Small business▲+3Since September 2026: 15% → 18%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
18%from 15% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 46
2 categories · RankedFrontegg
97Judge labels
27First choices
2Negative labels
14 / 14Models named it
2Categories
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
21% in CIAM for mid-market buyers
Rank 1 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
5 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 0% of its 30 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of Frontegg →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business2 of 51
19%33 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market1 of 70
21%30 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise5 of 69
4%22 labels
accepted challenger
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Frontegg for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 21% | 1 of 70 | 0% | 30 | accepted challenger | ▲+3Since September 2026: 17% → 20%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
| Non-human identity management | Identity and access | 2% | 17 of 128 | 0% | 1 | under 10 labels · led by JumpCloud at 14% |
Movement
Since September 2026, Frontegg held within the floor in all two categories: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CIAM · by segment
Mid-market▲+3Since September 2026: 17% → 20%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
20%from 17% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 3 → 2 of 61
Enterprise▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
5%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 8 pointsRank 8 → 5 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIAM | 17% | 20% | ▲+3Since September 2026: 17% → 20%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 3 → 1 of 70 |
| NHI management | 0% | 3% | newNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 3% now. | New this edition | Rank 17 of 128, unchanged |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Frontegg across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Frontegg across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct34 labels11
Paraphrase29 labels16
Comparative17 labelsNone
Budget-constrained6 labelsNone
Scale-constrained7 labelsNone
Negative4 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative97 labels in all, every segment counted; 27 of the 28 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“If you want to minimize development time and avoid building customer-facing administrative dashboards from scratch, Frontegg is a top choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend evaluating Frontegg or Descope as starting points, as they're specifically optimized for mid-market B2B needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CIAM · direct prompt · first choice
“Frontegg and Clerk are particularly well-suited due to their B2B-focused features and ease of integration” Mistral Small · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“the best non-human identity management platform is usually Frontegg if your priority is B2B SaaS identity” Perplexity Sonar · NHI management · direct prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
No model argued against it.
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Frontegg, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Frontegg was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Frontegg, over the 97 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Frontegg was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Frontegg. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 97 of the 97 answers that named Frontegg and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
cybersecuritynews.com54
securityboulevard.com47
guideflow.com45
descope.com41
workos.com38
guptadeepak.com37
loginradius.com37
startwithidentity.com37
checkthat.ai35
expertinsights.com32
403 of the 403 domain citations in answers naming Frontegg came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
Where Frontegg stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.ShowHide
Search and answers
Where Frontegg stands in Google search beside where it stands in the models' answers.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “customer identity platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Searches for its name, Google
- 720 a month (“frontegg”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 4 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 19,060 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 5,984 · 224 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,903
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
21%
rank 1 of 70 in CIAM
First choices
27
across its categories
- Named in
- 97 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 97 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on frontegg.com
993
subdomains included
Content
550
counted in the table below
Documentation
307
Product · Integration
15 · 1
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Report or ebook | 290 | 2 | 2026-09-23 | CIAM, MFA | |
| Blog | 208 | 0 | 2025-12-12 | CIAM, MFA | |
| Comparison | 21 | 0 | 2025-09-09 | MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 19 | 0 | 2025-11-20 | IGA | |
| Case study | 5 | 0 | 2022-12-12 | ||
| Template or tool | 3 | 0 | 2026-03-08 | ||
| News or press | 3 | undated | |||
| Conference or event | 1 | 0 | 2023-02-01 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-23Gradual ciam migration report or ebook
- 2026-08-23Account hierarchy report or ebook
- 2026-03-08About tools template or tool
- 2026-03-08Managing tools template or tool
- 2025-12-12Vue authentication blog
- 2025-12-05Ai agent governance starts with guardrails blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page frontegg.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow Frontegg
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Frontegg is its own company.ShowHide
The company
Frontegg is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- The Identity Layer for Every SaaS Entry Point
- For
- B2B SaaS
- Price stated
- Pay as you go; Enterprise frontegg.com/pricing
- Starting price
- $0/month frontegg.com/pricing
- Free plan or trial
- Start for free; no credit card required frontegg.com
- Certifications
- GDPR complianceHIPAA/BAA
- Customers named
- Insight HealthToffu.AIPlume HealthOpstreamHint HealthSlope SoftwareLorisInStage
- Not stated on the pages read
- Integrations, hosting
What Frontegg's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: frontegg.com, frontegg.com/pricing, frontegg.com/trust-center/security, frontegg.com/product/ciam, frontegg.com/customers. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Frontegg's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Frontegg, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Frontegg by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Frontegg is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Frontegg, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Frontegg is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.ShowHide
Badges
Wins only: a badge exists where Frontegg is ranked in a category's top three this edition. Three sizes, one file each, light and dark; the code is under each.
ShowHideAI models recommend Frontegg first in Customer identity and access management this edition. Each badge says so in the buyer's words, names the edition, and links to the standing. The next edition issues a new badge; this one stays true as a record of October 2026.
Wide · 320 × 104 Website, beside other badges
Square · 240 × 240 LinkedIn, slides
Compact · 200 × 56 Email signature, footer
Badges read on light and dark pages. Alt text carries the claim, the category, the edition and the index, so it stays a citation where the image does not load.