Customer identity and access management for small business buyers
Asked as “customer identity platform”, and as “CIAM solution for a product's users”, on behalf of a small B2B company. 63 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
30%
Contested · Frontegg 19%
30Clerk19Frontegg13Auth038others
30% of first choices, contested.
Since September 2026▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Clerk held the lead, +5 points on 27%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Clerk30%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-market
Frontegg21%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 22% → 20%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Auth047%Clear leader▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Clerk30%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageMid-marketFrontegg21%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 22% → 20%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseAuth047%Clear leader▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a small B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Clerk30%4%57endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 32%
Clerk30%4%57endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.27% → 32%02Frontegg19%0%33accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 18%
Frontegg19%0%33accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 18%03Auth013%49%74criticized challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 25% → 14%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 14%
Auth013%49%74criticized challenger▼−11Since September 2026: 25% → 14%, −11 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.25% → 14%04
WorkOS10%3%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 10% → 11%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 11%
WorkOS10%3%33accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 10% → 11%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.10% → 11%05
Descope6%0%24accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%
Descope6%0%24accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 2% → 7%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 7%06
FusionAuth5%4%23accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%
FusionAuth5%4%23accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 0% → 5%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 5%07
Supabase Auth5%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Supabase Auth5%0%20accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Amazon Cognito5%34%41criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%
Amazon Cognito5%34%41criticized challenger▲+1Since September 2026: 4% → 5%, +1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 5%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
14
Okta0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Okta0%83%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%13
Ping Identity0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Ping Identity0%80%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Keycloak0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Keycloak0%19%16accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%12
LoginRadius0%19%16accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
LoginRadius0%19%16accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%10
Firebase Authentication Lab in the set0%16%31accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Firebase Authentication Lab in the set0%16%31accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%09
Stytch0%3%32accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Stytch0%3%32accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Firebase Authentication is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Frontegg vs DescopeFrontegg vs FusionAuthFrontegg vs WorkOSFrontegg vs Microsoft Entra External IDAuth0 vs ClerkAuth0 vs LoginRadiusAuth0 vs DescopeAuth0 vs FusionAuthAuth0 vs WorkOSAuth0 vs Microsoft Entra External IDClerk vs LoginRadiusClerk vs DescopeClerk vs FusionAuthClerk vs WorkOSClerk vs Microsoft Entra External IDLoginRadius vs DescopeLoginRadius vs FusionAuthLoginRadius vs WorkOSLoginRadius vs Microsoft Entra External IDDescope vs FusionAuthDescope vs WorkOSDescope vs Microsoft Entra External IDFusionAuth vs WorkOSFusionAuth vs Microsoft Entra External IDWorkOS vs Microsoft Entra External ID
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011121314Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative50%
Key
01Clerk30%
Clerk30%02Frontegg19%
Frontegg19%03Auth013%
Auth013%04WorkOS10%
WorkOS10%05Descope6%
Descope6%06FusionAuth5%
FusionAuth5%07Supabase Auth5%
Supabase Auth5%08Amazon Cognito5%
Amazon Cognito5%09Stytch0%
Stytch0%10Firebase Authentication0%
Firebase Authentication0%11Keycloak0%
Keycloak0%12LoginRadius0%
LoginRadius0%13Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%14Okta0%
Okta0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Auth049%
36 of 74 labels negative · 14 of 14 models · 9 hard negative
“Enterprise Tier CIAM Suites (Okta Customer Identity Cloud, Ping Identity + ForgeRock, IBM Verify)... Platforms to Avoid or Approach with Extreme Caution” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Amazon Cognito34%
14 of 41 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“If your application isn't deeply embedded in AWS (Lambda, API Gateway, S3, etc.), don't use it.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
ForgeRock100%
9 of 9 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 8 hard negative
“"ForgeRock can be a significant investment, potentially making it less accessible for smaller businesses or startups with limited budgets."” Muse Glimmer 30B, negative prompt
Okta83%
10 of 12 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“small businesses should be cautious about or avoid the following types... Enterprise-focused CIAM platforms such as Okta (for customer use cases)” Llama 4 Maverick, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
75 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1097 links across 187 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
vendor site · LoginRadius29 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
vendor site · G228 answers · 51 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
28 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
27 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Clerk26 answers · 53 citations · 11 models
