Dynamic application security testing for small business buyers
Asked as “DAST tool”, and as “dynamic web application security scanner”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
43%
Clear leader
43OWASP ZAP16Intruder12StackHawk29others
43% of first choices, clear leader.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Show the five products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
For buyers
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
OWASP ZAP vs Bright SecurityOWASP ZAP vs IntruderOWASP ZAP vs Burp SuiteOWASP ZAP vs Aikido SecurityInvicti vs AcunetixInvicti vs StackHawkInvicti vs Bright SecurityInvicti vs IntruderInvicti vs Burp SuiteInvicti vs Aikido SecurityAcunetix vs StackHawkAcunetix vs Bright SecurityAcunetix vs IntruderAcunetix vs Burp SuiteAcunetix vs Aikido SecurityStackHawk vs Bright SecurityStackHawk vs IntruderStackHawk vs Burp SuiteStackHawk vs Aikido SecurityBright Security vs IntruderBright Security vs Burp SuiteBright Security vs Aikido SecurityIntruder vs Burp SuiteIntruder vs Aikido SecurityBurp Suite vs Aikido Security
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10B11
12Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01OWASP ZAP43%
OWASP ZAP43%02Intruder16%
Intruder16%03StackHawk12%
StackHawk12%04Acunetix9%
Acunetix9%05Invicti5%
Invicti5%06Astra Security4%
Astra Security4%07Detectify2%
Detectify2%08Nuclei0%
Nuclei0%09Beagle Security0%
Beagle Security0%10Aikido Security0%
Aikido Security0%11Burp Suite0%
12HCL AppScan0%
HCL AppScan0%What they warned about
Three of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Burp Suite
44%
18 of 41 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Starts at ~$5,000/year and scales significantly with crawl concurrency. Generally out of reach for most small businesses” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
Invicti43%
12 of 28 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Enterprise-focused with quote-based pricing, best suited for large organizations with 300+ apps.” MiniMax M2.5, negative prompt
HCL AppScan80%
8 of 10 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“Avoid heavy enterprise legacy tools (like Micro Focus Fortify or HCL AppScan), which require a dedicated team to run.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, scale prompt
OWASP ZAP17%
12 of 70 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“ZAP is known to produce more false positives than other DAST tools on this list, and it lacks enterprise-grade automation” Claude Haiku 4.5, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 968 links across 162 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
51 answers · 62 citations · 12 models
vendor site · StackHawk39 answers · 46 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Escape38 answers · 47 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Beagle Security33 answers · 50 citations · 12 models
29 answers · 29 citations · 12 models
28 answers · 33 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Aikido27 answers · 33 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Checkmarx25 answers · 29 citations · 9 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
24 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Safeguard21 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Invicti19 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
48 answers · 12 models
34 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 12 models
25 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 12 models
22 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 11 models
18 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best dast tool”, “dast tool”, “dast tools”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OWASP ZAP owasp.org | 43% | 177 | 3,600 | 122 | 365,222 | 1 | ||
| Intruder intruder.io | 16% | 231 | 27,100 | 8,557 | 49,562 | 43 | ||
| StackHawk stackhawk.com | 12% | 142 | 590 | 10 | 8,458 | 8 | 6 | |
| Acunetix acunetix.com | 9% | 113 | 880 | 43 | 15,291 | 10 | ||
| Invicti invicti.com Invicti 5%, Invicti Web + API 4% | 9% | 137 | 90,500 | 83 | 54,568 | $50 | 24 | |
| Astra getastra.com Astra Security 4% | 4% | 90 | 590 | 20 | 60,832 company | $17,489 | 75 | |
| Detectify detectify.com | 2% | 92 | 590 | 4 | 1,393 | 15 | ||
| Edgescan edgescan.com | 2% | 5 | ||||||
| Snyk snyk.io | 2% | 143 | 12,100 | 581 | 61,651 | 60 | 1 | |
| Snyk API & Web | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 5 of them are among the sites the models cited here (checkmarx.com, escape.tech, getautonoma.com, safeguard.sh, stackhawk.com). The first result for “best dast tool” is snyk.io.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best DAST tool for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which dynamic web application security scanner would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top DAST tools for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best DAST tool for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a DAST tool. What should we look at?”Negative“Which DAST tools should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5IntruderOWASP ZAPChangedAikido Security, StackHawkAstra Securityno first choiceagainst: AppCheck, Astra Security, Checkmarx One, OWASP ZAP, PortSwigger Burp Suite Enterprise, Qualys WAS, Traceable, Veracode DAST
Three alternatives
Acunetix, Aikido Security, OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Qualys Web Application ScanningThree alternatives
Acunetix, Intruder, OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
