AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Postman · October 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Postman

88Judge labels
12First choices
16Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
8% in API management for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 61 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 6% of its 16 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Postman →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Postman for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
API managementDeveloper platform5%6 of 616%16accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
API security platformsSecurity operations2%14 of 9318%11accepted challenger

Movement

Since September 2026, Postman held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.

Best category · API management · by segment

Small business▼−7Since September 2026: 17% → 10%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
10%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 4 pointsRank 2 → 5 of 51
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 6 of 50
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 39 → 13 of 71

All categories · Mid-market

CategorySeptember 2026NowChangeReadingRank
API management2%5%▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Within noiseRank 8 → 6 of 61
API security0%2%newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 2% now.New this editionRank 14 of 93, unchanged

Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.

The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions

By model

How each model treated Postman across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502103
GPT-5.4 mini10001
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar01102
Grok 4.2001102
Mistral Small11204
DeepSeek V4 Flash02103
Llama 4 Maverick00202
Qwen 3.7 Flash10113
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX10023
MiniMax M2.502002
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct13 labels2
Paraphrase16 labels5
Comparative18 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained21 labels5
Scale-constrained6 labelsNone
Negative14 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative88 labels in all, every segment counted; 12 of the 17 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“The Best Overall: Postman (Free Tier) ... Start with Postman. It is the lowest barrier to entry” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“### 1. Best All-in-One Lifecycle & Portal: Postman API Platform” Qwen 3.7 Flash · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Postman Enterprise as the best default choice” GPT-5.4 mini · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Postman is the safest bet for a mid-sized B2B company.” Mistral Small · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“these are not dedicated API security platforms. Using them as your sole line of defense is a mistake” Qwen 3.7 Flash · API security · negative prompt · hard negative
“Do not rely on Postman for real-time threat blocking or continuous monitoring of production traffic.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API security · negative prompt · hard negative
“less ideal as a primary enterprise gateway for production traffic” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API management · comparative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Postman, over the 88 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Postman was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform31 of 880Not among the top eight
Apidog16 of 883Not among the top eight
WSO2 API Manager15 of 881Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Postman. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 81 of the 88 answers that named Postman and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

g2.com49
zuplo.com38
integrate.io34
astera.com24
learn.g2.com23
gravitee.io20
radware.com19
spotsaas.com19
peerspot.com18
technologyadvice.com18

262 of the 262 domain citations in answers naming Postman came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

postman.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Postman takes 5% of first choices and Kong Gateway takes 37%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “api management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “api management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“postman”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
7,676 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 221,855 a month
Searches its site ranks for
20,116 · 2,629 in the top three
Sites linking to it
50,813
Paid Google search
2 searches its ads show for, about 7 clicks and $0 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 66 image, 43 text, 11 video · 29 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2024, as Postman Inc, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 96 in the year, 24 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
5%
rank 6 of 61 in API management
Segment leader
37%
Kong Gateway
First choices
12 across its categories
Named in
88 answers
Its own site cited
in 81 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on postman.com
24,495
subdomains included
Content
1,471
counted in the table below
Documentation
9,727
Product · Integration
29 · 8
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,064442026-09-25API gateways, API management
Glossary or explainer12002026-01-06API gateways
Conference or event7702026-06-09
Comparison7712026-09-17
Report or ebook4902022-05-10
News or press32undated
Webinar or virtual event2202023-06-09
Template or tool1802020-10-28
Podcast or video11undated
Case study1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page postman.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Postman

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Postman; a claim can dispute any of them.
Postman Enterprise 6Postman API Platform 3Postman / SwaggerHub 1

Follow Postman

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Postman is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
The AI-native API Platform
For
Built for engineers. Designed for enterprise scale.
Price stated
Plans and Pricing postman.com
Free plan or trial
Sign Up for Free postman.com
Not stated on the pages read
Starting price, integrations, certifications, hosting, customers

What Postman's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: postman.com, postman.com/plansky686, postman.com/fge555/security/overview, postman.com/iqpir/product/overview, postman.com/api-envia/ecartapi-com-public-workspace/request/xhknzyj/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Postman's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Postman, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Postman by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Postman is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Postman, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at postman.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.