Small business▲+2Since September 2026: 6% → 8%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
8%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 9 pointsRank 3 of 93, unchanged
3 categories · RankedDetectify
92Judge labels
8First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
7% in ASM for small business buyers
Rank 6 of 100 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 20 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Detectify →By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small business3 of 99
7%30 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market6 of 100
4%20 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise38 of 89
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
In asm · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Detectify for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 4% | 6 of 100 | 5% | 20 | accepted challenger | ▼−4Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Dynamic application security testing | Developer platform | 0% | 16 of 58 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29% | |
| Client-side protection | Security operations | 0% | 51 of 120 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by cside at 13% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Detectify held within the floor in all three categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · ASM · by segment
Mid-market▼−4Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 7% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 3 → 6 of 98
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 60 → 58 of 81
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASM | 7% | 2% | ▼−4Since September 2026: 7% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 6 of 100 |
| DAST | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 16 of 58, unchanged |
| Client-side protection | 0% | 0% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. | New this edition | Rank 51 of 120, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Detectify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Detectify across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 3 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct16 labels1
Paraphrase16 labels3
Comparative22 labels1not counted in share
Budget-constrained19 labels2
Scale-constrained4 labels2
Negative15 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative92 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 9 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Detectify or Intruder: Excellent EASM tools geared towards SMBs and mid-market teams... low management overhead.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · ASM · scale prompt · first choice
“Intruder or Detectify are the most commonly recommended mid-market-first EASM platforms” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Other options to consider are Detectify and other commercial DAST tools that offer a range of pricing plans.” Llama 4 Maverick · DAST · budget prompt · alternative
“Detectify is a Swedish EASM platform primarily geared toward small and medium-sized businesses” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASM · paraphrase prompt · alternative
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Per-domain pricing; can get expensive as you scale” Kimi K2 · ASM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Detectify, over the 92 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Detectify was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Detectify, over the 92 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Detectify was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Detectify. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 92 of the 92 answers that named Detectify and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
attaxion.com37
g2.com33
getastra.com28
synack.com27
guideflow.com25
intruder.io25
thectoclub.com25
beaglesecurity.com23
expertinsights.com23
aikido.dev22
268 of the 268 domain citations in answers naming Detectify came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
detectify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Detectify takes 4% of first choices and Intruder takes 49%.ShowHide
Search and answers
detectify.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Detectify takes 4% of first choices and Intruder takes 49%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “attack surface management platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “attack surface management platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 590 a month (“detectify”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 1,393 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 822 · 10 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 3,287
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
4%
rank 6 of 100 in ASM
Segment leader
49%
Intruder
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 92 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 92 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on detectify.com
737
subdomains included
Content
523
counted in the table below
Documentation
119
Product · Integration
24 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 371 | 4 | 2026-08-19 | ASM, WAF | |
| News or press | 53 | 2 | 2026-09-24 | ASM | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 35 | 1 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Report or ebook | 18 | 0 | 2025-10-07 | ASM | |
| Comparison | 15 | 0 | 2026-06-11 | ||
| Podcast or video | 14 | 0 | 2022-03-17 | ||
| Case study | 10 | 2 | 2026-09-25 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 6 | undated | ASM | ||
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-25Gov uk dsit case study
- 2026-09-25Dual appsec webinar webinar or virtual event
- 2026-09-24Detectify positioned as a major player in the 2026 idc marketscape for dynamic application security testing dast news or press
- 2026-09-24Detectify positioned as a major player in the idc marketscape for worldwide dynamic application security testing news or press
- 2026-09-17Alloy case study
- 2026-08-19Shadow it security and why visibility beats another approval process blog
Events in person
Last twelve months
- October 28, 2026 to October 29, 2026Cyber Security Nordic 2026Helsinki, Finland · attended
As the event pages on detectify.com state them, read September 28, 2026.
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page detectify.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Detectify
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Detectify is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Detectify is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Application security platform built and trusted by hackers
- For
- security teams
- Price stated
- Plans start from €90/month for Application Scanning and €302/month for Surface Monitoring. detectify.com
- Starting price
- €90/month detectify.com
- Free plan or trial
- Start a trial detectify.com
- Integrations claimed
- 3 detectify.com
- Certifications
- ISO 27001GDPR
- Customers named
- evrocalloyauth0buhler-groupkivragov-uk-dsittradesolutionabc-fitness
- Not stated on the pages read
- Hosting
What Detectify's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: detectify.com, detectify.com/pricing, detectify.com/product/alfred-ai, detectify.com/resources/customers, detectify.com/product/integrations. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Detectify's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Detectify, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Detectify by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Detectify is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Detectify, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.