Every category where a model named Veracode DAST for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Dynamic application security testing	Developer platform	0%	20 of 58	25%	8	under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Veracode DAST yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Veracode DAST across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	1	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	1	0	0	1
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	1	1
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	0	0
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	0	0	0	0
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct9 labels1

Paraphrase9 labels1

Comparative12 labels2not counted in share

Budget-constrained6 labelsNone

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative10 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative53 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 4 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Established enterprise presence, strong reporting | Complex to configure” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAST · scale prompt · alternative

“DevSecOps: Veracode DAST, StackHawk, or Nuclei” MiniMax M2.5 · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative

“full platform → Veracode/Checkmarx” Grok 4.1 Fast · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“sub-5% false positive rates, but is resource-intensive with a steep learning curve” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAST · comparative prompt · soft negative

“easier to implement than enterprise tools like Checkmarx or Veracode” Kimi K2 · DAST · direct prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Veracode DAST, over the 53 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Veracode DAST was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Invicti45 of 5321Not among the top eight

OWASP ZAP23 of 534Not among the top eight

HCL AppScan22 of 531Not among the top eight

Rapid7 InsightAppSec21 of 530Not among the top eight

StackHawk20 of 534Not among the top eight

Acunetix20 of 532Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One20 of 530Not among the top eight

Burp Suite19 of 531Not among the top eight

Checkmarx DAST14 of 531Not among the top eight

OpenText Fortify WebInspect12 of 530Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Veracode DAST. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 48 of the 53 answers that named Veracode DAST and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com39

augmentcode.com35

aikido.dev31

beaglesecurity.com27

stackhawk.com27

invicti.com26

aimultiple.com24

checkmarx.com24

appsecsanta.com23

cyberpress.org19

275 of the 275 domain citations in answers naming Veracode DAST came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getastra.com/blog/dast/tools37

augmentcode.com/tools/best-dast-tools-for-enterprise-security35

stackhawk.com/blog/dynamic-application-security-testing-tools-comparison26

aimultiple.com/dast-tools21

aikido.dev/blog/top-dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-tools20

invicti.com/blog/web-security/best-enterprise-dast-tools-for-large-enterprises-buyers-guid18

checkmarx.com/learn/dast/dast-tools-key-features-and-12-solutions-to-know-in-202617

cyberpress.org/dast-tools-by-use-case17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

veracode.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Veracode DAST takes 0% of first choices and OWASP ZAP takes 29%.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Position for “dast tool”

–

not in the top ten

Position for “dast tools”

–

not in the top ten

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“veracode dast”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 14 a month
Its company's site: veracode.com shared with Veracode's other products; the figures are the site's
Organic visits to its site: about 12,543 a month
Searches its site ranks for: 3,691 · 181 in the top three
Sites linking to it: 9,588
Paid Google search: No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none

Ads on GoogleDetailLess

22 ads · 17 image, 3 text, 2 video · 17 shown in the last 30 days

First shown March 2026, as Veracode, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 22 in the year. 1 more by other advertisers linking to it.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 20 of 58 in DAST

Segment leader

29%

OWASP ZAP

First choices: 2 across its categories
Named in: 53 answers
Its own site cited: in 48 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Veracode DAST

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Veracode DAST; a claim can dispute any of them.

Veracode 6

Follow Veracode DAST

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Veracode is the company behind Veracode DAST.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Veracode: Veracode Developer Training, Veracode Dynamic Analysis, Veracode Risk Manager, Veracode Secure Code Training, Veracode Security Labs, Veracode Training

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: Dynamic Application Security Testing for Development & Security Teams
veracode.com/veracode-dynamic-analysis-free-trial
For: Development & Security Teams
veracode.com/veracode-dynamic-analysis-free-trial
Free plan or trial: Start Your Free, 14-Day Trial veracode.com/veracode-dynamic-analysis-free-trial
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Veracode DAST's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: veracode.com/veracode-dynamic-analysis-free-trial, docs.veracode.com/r/DAST, docs.veracode.com/r/Veracode, docs.veracode.com/r/DAST_REST_API, docs.veracode.com/r/t_dynamic_ISM. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Veracode DAST's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Veracode DAST, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Veracode DAST by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Veracode DAST is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Veracode DAST, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.