 93 in API security
Segment leader
12%
Aikido Security
First choices
13 across its categories
Named in
86 answers
Its own site cited
in 81 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on 42crunch.com
1,485
subdomains included
Content
41
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,353
Product · Integration
3 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog20undated
News or press9undated
Webinar or virtual event302024-07-01
Comparison302024-06-07DAST
Glossary or explainer302024-12-10
Report or ebook2undated
Case study1undated

Most recent

  • 2024-12-10101 glossary or explainer
  • 2024-07-0136 webinar or virtual event
  • 2024-06-0732 comparison
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page 42crunch.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Follow 42Crunch

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

42Crunch is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Security Platform for MCP
For
enterprises
Price stated
Enterprise Pricing 42crunch.com/pricing.html
Free plan or trial
Free trial 42crunch.com
Certifications
ISO 27001
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, hosting, customers

What 42Crunch's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: 42crunch.com, 42crunch.com/pricing.html, 42crunch.com/platform-overview.html. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when 42Crunch's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as 42Crunch, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for 42Crunch by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where 42Crunch is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name 42Crunch, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at 42crunch.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.