Every category where a model named Rapid7 InsightAppSec for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant	Since September 2026
Dynamic application security testing	Developer platform	0%	15 of 58	16%	19	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Rapid7 InsightAppSec yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Rapid7 InsightAppSec across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.

ShowHide

Model	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	1	0	1
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	2	0	3
Mistral Small	0	1	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	0	2
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	2	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	1	0	0	1
GPT-6 Luna	1	0	0	1
Muse Glimmer 30B	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct6 labelsNone

Paraphrase6 labelsNone

Comparative14 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained7 labels1

Scale-constrained10 labelsNone

Negative13 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative56 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best for mid-market enterprises prioritizing user experience, developer collaboration, and compliance requirements” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAST · direct prompt · alternative

“If you're API-heavy and need compliance support, Rapid7 InsightAppSec is worth the premium.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAST · direct prompt · alternative

“Cloud-based, scalable, strong analytics and integration with Rapid7's broader platform” MiniMax M2.5 · DAST · direct prompt · alternative

“Best for: Enterprises wanting DAST integrated with a broader security platform” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAST · comparative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Legacy solutions like Qualys DAST and Rapid7 have become outdated. They burden teams with false positives, manual setups, and limited remediation guidance.” Muse Glimmer 30B · DAST · negative prompt · hard negative

“teams that cannot afford enterprise-grade commercial tools like Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan, or Rapid7” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAST · budget prompt · soft negative

“Reported issues with authentication handling, limited CI/CD integration compared to modern alternatives” Kimi K2 · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Rapid7 InsightAppSec, over the 56 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Rapid7 InsightAppSec was named but was not.

ShowHide

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Invicti45 of 5623Not among the top eight

OWASP ZAP33 of 565Not among the top eight

Burp Suite30 of 561Not among the top eight

Acunetix29 of 562Not among the top eight

HCL AppScan26 of 560Not among the top eight

StackHawk23 of 564Not among the top eight

Veracode DAST21 of 562Not among the top eight

Checkmarx DAST20 of 560Not among the top eight

Qualys WAS16 of 560Not among the top eight

Checkmarx One15 of 561Not among the top eight

A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Rapid7 InsightAppSec. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 56 answers that named Rapid7 InsightAppSec and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com35

augmentcode.com32

invicti.com28

beaglesecurity.com26

stackhawk.com26

aikido.dev25

checkmarx.com25

appsecsanta.com22

cyberpress.org20

aimultiple.com19

258 of the 258 domain citations in answers naming Rapid7 InsightAppSec came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

getastra.com/blog/dast/tools35

augmentcode.com/tools/best-dast-tools-for-enterprise-security32

stackhawk.com/blog/dynamic-application-security-testing-tools-comparison25

checkmarx.com/learn/dast/dast-tools-key-features-and-12-solutions-to-know-in-202618

aikido.dev/blog/top-dynamic-application-security-testing-dast-tools17

aimultiple.com/dast-tools17

cyberpress.org/dast-tools-by-use-case17

getautonoma.com/blog/dast-tools17

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

Where Rapid7 InsightAppSec stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.

ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates

Searches for its name, Google: 50 a month (“rapid7 insightappsec”)
AI search demand for its name, est.: 1 a month
Its own site: It sits on Rapid7's site (rapid7.com), so there are no site figures for it alone

In answers

This edition

Share of first choices

rank 15 of 58 in DAST

Segment leader

29%

OWASP ZAP

First choices: 1 across its categories
Named in: 56 answers
Its own site cited: in 50 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

Names read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Rapid7 InsightAppSec; a claim can dispute any of them.

Rapid7 3

Follow Rapid7 InsightAppSec

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Rapid7 is the company behind Rapid7 InsightAppSec.

ShowHide

On record

Company records

Also from Rapid7: Rapid7 ASM, Rapid7 AppSec Platform, Rapid7 Exposure Command, Rapid7 Incident Command, Rapid7 InsightCloudSec, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Rapid7 InsightIDR, Rapid7 InsightIDR Deception and 8 more

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked

Positioning: providing Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) for mature and maturing Application Security professionals
docs.rapid7.com/insightappsec
For: mature and maturing Application Security professionals
docs.rapid7.com/insightappsec
Certifications: PCI-DSSHIPAASOXOWASP Top Ten
Not stated on the pages read: Price, starting price, free plan or trial, integrations, hosting, customers

What Rapid7 InsightAppSec's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: docs.rapid7.com/insightappsec, docs.rapid7.com/insightappsec/rbac, docs.rapid7.com/insightappsec/graphql, rapid7.com/products/insightappsec, docs.rapid7.com/insightappsec/concepts. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Rapid7 InsightAppSec's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Rapid7 InsightAppSec by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

where Rapid7 InsightAppSec is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
who was chosen in the answers that did not name Rapid7 InsightAppSec, and every reason the record gives;
a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.