Acunetix, Intruder, OWASP ZAPGPT-5.4 miniInvicti Web + API, OWASP ZAPagainst: Burp SuiteInvicti Web + APIChangedOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPagainst: OWASP Nettackerno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite
Two alternatives
Burp Suite, OWASP ZAPFour alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Invicti, StackHawkOne alternative
EscapeGemini 3.5 FlashStackHawkagainst: Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Veracode DASTSnyk API & WebChangedOWASP ZAP, StackHawkOWASP ZAPagainst: Invicti, Veracode DASTStackHawkagainst: HCL AppScan, OWASP ZAP, OpenText Fortifyagainst: Black Duck Continuous Dynamic, Burp Suite, HCL AppScan DAST, OWASP ZAP, OpenText Fortify WebInspect, Veracode DAST
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Astra Security, EscapeThree alternatives
Astra Security, Intruder, StackHawkThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Escape, NucleiFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Burp Suite, Nuclei, StackHawkFour alternatives
Bright Security, Burp Suite, Nuclei, ProbelyPerplexity SonarStackHawkIntruderChangedOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Astra Security, Burp Suite, Intruder, Invicti, Netsparker, Traceable
Three alternatives
Acunetix, Detectify, OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
Acunetix, Detectify, OWASP ZAPFive alternatives
Aikido Security, Detectify, Intruder, Invicti, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Acunetix, StackHawkGrok 4.1 FastOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite, Checkmarx One, Veracode DASTOWASP ZAPHeldagainst: Acunetix, InvictiOWASP ZAP, StackHawkOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite, NiktoOWASP ZAPagainst: Checkmarx One, HCL AppScan, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Rapid7 InsightAppSecagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, Invicti, Qualys WAS, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Tenable.io WAS
Three alternatives
Acunetix, Intruder, StackHawkThree alternatives
Intruder, Nuclei, ProbelyThree alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, IntruderOne alternative
NucleiFive alternatives
Acunetix, Beagle Security, Intruder, Invicti, StackHawkMistral SmallAcunetix, OWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPChangedAikido Security, StackHawkOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Checkmarx DAST, Fortify WebInspect, OpenVAS
One alternative
EdgescanTwo alternatives
Astra Security, ImmuniWebFour alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Jit, OWASP ZAPOne alternative
NucleiDeepSeek V4 FlashIntruderIntruderHeldagainst: OWASP ZAPIntruder, OWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPIntruderagainst: Acunetix, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, Veracode DASTagainst: Aikido Security, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Qualys Web Application Scanning, StackHawk, Veracode DAST
Two alternatives
Beagle Security, OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
Acunetix, Beagle Security, InvictiFour alternatives
Acunetix, Aikido Security, Detectify, StackHawkThree alternatives
Detectify, Nuclei, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Astra Security, StackHawkLlama 4 MaverickAcunetixDetectifyChangedIntruderOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST
One alternative
AcunetixTwo alternatives
Beagle Security, OpenVASFour alternatives
Aikido Security, Detectify, Intruder, StackHawkQwen 3.7 FlashInvicti, Snykagainst: Burp SuiteAcunetixChangedIntruderOWASP ZAPagainst: Arachni, Checkmarx One, Veracode DASTAstra Securityagainst: Burp Suite, Invicti, OWASP ZAPagainst: Acunetix, Burp Suite, HCL AppScan, OWASP ZAP, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Tenable.io WAS, Veritas
One alternative
OWASP ZAPTwo alternatives
OWASP ZAP, StackHawkThree alternatives
Invicti, OWASP ZAP, StackHawkOne alternative
Tenable NessusTwo alternatives
Acunetix, StackHawkKimi K2StackHawkagainst: Burp SuiteIntruder, StackHawkChangedagainst: OWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPIntruder, StackHawkagainst: Burp Suite Enterprise Edition, HCL AppScan, Invicti, Older Qualys WAS, OpenText Fortify WebInspect, Tenable Web App Scanning, Veracode DAST
Three alternatives
Aikido Security, Intruder, OWASP ZAPOne alternative
DetectifyThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Invicti, StackHawkThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Detectify, StackHawkTwo alternatives
Acunetix, OWASP ZAPGLM 4.7 FlashXOWASP ZAPIntruderChangedNuclei, OWASP ZAPagainst: Tenable NessusOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite, WapitiIntruder, StackHawkagainst: Burp Suite, Burp Suite DAST, Tenable Nessus
Three alternatives
Burp Suite, Detectify, StackHawkOne alternative
OWASP ZAPThree alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, StackHawk WingmanTwo alternatives
Nuclei, StackHawkMiniMax M2.5Acunetix, EdgescanAcunetix, InvictiChangedOWASP ZAPagainst: AcunetixOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Astra Security, Burp Suite, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, Invicti, OWASP ZAP, Qualys WAS, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Tenable.io WAS, Traceable
One alternative
Checkmarx OneOne alternative
DetectifyTwo alternatives
Burp Suite, InvictiFour alternatives
Burp Suite, Nuclei, StackHawk Wingman, WapitiGPT-6 LunaOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suite DASTOWASP ZAPHeldOWASP ZAPagainst: InvictiOWASP ZAPno first choiceagainst: Burp Suite DAST, OWASP ZAP, Skipfish
