Every category where a model named Frontegg for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	17%	3 of 74	0%	32	accepted challenger

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Frontegg yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Frontegg across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	2	1	1	4
GPT-5.4 mini	0	0	0	0
Gemini 3.5 Flash	1	4	0	5
Perplexity Sonar	0	2	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	1	1	1	3
Mistral Small	0	1	2	3
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	3	0	3
Llama 4 Maverick	1	0	0	1
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	2	0	2
Kimi K2	2	1	1	4
GLM 4.7 FlashX	1	2	0	3
MiniMax M2.5	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct23 labels11

Paraphrase20 labels6

Comparative16 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained4 labelsNone

Scale-constrained5 labelsNone

Negative3 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative71 labels in all, every segment counted; 17 of the 18 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Frontegg stands out for B2B SaaS specifically: Frontegg is the fastest path for B2B SaaS teams that need to ship enterprise-grade identity features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CIAM · direct prompt · first choice

“Frontegg is built specifically for B2B SaaS with multi-tenancy and self-service admin, ideal for teams that need production-ready CIAM” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you want to offload user interface development entirely, Frontegg is the winner.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“Start with Kinde or Frontegg if you want a modern, developer-friendly B2B CIAM” Kimi K2 · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

No model argued against it.

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Frontegg, over the 71 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Frontegg was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Auth064 of 7122Compare →

WorkOS49 of 7114Compare →

Microsoft Entra External ID36 of 710Not in the top three

Descope34 of 714Not in the top three

Stytch33 of 710Not in the top three

Ping Identity29 of 712Not in the top three

Clerk24 of 713Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito23 of 710Not in the top three

FusionAuth16 of 711Not in the top three

Keycloak13 of 710Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Frontegg. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 60 of the 71 answers that named Frontegg and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com40

startwithidentity.com40

descope.com33

loginradius.com33

securityboulevard.com32

guideflow.com26

idsync.com22

workos.com22

guptadeepak.com20

miniorange.com17

285 of the 285 domain citations in answers naming Frontegg came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-customer-identity-and-access-managem39

guideflow.com/blog/ciam-software26

descope.com/blog/post/ciam-solutions25

startwithidentity.com/articles/top-7-ciam-platforms-b2b-saas19

loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-ciam-for-small-and-medium-businesses18

miniorange.com/blog/ciam-vendors17

workos.com/blog/top-ciam-providers-in-202617

securityboulevard.com/2026/08/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-2026-in-depth-comparison16

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Frontegg's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Frontegg, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at front.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.