AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › StackHawk · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

StackHawk

147Judge labels
21First choices
10Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in DAST for small business buyers
Rank 4 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 3% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of StackHawk →
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named StackHawk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Dynamic application security testingDeveloper platform8%4 of 583%30accepted challenger
API security platformsSecurity operations4%9 of 935%19accepted challenger
Application security posture managementDeveloper platform2%11 of 700%6under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 37%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for StackHawk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated StackHawk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.502204
GPT-5.4 mini00011
Gemini 3.5 Flash06208
Perplexity Sonar02103
Grok 4.20153110
Mistral Small02002
DeepSeek V4 Flash12104
Llama 4 Maverick10001
Qwen 3.7 Flash13004
Kimi K221306
GLM 4.7 FlashX13004
MiniMax M2.511103
GPT-6 Luna02002
Muse Glimmer 30B02103

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct26 labels11
Paraphrase15 labels2
Comparative41 labels5not counted in share
Budget-constrained27 labels3
Scale-constrained16 labels5
Negative22 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative147 labels in all, every segment counted; 21 of the 30 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Best Overall Value (Automated Testing): StackHawk ... widely considered the best balance of cost and capability for startups and SMBs” Qwen 3.7 Flash · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“For most mid-market B2B companies, StackHawk offers the best balance of features, pricing, and developer experience.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · DAST · direct prompt · first choice
“StackHawk - a developer-centric CI/CD DAST on a budget, with a free tier and paid plans starting at $59/mo.” Llama 4 Maverick · API security · budget prompt · first choice
“Top Recommendation for Mid-Sized B2B: Stackhawk” MiniMax M2.5 · ASPM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“tools like StackHawk are built on ZAP, but they're not the cheapest option for a tight budget” GPT-5.4 mini · DAST · budget prompt · soft negative
“If you outgrow them, scale to affordable paid like StackHawk.” Grok 4.20 · API security · budget prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as StackHawk, over the 147 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and StackHawk was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Beagle Security25 of 1471Not among the top eight
Rapid7 InsightAppSec23 of 1470Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named StackHawk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 142 of the 147 answers that named StackHawk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

stackhawk.comYour site78
getastra.com76
beaglesecurity.com72
escape.tech63
appsecsanta.com53
aikido.dev50
getautonoma.com42
checkmarx.com40
radware.com37
augmentcode.com35

468 of the 546 domain citations in answers naming StackHawk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

stackhawk.com ranks 6 on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, StackHawk takes 8% of first choices and OWASP ZAP takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “dast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “dast tools”
6
Searches for its name, Google
590 a month (“stackhawk”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
10 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 8,458 a month
Searches its site ranks for
2,689 · 162 in the top three
Sites linking to it
2,377
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
22 ads · 17 text, 5 video · 8 shown in the last 30 days

First shown October 2021, as StackHawk, Inc., verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 11 in the year, 11 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
8%
rank 4 of 58 in DAST
Segment leader
29%
OWASP ZAP
First choices
21 across its categories
Named in
147 answers
Its own site cited
in 142 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on stackhawk.com
655
subdomains included
Content
456
counted in the table below
Documentation
145
Product · Integration
19 · 7
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog337undatedSAST, SOAR
Report or ebook35undatedSOAR
Webinar or virtual event20undated
Case study17undated
Comparison15undatedSAST
Glossary or explainer15undatedSAST
News or press11undated
Podcast or video3undated
Conference or event2undatedSAST
Template or tool1undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page stackhawk.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as StackHawk

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as StackHawk; a claim can dispute any of them.
Stackhawk 1

Follow StackHawk

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

StackHawk is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
AI Coding Agent Security Platform
For
coding agents
Price stated
$10/user/mo. stackhawk.com/pricing
Starting price
$10/user/mo. stackhawk.com/pricing
Free plan or trial
Get started - Free 14 day trial stackhawk.com/pricing
Certifications
SOC 2 Type 2
Hosting
US us-west-2US
Customers named
ITVHagertyChange.orgBreathe Life
Not stated on the pages read
Integrations

What StackHawk's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: stackhawk.com, stackhawk.com/pricing, trust.stackhawk.com, stackhawk.com/platform, stackhawk.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when StackHawk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as StackHawk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for StackHawk by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where StackHawk is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name StackHawk, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at stackhawk.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.