AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › Invicti · October 2026 Edition
3 categories · Ranked

Invicti

143Judge labels
45First choices
20Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
3Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
62% in DAST for enterprise buyers
Rank 2 of 58 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 43 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Invicti →
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In dast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Invicti for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Dynamic application security testingDeveloper platform20%2 of 585%43accepted challenger
Penetration testing as a serviceSecurity operations0%27 of 820%2under 10 labels · led by Cobalt at 45%=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
API security platformsSecurity operations0%65 of 930%1under 10 labels · led by Aikido Security at 12%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Invicti yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Invicti across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510113
GPT-5.4 mini11002
Gemini 3.5 Flash12104
Perplexity Sonar11002
Grok 4.2030115
Mistral Small11002
DeepSeek V4 Flash13004
Llama 4 Maverick00101
Qwen 3.7 Flash03104
Kimi K233107
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.520204
GPT-6 Luna12003
Muse Glimmer 30B21003

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct27 labels17
Paraphrase28 labels16
Comparative36 labels15not counted in share
Budget-constrained15 labels8
Scale-constrained16 labels4
Negative21 labels3not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative143 labels in all, every segment counted; 45 of the 63 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Invicti is considered the best DAST tool for most mid-market enterprises, with proof-based scanning that eliminates false-positive triage” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAST · direct prompt · first choice
“Combines DAST with IAST, excels at identifying vulnerabilities in web apps and APIs, and is known for high accuracy and low false positives.” Mistral Small · DAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“commercial tools like Burp Suite Professional and Invicti catch more vulnerability types than open-source alternatives” MiniMax M2.5 · DAST · comparative prompt · first choice
“Leaders like Invicti... score higher on accuracy (proof-based scanning), CI/CD integration, and API/SPA support.” Grok 4.20 · DAST · negative prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Invicti has had GUI scan bugs observed at times and slows down while scanning large applications” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“Quote-only (enterprise skew) | Exploit confirmation; scales well but pricier” Grok 4.20 · DAST · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Invicti, over the 142 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Invicti was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Veracode DAST45 of 1421Not among the top eight
Rapid7 InsightAppSec45 of 1420Not among the top eight
HCL AppScan39 of 1421Not among the top eight
Checkmarx DAST33 of 1420Not among the top eight
Checkmarx One26 of 1421Not among the top eight
Astra Security25 of 1424Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Invicti. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 137 of the 142 answers that named Invicti and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

getastra.com80
invicti.comYour site78
aikido.dev68
beaglesecurity.com68
augmentcode.com65
stackhawk.com64
aimultiple.com53
checkmarx.com50
escape.tech46
appsecsanta.com44

538 of the 616 domain citations in answers naming Invicti came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

invicti.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Invicti takes 20% of first choices and OWASP ZAP takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “dast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “dast tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
90,500 a month (“invicti”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
83 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 54,568 a month
Searches its site ranks for
4,998 · 315 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,709
Paid Google search
1 searches its ads show for, about 3 clicks and $50 a month (estimate)
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 109 text, 8 image, 3 video · 24 shown in the last 30 days

First shown December 2022, as Invicti Security Corp, verified. Ads started 2025-10 to 2026-09: 88 in the year, 32 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
20%
rank 2 of 58 in DAST
Segment leader
29%
OWASP ZAP
First choices
45 across its categories
Named in
142 answers
Its own site cited
in 137 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on invicti.com
27,800
subdomains included
Content
1,789
counted in the table below
Documentation
986
Product · Integration
63 · 0
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-10 to 2026-09LatestCategories named
Blog1,006undatedSAST, WAF
Webinar or virtual event204undatedSAST
News or press170undatedSAST, SCA
Report or ebook126undated
Glossary or explainer90undatedSCA, SAST
Comparison54undatedSAST, SCA
Case study39undated
Conference or event36undated
Podcast or video35undated
Template or tool29undated
How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page invicti.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name SAST (19); 0 name its categories the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.

Names read as Invicti

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Invicti; a claim can dispute any of them.
Invicti (formerly Netsparker) 8Invicti (Netsparker) 3Acunetix / Invicti 1Invicti / Acunetix by Invicti 1Invicti Enterprise 1Invicti Premium (formerly Acunetix) 1Invicti/Acunetix 1

Follow Invicti

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

Invicti is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Web Application and API Security for Enterprise
For
Enterprise
Price stated
reports in under 24 hours for $500 or less invicti.com
Starting price
500 invicti.com
Free plan or trial
proof-of-concept licenses invicti.com/pricing
Integrations claimed
110 invicti.com
Hosting
USEUCA
Customers named
Channel 4ING Insurance EURAsia IT Audit TeamPark 'N Fly, Inc.SECWATCHOECDUnify (now Mitel)ISACAOpenCart
Not stated on the pages read
Certifications

What Invicti's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: invicti.com, invicti.com/pricing, trust.invicti.com, invicti.com/platform-overview, invicti.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Invicti's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Invicti, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Invicti by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where Invicti is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name Invicti, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at invicti.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.

Badges

Wins only: a badge exists where Invicti is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHide

Invicti is among the products AI models recommend first in Dynamic application security testing this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.

Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Among AI models' top three in Dynamic application security testing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/dynamic-application-security-testing/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/invicti--dynamic-application-security-testing-wide.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Dynamic application security testing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="320" height="104"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Dynamic application security testing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Among AI models' top three in Dynamic application security testing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/dynamic-application-security-testing/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/invicti--dynamic-application-security-testing-square.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Dynamic application security testing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="240" height="240"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Dynamic application security testing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Among AI models' top three in Dynamic application security testing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index
Show the code
<a href="https://it-ai-index.com/developer/dynamic-application-security-testing/"><img src="https://it-ai-index.com/badges/2026-10/invicti--dynamic-application-security-testing-compact.svg" alt="Among AI models' top three in Dynamic application security testing, October 2026 Edition, IT AI Recommendation Index" width="200" height="56"></a>

Copy the code as it is. The link is part of the badge: it points at the Dynamic application security testing standing, where the claim can be checked.

Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.