26 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
vendor site · MojoAuth23 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
23 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Descope21 answers · 27 citations · 10 models
21 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
vendor site · WorkOS20 answers · 29 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
26 answers · 9 models
26 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 10 models
23 answers · 11 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
20 answers · 10 models
16 answers · 8 models
16 answers · 9 models
15 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer identity platform”, “customer identity platform”, “customer identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clerk clerk.com | 30% | 94 | 110,000 | 59,082 | 46,225 | 12 | ||
| Frontegg frontegg.com | 19% | 97 | 720 | 4 | 19,060 | 10 | ||
| Auth0 auth0.com | 13% | 237 | 18,100 | 772 | 170,673 | 117 | ||
| WorkOS workos.com | 10% | 99 | 12,100 | 107 | 33,478 | 75 | ||
| Descope descope.com | 6% | 64 | 2,400 | 79 | 19,633 | $192 | 19 | |
| FusionAuth fusionauth.io | 5% | 50 | 1,300 | 21 | 44,199 | 16 | ||
| Supabase Auth supabase.com | 5% | 24 | 1,900 | 62 | 91,424 | 4 | ||
| Amazon parent site Amazon Cognito 5% | 5% | 91 | 151,000,000 | 1,380,939 | ||||
| Kinde kinde.com | 3% | 18 | 3,600 | 2,404,339 | 20,218 | 4 | 8 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra External ID 2% | 2% | 93 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (loginradius.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best customer identity platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best customer identity platform for a small B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CIAM solution for a product's users would you recommend to a small business that sells to other businesses?”Comparative“What are the top customer identity platforms for a small team and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer identity platform for a small company with a tight budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 30 person company evaluating a customer identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer identity platforms should a small business avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5ClerkFronteggChangedAuth0Auth0, Descopeno first choiceagainst: Auth0, CyberArk Customer Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, LoginRadius, Ping Identity
Three alternatives
Descope, PropelAuth, WorkOSThree alternatives
Descope, Stytch, WorkOSFour alternatives
Descope, Frontegg, JumpCloud, StytchTwo alternatives
LoginRadius, miniOrangeGPT-5.4 miniWorkOSagainst: Auth0Microsoft Entra External IDChangedClerkagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, Firebase AuthenticationClerk, FusionAuthagainst: Auth0no first choiceagainst: Auth0, Clerk, Stytch, WorkOS
Three alternatives
Clerk, Descope, StytchOne alternative
Auth0Four alternatives
Descope, FusionAuth, Stytch, WorkOSGemini 3.5 FlashFronteggagainst: Auth0KindeChangedagainst: Auth0Clerk, Kindeagainst: Auth0Kindeagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0Clerk, WorkOSagainst: Auth0against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, IBM Verify, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID, Oracle Identity Cloud, Ping Identity
Four alternatives
Clerk, Kinde, PropelAuth, WorkOSThree alternatives
Clerk, Frontegg, WorkOSTwo alternatives
Supabase Auth, WorkOSThree alternatives
Clerk, Supabase Auth, WorkOSTwo alternatives
Kinde, StytchPerplexity SonarClerk, WorkOSagainst: Auth0FronteggChangedClerkagainst: FusionAuth, KeycloakAmazon Cognitoagainst: Auth0no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra External ID, Okta
Two alternatives
Frontegg, StytchTwo alternatives
Clerk, WorkOSFour alternatives
Auth0, Descope, LoginRadius, StytchOne alternative
KeycloakGrok 4.1 FastClerk, WorkOSagainst: Amazon CognitoFronteggChangedagainst: Auth0Clerkagainst: Auth0Clerkno first choiceagainst: Auth0, ForgeRock, Okta
Four alternatives
Auth0, Descope, FusionAuth, StytchThree alternatives
Clerk, FusionAuth, WorkOSThree alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Firebase Authentication, StytchSix alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, FusionAuth, Stytch, SuperTokensMistral SmallClerk, FronteggAuth0, ClerkChangedClerk, MojoAuthagainst: Auth0Amazon Cognitoagainst: Auth0no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Amperity, Auth0, ForgeRock, LiveRamp, Okta, Tealium, mParticle
One alternative
StrivacityTwo alternatives
Keycloak, OktaThree alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, StytchOne alternative
FronteggDeepSeek V4 FlashFusionAuthagainst: Auth0Clerk, FronteggChangedagainst: Auth0Auth0, Clerkagainst: Amazon CognitoAuth0, FusionAuthagainst: KeycloakClerkagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authenticationagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, ForgeRock, IBM Verify, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity, SailPoint
Three alternatives
Descope, Frontegg, WorkOSFour alternatives
Descope, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Supabase AuthThree alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Firebase Authentication, Supabase AuthTwo alternatives
Stytch, WorkOSLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceFronteggChangedno first choiceAmazon Cognitono first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, Okta
Three alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Microsoft Entra External IDTwo alternatives
Frontegg, LoginRadiusQwen 3.7 FlashClerk, Fronteggagainst: Auth0Auth0ChangedClerkClerkagainst: Auth0Auth0, Clerkagainst: Ping Identity, SiteMindernothing named
One alternative
WorkOSTwo alternatives
Amazon Cognito, SuperTokensFour alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, LoginRadiusTwo alternatives
Google Firebase Authentication, SuperTokensTwo alternatives
Firebase Authentication, Supabase AuthKimi K2Clerk, WorkOSFronteggChangedagainst: Auth0Clerkagainst: Auth0Supabase Authagainst: Auth0Clerk, Descopeagainst: Okta, Ping Identity, Salesforce Customer 360 / Headless 360 Platform
Two alternatives
Auth0, StytchTwo alternatives
Clerk, FusionAuthTwo alternatives
Stytch, Supabase AuthThree alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Clerk, KeycloakSix alternatives