One alternative
StackHawkOne alternative
StackHawkThree alternatives
Burp Suite, Detectify, ProbelyOne alternative
StackHawkMuse Glimmer 30BOWASP ZAPInvictiChangedagainst: Burp SuiteOWASP ZAPOWASP ZAPagainst: Burp Suiteno first choiceagainst: Astra Security, Checkmarx DAST, HCL AppScan, Harness, Invicti, Netsparker, Qualys WAS, Rapid7 InsightAppSec, Tenable.io WAS, Traceable
Four alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Intruder, InvictiTwo alternatives
Acunetix, OWASP ZAPSix alternatives
Acunetix, Burp Suite, Detectify, Intruder, Invicti, NucleiTwo alternatives
Astra Security, InvictiBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:41 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:51 | yes | 4 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 17 | 30 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:14 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 21 | 40 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:41 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 13 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:40 | yes | 5 | 21 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 22:11 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 14 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:13 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:01 | yes | 16 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:45 | yes | 18 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:55 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:08 | yes | 24 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 10 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:54 | yes | 5 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:13 | yes | 20 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:44 | yes | 20 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:11 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:02 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 14 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:42 | yes | 13 | 13 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:30 | yes | 13 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 21 | 4 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 21 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 23 | 53 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:05 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:58 | yes | 16 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:44 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:03 | yes | 15 | 49 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 25 | 47 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:47 | yes | 7 | 31 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:48 | yes | 15 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 9 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 14 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 23 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:40 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:54 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:16 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:02 | no | 0 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 9 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 23:50 | yes | 24 | 50 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 5 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:38 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 14 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:57 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:43 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:48 | no | 0 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 16 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:27 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:29 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 22:58 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:52 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:41 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:36 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:02 | yes | 3 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:54 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 23:02 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 3 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-04 22:39 | yes | 9 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 23:14 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-04 23:59 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:59 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:31 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:55 | yes | 20 | 74 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:42 | yes | 23 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:38 | yes | 24 | 48 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 10 | 61 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:21 | yes | 4 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:57 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Aikido read as Aikido Security
Astra read as Astra Security
Checkmarx read as Checkmarx One
Checkmarx (webgoat) read as Checkmarx One
Qualys read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Qualys Web App Scanning (WAS) read as Qualys Web Application Scanning
Rapid7 read as Rapid7 InsightAppSec
Veracode read as Veracode DAST
Veracode Dynamic Analysis read as Veracode DAST
Unresolved, counted raw
Blacksight
HCL AppScan DAST
OWASP Nettacker
Older Qualys WAS
Snyk API & Web (formerly Probely)
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.