IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Tyk · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

Tyk

249Judge labels
23First choices
16Negative labels
12 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
13% in API management for mid-market buyers
Rank 2 of 55 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
3 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 7% of its 41 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
In api management · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Tyk for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
API managementDeveloper platform13%2 of 557%41accepted challenger
API gatewaysDeveloper platform10%3 of 514%50accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Tyk yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Tyk across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.501304
GPT-5.4 mini22307
Gemini 3.5 Flash271111
Perplexity Sonar03104
Grok 4.1 Fast082111
Mistral Small02204
DeepSeek V4 Flash32319
Llama 4 Maverick02305
Qwen 3.7 Flash15309
Kimi K2171110
GLM 4.7 FlashX24219
MiniMax M2.503508

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct40 labels7
Paraphrase25 labels3
Comparative64 labels4not counted in share
Budget-constrained48 labels11
Scale-constrained34 labels2
Negative38 labels4not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative249 labels in all, every segment counted; 23 of the 31 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Tyk or Kong are the strongest choices due to their balance of enterprise features, competitive pricing, and flexible deployment options” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API management · direct prompt · first choice
“If you need a customer-facing developer portal + API management (the most common B2B scenario) and want flexibility: Tyk (great value)” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API gateways · direct prompt · first choice
“If you are a startup with a technical team: Choose Tyk. You will save money long-term by self-hosting” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API management · budget prompt · first choice
“Kong (specifically Kong Konnect) and Tyk are widely considered the top contenders” Qwen 3.7 Flash · API gateways · direct prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Had a major leadership change, pricing restructuring, and some stability issues” GLM 4.7 FlashX · API management · negative prompt · hard negative
“Free trials, then usage-based (~$25+/mo)—avoid if truly limited budget.” Grok 4.1 Fast · API gateways · budget prompt · hard negative
“the management console/dashboard UI isn't in the OSS edition; you'll likely need the paid version” DeepSeek V4 Flash · API management · budget prompt · soft negative
“self-hosting these gateways will lead to high operational overhead” Gemini 3.5 Flash · API gateways · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Tyk, over the 245 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Tyk was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Amazon API Gateway221 of 24516Not in the top three
Apigee165 of 24518Not in the top three
Azure API Management131 of 2454Not in the top three
Zuplo109 of 24552Compare →
MuleSoft Anypoint Platform100 of 2450Not in the top three
Apache APISIX48 of 2458Not in the top three
Postman40 of 2458Not in the top three
Traefik38 of 2451Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Tyk. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 184 of the 245 answers that named Tyk and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

zuplo.com131
moesif.com76
api7.ai71
toolradar.com68
geekflare.com65
reddit.com64
digitalapi.ai60
dupple.com60
tyk.ioYour site60
g2.com56

651 of the 711 domain citations in answers naming Tyk came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Tyk

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Tyk; a claim can dispute any of them.
Kong Konnect/Tyk Cloud 1Tyk (Community) 1Tyk (OSS Edition) 1Tyk (OSS) 1Tyk Gateway (OSS) 1Tyk OSS Gateway 1Tyk Open Source 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Tyk's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Tyk, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at tyk.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.