AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Products › HCL AppScan · October 2026 Edition
1 category · Ranked

HCL AppScan

55Judge labels
2First choices
18Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
4% in DAST for enterprise buyers
Rank 47 of 58 in the mid-market standing
0 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 44% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In dast · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named HCL AppScan for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
Dynamic application security testingDeveloper platform0%47 of 5844%9under 10 labels · led by OWASP ZAP at 29%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for HCL AppScan yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment and per category, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated HCL AppScan across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501001
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00011
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.2001001
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash01012
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00011
Kimi K200112
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.500000
GPT-6 Luna00000
Muse Glimmer 30B00101

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct7 labelsNone
Paraphrase6 labelsNone
Comparative12 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels2
Scale-constrained5 labelsNone
Negative18 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative55 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 2 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“HCL AppScan is designed to help smaller businesses automate security testing without complex configurations.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · DAST · paraphrase prompt · alternative
“Best-in-class FP rate (2% in benchmarks) | User experience can be dated” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAST · scale prompt · alternative
“Leaders like ... HCL AppScan... score higher on accuracy” Grok 4.20 · DAST · negative prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“teams that cannot afford enterprise-grade commercial tools like Burp Suite Professional, HCL AppScan, or Rapid7” Qwen 3.7 Flash · DAST · budget prompt · soft negative
“Older architecture, struggles with SPAs/APIs, high false positive rates, complex configuration” Kimi K2 · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“older configurations of Fortify WebInspect, HCL AppScan, or Qualys WAS ... tread carefully” Gemini 3.5 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative
“Be cautious with: HCL AppScan (slow + costly, but lowest FPs if you can afford the wait)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · DAST · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as HCL AppScan, over the 55 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and HCL AppScan was named but was not.
ShowHide
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Invicti39 of 5519Not among the top eight
Rapid7 InsightAppSec26 of 550Not among the top eight
OWASP ZAP23 of 557Not among the top eight
Veracode DAST22 of 552Not among the top eight
Burp Suite22 of 551Not among the top eight
StackHawk21 of 553Not among the top eight
Acunetix21 of 551Not among the top eight
Checkmarx One18 of 552Not among the top eight
Checkmarx DAST18 of 550Not among the top eight
Qualys WAS16 of 550Not among the top eight
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named HCL AppScan. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 54 of the 55 answers that named HCL AppScan and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

augmentcode.com39
getastra.com38
checkmarx.com31
aikido.dev30
appsecsanta.com30
invicti.com29
beaglesecurity.com25
stackhawk.com24
cyberpress.org21
escape.tech20

287 of the 287 domain citations in answers naming HCL AppScan came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Search and answers

hcl-software.com is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, HCL AppScan takes 0% of first choices and OWASP ZAP takes 29%.
ShowHide

In search

Google, US estimates
Position for “dast tool”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “dast tools”
–
not in the top ten
Searches for its name, Google
260 a month (“hcl appscan”)
AI search demand for its name, est.
13 a month
Organic visits to its site
about 49,667 a month
Searches its site ranks for
13,770 · 431 in the top three
Sites linking to it
5,529
Paid Google search
No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
Ads on GoogleDetailLess
120+ ads · 88 text, 23 image, 9 video · 38 shown in the last 30 days

First shown August 2024, as HCL Technologies Ltd, verified. Ads started 2025-11 to 2026-10: 95 in the year, 25 before.

On Google's pages: 1 2 3 4

In answers

This edition
Share of first choices
0%
rank 47 of 58 in DAST
Segment leader
29%
OWASP ZAP
First choices
2 across its categories
Named in
55 answers
Its own site cited
in 54 of the answers that named it

Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read October 5, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.

What it publishes

ShowHide
Addresses on hcl-software.com
12,905
subdomains included
Content
2,233
counted in the table below
Documentation
10,000
Product · Integration
77 · 6
KindPagesLast 90 days2025-11 to 2026-10LatestCategories named
Blog1,870472026-09-29ITSM, DAST
News or press16612026-09-01ASPM, UEM
Report or ebook5412026-09-15DAST
Conference or event4502026-06-08SAST, SCA
Case study2512026-08-26ETL
Comparison2342026-09-10ITSM, ITAM
Glossary or explainer1842026-09-16ITSM, DEX
Webinar or virtual event1702025-10-10
Template or tool1412026-07-07
Podcast or video102023-08-02

Events in person

Last twelve months

As the event pages on hcl-software.com state them, read October 5, 2026.

How it is countedHide how it is counted

Every page hcl-software.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. Of its titles that name a category, most name ITSM (30); 15 name the category the models place it in. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read October 5, 2026.

Names read as HCL AppScan

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as HCL AppScan; a claim can dispute any of them.
HCL AppScan (Standard/Enterprise) 1HCL AppScan / IBM AppScan 1

Follow HCL AppScan

An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.

Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.

The company

HCL AppScan is its own company.
ShowHide

In its own words

Stated by the vendor, not checked
Positioning
Scans for application vulnerabilities.
For
Security & IT Compliance
Free plan or trial
Start a free trial hcl-software.com/legal/compliance
Certifications
Leader — Application Security Testing2026 Customers’ Choice — Application Security Testing
Customers named
IpsenEdison SPAPenn Veterinary SupplyAugusta Sportswear
Not stated on the pages read
Price, starting price, integrations, hosting

What HCL AppScan's own pages state, read October 5, 2026: hcl-software.com, hcl-software.com/dx/pricing, hcl-software.com/legal/compliance, hcl-software.com/dx/capabilities, hcl-software.com/cx/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when HCL AppScan's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as HCL AppScan, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives

A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for HCL AppScan by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:

  • where HCL AppScan is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
  • the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
  • its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
  • who was chosen in the answers that did not name HCL AppScan, and every reason the record gives;
  • a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
  • one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
The subscriber app

A verification link goes to your work email; an address at hcl-software.com is approved on the spot, any other is reviewed by hand. Your email is never published. Claiming gives no say over labels, shares, verdicts or which quotes appear.