Every category where a model named Beagle Security for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Dynamic application security testing	Developer platform	0%	17 of 58	0%	7	under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%
API security platforms	Security operations	0%	25 of 93	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%
Penetration testing as a service	Security operations	0%	22 of 82	0%	3	under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45%	=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
Attack surface management	Security operations	0%	38 of 100	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49%	newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Beagle Security yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Beagle Security across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	2	0	2
Grok 4.20	0	1	1
Mistral Small	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	2	4
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	1	0	1
Kimi K2	1	0	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct10 labelsNone

Paraphrase8 labels2

Comparative10 labelsNone

Budget-constrained11 labelsNone

Scale-constrained4 labelsNone

Negative6 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Startups and DevSecOps teams benefit most from Agentic AI pentesting platforms like Beagle Security” Claude Haiku 4.5 · PTaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

“Best if: your main priority is continuous automated API security testing and pen-testing” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API security · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“For small budgets or frequent quick tests: Explore AI-driven options like Beagle Security.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · PTaaS · comparative prompt · alternative

“An automated penetration testing platform that uses AI to handle complex authentication” Mistral Small · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Beagle Security, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Beagle Security was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

StackHawk25 of 498Not among the top eight

OWASP ZAP23 of 499Not among the top eight

Salt Security14 of 490Not among the top eight

Intruder12 of 494Not among the top eight

Burp Suite11 of 491Not among the top eight

Invicti10 of 493Not among the top eight

Akamai API Security10 of 490Not among the top eight

Cloudflare API Shield10 of 490Not among the top eight

42Crunch9 of 492Not among the top eight

Acunetix9 of 490Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Beagle Security. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 49 answers that named Beagle Security and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

beaglesecurity.comYour site47

getastra.com25

g2.com24

radware.com21

escape.tech18

learn.g2.com18

aikido.dev16

stackhawk.com14

zuplo.com14

expertinsights.com12

162 of the 209 domain citations in answers naming Beagle Security came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

learn.g2.com/best-api-security-tools18

radware.com/cyberpedia/application-security/api-security-platforms16

beaglesecurity.com/blog/article/best-dast-tools.html12

zuplo.com/learning-center/best-api-security-tools-202612

aikido.dev/blog/top-dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-tools11

aimultiple.com/dast-tools11

beaglesecurity.com/blog/article/best-api-security-solutions-enterprises.html11

beaglesecurity.com/blog/article/best-api-security-tools.html11

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

beaglesecurity.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Beagle Security takes 0% of first choices and OWASP ZAP takes 29%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “dast tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “dast tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 140 a month (“beagle security”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 14 a month
Organic visits to its site: about 10,729 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 2,528 · 67 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 1,787
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on Google

None found in Google's ad transparency records for the US

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 17 of 58 in DAST

Segment leader

29%

OWASP ZAP

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 49 answers
Its own site cited: in 49 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide

Addresses on beaglesecurity.com

1,313

subdomains included

Content

1,043

counted in the table below

Documentation

166

Product · Integration

7 · 0

Kind	Pages	Last 90 days	Latest	Categories named
Blog	931	21	2026-09-25	EDR, Firewalls
Comparison	63	9	2026-08-31	SAST
Conference or event	22	undated
Glossary or explainer	12	0	2026-05-13
Template or tool	5	0	2026-05-04
News or press	5	undated
Case study	3	0	2026-03-31
Report or ebook	2	undated

Most recent

2026-09-25Agentic pentesting tools blog
2026-09-23Top penetration testing companies blog
2026-09-10New security report coming blog
2026-09-02Tenable pricing blog
2026-09-01Top software security audit tools blog
2026-08-31Top snyk alternatives comparison

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page beaglesecurity.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Follow Beagle Security

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Beagle Security is its own company.

ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: AI-powered AppSec platform; The agentic AI pentesting platform for your web apps, APIs & GraphQL
beaglesecurity.com
For: dev & security teams
beaglesecurity.com
Price stated: Essential $99 per month; Advanced $299 per month; Enterprise Contact sales; Free $0 beaglesecurity.com/pricing
Starting price: 0 beaglesecurity.com/pricing
Free plan or trial: 14-day free trial; No credit card required beaglesecurity.com
Certifications: ISO 27001 certifiedISO 27001SOC 2ISO 27001-readyHIPAA
Hosting: San Francisco, USAKerala, IndiaUnited States of AmericaIndia
Customers named: Switch4schoolsFlignoBoralThe FactoryDuoCircleMaxexPDQTravel Wifi
Not stated on the pages read: Integrations

What Beagle Security's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: beaglesecurity.com, beaglesecurity.com/pricing, trust.beaglesecurity.com, beaglesecurity.com/solutions/saas, beaglesecurity.com/partners. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Beagle Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Beagle Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Beagle Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Beagle Security is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Beagle Security, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.