Auth0, Firebase Authentication, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Keycloak, WorkOSGLM 4.7 FlashXWorkOSFronteggChangedagainst: ForgeRock, Okta, Ping IdentityClerk, StytchAuth0Auth0, Descopeagainst: Auth0, LiveRamp, LoginRadius, Okta, Ping Identity
Four alternatives
Auth0, Clerk, Frontegg, SSOJetTwo alternatives
Auth0, miniOrangeSix alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, LoginRadius, Supabase Auth, WorkOSThree alternatives
Descope, Firebase Authentication, KeycloakOne alternative
LoginRadiusMiniMax M2.5ClerkClerkHeldagainst: Amazon Cognito, Firebase AuthenticationAuth0, ClerkAuth0, Clerk, Descopeno first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, Okta
Three alternatives
Auth0, Frontegg, WorkOSThree alternatives
Frontegg, Stytch, WorkOSTwo alternatives
Amazon Cognito, FusionAuthSix alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Firebase Authentication, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Keycloak, WorkOSGPT-6 LunaClerkStytch B2BChangedClerkSupabase Authno first choiceagainst: A custom, homegrown login system, Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Clerk, Firebase Authentication
Three alternatives
Auth0, Stytch, WorkOSOne alternative
WorkOSFive alternatives
Auth0, Firebase Authentication, Stytch, Supabase Auth, WorkOS AuthKitThree alternatives
Auth0, Clerk, Firebase AuthenticationMuse Glimmer 30BFronteggFronteggHeldClerkSupabase AuthJumpCloudagainst: Okta, Ping Identityagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, IBM Verify, LoginRadius, Okta, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Salesforce Customer Identity
Seven alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Clerk, Descope, FusionAuth, Keycloak, Stytch, WorkOSSix alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Clerk, Descope, Firebase Authentication, Stytch, WorkOSSix alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Firebase Authentication, Google Identity Platform, Supabase Auth, SuperTokensFour alternatives
Auth0, Clerk, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External IDTwo alternatives
Auth0, OneLoginBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:03 | yes | 18 | 33 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 27 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 22 | 42 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 10 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 15 | 18 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:37 | yes | 24 | 222 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 10 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:15 | yes | 12 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 15 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:06 | yes | 9 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 21 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:49 | no | 0 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:32 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:29 | no | 0 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:53 | yes | 24 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:09 | yes | 24 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 10 | 44 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:58 | yes | 2 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:51 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 17 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:34 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:52 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 15 | 10 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:25 | yes | 24 | 45 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 15 | 87 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 24 | 37 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 19 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:19 | yes | 6 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 14 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:04 | yes | 9 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:14 | yes | 18 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 23 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:28 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 25 | 38 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:59 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:39 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:51 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 10 | 27 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 4 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:00 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:19 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 9 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 31 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:13 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 13:00 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:36 | yes | 17 | 37 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:43 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:00 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 07:52 | yes | 20 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:08 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:31 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 4 | 18 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:15 | yes | 14 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:10 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:59 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 22 | 25 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:59 | yes | 25 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 25 | 37 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:55 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:25 | yes | 25 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:46 | yes | 25 | 63 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 19 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:23 | yes | 4 | 16 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:02 | yes | 24 | 31 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Firebase read as Firebase Authentication
Ping read as Ping Identity
Supabase read as Supabase Auth
Unresolved, counted raw
A custom, homegrown login system
Amperity
Google Firebase Authentication
Oracle Identity Cloud
Salesforce Customer 360 / Headless 360 Platform
SiteMinder
Stytch B2B
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.