| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application security posture management | Developer platform | 37% | 1 of 70 | 9% | 35 | endorsed leader | |
| API security platforms | Security operations | 12% | 1 of 93 | 0% | 7 | under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12% | |
| Cloud-native application protection | Cloud and infrastructure | 6% | 4 of 70 | 0% | 10 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Static application security testing | Developer platform | 2% | 8 of 71 | 0% | 8 | under 10 labels · led by Semgrep at 36% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 4% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Dynamic application security testing | Developer platform | 2% | 10 of 58 | 0% | 11 | accepted challenger | |
| Software composition analysis | Developer platform | 2% | 12 of 50 | 17% | 6 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 31% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Container and Kubernetes security | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 13 of 77 | 0% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Trivy at 22% | ▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Cloud security posture management | Cloud and infrastructure | 0% | 16 of 80 | 0% | 4 | under 10 labels · led by Wiz at 37% | ▼−6Since September 2026: 6% → 0%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Attack surface management | Security operations | 0% | 91 of 100 | 67% | 3 | under 10 labels · led by Intruder at 49% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| AI security platforms | Security operations | 0% | 147 of 233 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by SentinelOne Singularity at 11% | |
| Penetration testing as a service | Security operations | 0% | 57 of 82 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now. |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 3 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 6 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 13 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 5 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 8 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 6 |
| Mistral Small | 2 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 7 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 3 | 1 | 4 | 0 | 8 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 5 | 0 | 1 | 7 |
| Kimi K2 | 3 | 5 | 2 | 0 | 10 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 0 | 5 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 4 | 3 | 1 | 8 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Aikido Security - an all-in-one ASPM platform with native scanning for IaC, SAST, DAST, SCA, container scanning, secrets detection, and CSPM.” Llama 4 Maverick · ASPM · direct prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend Aikido Security if you want the best balance of API discovery, protection, and operational simplicity in one platform.” Perplexity Sonar · API security · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“Aikido Security is an all-in-one ASPM platform designed especially for startups and mid-sized development teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · ASPM · budget prompt · first choice
“For a small company that wants one affordable, mostly all-in-one AppSec platform, I'd start with Aikido.” GPT-6 Luna · ASPM · budget prompt · first choice
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Users note the lack of advanced features in Aikido Security, such as dark mode and in-depth analysis options, and find the pricing structure expensive for micro businesses” Muse Glimmer 30B · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Users report lack of advanced features (e.g., no dark mode, limited deep-analysis options). May not scale well for complex enterprise needs.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · ASPM · negative prompt · soft negative
“best for smaller teams or simpler environments, less ideal as the primary pick for a typical mid-market company” Perplexity Sonar · ASPM · direct prompt · soft negative
“be wary of smaller vendors (like Aikido) that promise enterprise features but lack the depth” GLM 4.7 FlashX · ASM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 342 of the 342 answers that named Aikido Security and are not a share of its labels.
924 of the 1,126 domain citations in answers naming Aikido Security came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
What Aikido Security's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: aikido.dev/use-cases/cybersecurity, aikido.dev/comparison/aikido-vs-novee-security, aikido.dev/comparison/aikido-vs-contrast-security, help.aikido.dev/getting-started/core-functionalities/aikido-security-checks, help.aikido.dev/aikido-device-protection/miscellaneous-aikido-endpoint/endpoint-information-for-support. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Aikido Security's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Aikido Security, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Aikido Security by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
AI models recommend Aikido Security first in Application security posture management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
AI models recommend Aikido Security first in API security platforms this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.