Every category where a model named Gravitee for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
API management	Developer platform	11%	3 of 55	0%	21	accepted challenger
API gateways	Developer platform	0%	12 of 51	0%	6	under 10 labels · led by Kong Gateway at 61%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Gravitee yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Gravitee across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	1	0	2	3
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	2	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	2	0	2
Mistral Small	0	0	1	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	2	0	3	5
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	2	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	0	0	0
Kimi K2	1	1	1	3
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	2	0	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct7 labelsNone

Paraphrase7 labels2

Comparative24 labelsNone

Budget-constrained18 labels5

Scale-constrained8 labelsNone

Negative10 labels1not counted in share

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative74 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Gravitee's Community Edition is famously generous... Gives you a free developer portal, policy UI, and basic analytics that competitors charge thousands for.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · API management · budget prompt · first choice

“Start here — Gravitee (open source first, then managed) for a complete lifecycle + portal at predictable mid-market pricing.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Go with Gravitee (most complete open-source feature set) or Kong OSS” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API management · budget prompt · first choice

“Go with Gravitee if you want: - Predictable costs for budgeting” Kimi K2 · API management · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Gravitee, over the 74 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Gravitee was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Kong Gateway70 of 7418Compare →

Amazon API Gateway62 of 743Not in the top three

Tyk57 of 747Compare →

Apigee51 of 7411Not in the top three

Azure API Management41 of 741Not in the top three

MuleSoft Anypoint Platform37 of 740Not in the top three

Zuplo33 of 7413Not in the top three

IBM API Connect18 of 741Not in the top three

Apache APISIX17 of 742Not in the top three

WSO2 API Manager15 of 740Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Gravitee. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 62 of the 74 answers that named Gravitee and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zuplo.com39

gravitee.ioYour site33

digitalapi.ai30

moesif.com29

api7.ai25

g2.com25

integrate.io24

dupple.com19

gartner.com19

reddit.com19

229 of the 262 domain citations in answers naming Gravitee came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

integrate.io/blog/api-management-tools24

moesif.com/blog/technical/api-development/Top-API-Managers23

dupple.com/learn/best-api-gateways19

gartner.com/reviews/market/api-management18

geekflare.com/guides/best-api-gateways18

reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/1s36hm2/best_api_management_tools_for_smaller_companies17

g2.com/categories/api-management/small-business14

improvado.io/blog/top-api-management-tools14

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Gravitee

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Gravitee; a claim can dispute any of them.

Gravitee.io 5Gravitee Cloud 1Gravitee Community Edition 1Gravitee.io (Community Edition) 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Gravitee's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Gravitee, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at gravitee.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.