IT AI Index

Index › Vendors › Burp Suite · September 2026 Edition

2 categories · Named, not ranked

Burp Suite

3Judge labels

0First choices

1Negative labels

3 of 12Models named it

2Categories

September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.

Standing

2 labels, too few to rank

A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Burp Suite was named 2 times in PTaaS and 1 other category, where Cobalt led with 44%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.

By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.

Small businessnot named

No model named it for this buyer.

Mid-market60 of 76

under the label threshold

Enterprise54 of 73

under the label threshold

In ptaas · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Burp Suite for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Penetration testing as a service	Security operations	0%	60 of 76	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 44%
Vulnerability management platforms	Security operations	0%	78 of 80	100%	1	under 10 labels · led by Rapid7 InsightVM at 45%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Burp Suite yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Burp Suite across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	0	0
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	0	0
Mistral Small	0	0	0
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	0	0	0
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	0	1
MiniMax M2.5	0	0	0

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct0 labelsNone

Paraphrase0 labelsNone

Comparative0 labelsNone

Budget-constrained1 labelNone

Scale-constrained0 labelsNone

Negative2 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative3 labels in all, every segment counted; 0 of the 0 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

No positive label carried a quote.

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“What to avoid: Tools like OWASP ZAP or Burp Suite Community.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · Vuln management · negative prompt · hard negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Burp Suite, over the 3 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Burp Suite was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

OWASP ZAP2 of 30Not in the top three

Bishop Fox1 of 31Not in the top three

Bug Circuit1 of 31Not in the top three

NetSPI1 of 31Not in the top three

TurboPentest1 of 31Not in the top three

Affordable Pentesting1 of 30Not in the top three

Breacon1 of 30Not in the top three

Cobalt1 of 30Not in the top three

Cobalt Strike1 of 30Not in the top three

Iru Vulnerability Management1 of 30Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Burp Suite. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 3 of the 3 answers that named Burp Suite and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

reddit.com3

pentestingproviders.com2

affordablepentesting.com1

aikido.dev1

axis-intelligence.com1

beaglesecurity.com1

bishopfox.com1

bluevoyant.com1

bugcircuit.com1

cyberfortify.co1

Thirteen of the thirteen domain citations in answers naming Burp Suite came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

affordablepentesting.com/1

affordablepentesting.com/compliance/soc-2-help1

affordablepentesting.com/post/cyber-security-for-startups1

affordablepentesting.com/post/low-cost-penetration-testing1

affordablepentesting.com/post/penetration-testing-best-practices1

affordablepentesting.com/post/soc-2-audit1

affordablepentesting.com/post/soc-2-penetration-testing1

aikido.dev/blog/top-automated-penetration-testing-tools1

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Burp Suite

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Burp Suite; a claim can dispute any of them.

Burp Suite Community 1Burp Suite Community Edition 1

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Burp Suite's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Burp Suite, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at burp.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.