Every category where a model named LoginRadius for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.

Category	Function	Share	Rank	Negative rate	Labels	Quadrant
Customer identity and access management	Identity and access	2%	10 of 74	7%	14	accepted challenger
Multi-factor authentication	Identity and access	0%	60 of 78	0%	1	under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for LoginRadius yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated LoginRadius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.

Model	First choice	Alternative	Mention	Negative	Labels
Claude Haiku 4.5	0	0	0	0	0
GPT-5.4 mini	0	1	0	0	1
Gemini 3.5 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Perplexity Sonar	0	1	1	0	2
Grok 4.1 Fast	0	1	3	0	4
Mistral Small	0	1	0	0	1
DeepSeek V4 Flash	0	0	0	0	0
Llama 4 Maverick	1	1	0	0	2
Qwen 3.7 Flash	0	1	0	0	1
Kimi K2	0	0	0	0	0
GLM 4.7 FlashX	0	0	1	1	2
MiniMax M2.5	0	1	1	0	2

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.

FramingLabels by classFirst choices

Direct4 labelsNone

Paraphrase10 labels1

Comparative15 labels1not counted in share

Budget-constrained8 labels5

Scale-constrained7 labelsNone

Negative5 labelsNone

First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative49 labels in all, every segment counted; 6 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“LoginRadius is a suitable CIAM solution for mid-sized B2B companies, offering enterprise-level security and compliance features with SMB-friendly pricing” Llama 4 Maverick · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice

“If you need a more budget-friendly option with strong security, LoginRadius is also a solid choice.” Mistral Small · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“Built for the Mid-Market: LoginRadius ... explicitly marketed toward growing businesses.” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

“LoginRadius is the strongest budget-conscious option in the results you provided” Perplexity Sonar · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Good entry point, but B2B multi‑tenant depth and SSO/SCIM are lighter” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as LoginRadius, over the 49 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LoginRadius was named but was not.

ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head

Auth038 of 4913Not in the top three

Microsoft Entra External ID24 of 492Not in the top three

Ping Identity20 of 491Not in the top three

Descope19 of 493Not in the top three

Stytch19 of 490Not in the top three

Amazon Cognito17 of 491Not in the top three

WorkOS15 of 496Not in the top three

Clerk11 of 493Not in the top three

Frontegg11 of 492Not in the top three

IBM Verify10 of 490Not in the top three

A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LoginRadius. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 49 of the 49 answers that named LoginRadius and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

loginradius.comYour site43

startwithidentity.com28

expertinsights.com24

descope.com16

securityboulevard.com15

guptadeepak.com14

guideflow.com13

worldmetrics.org13

idsync.com11

workos.com11

145 of the 188 domain citations in answers naming LoginRadius came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

loginradius.com/blog/identity/top-ciam-for-small-and-medium-businesses27

expertinsights.com/identity-and-access-management/top-customer-identity-and-access-managem24

descope.com/blog/post/ciam-solutions14

guideflow.com/blog/ciam-software13

worldmetrics.org/best/customer-identity-management-software13

startwithidentity.com/rankings/best-ciam-for-enterprises11

guptadeepak.com/top-5-enterprise-ciam-platforms-in-depth-comparison10

ibtimes.com/top-5-best-customer-identity-access-management-ciam-solutions-2026-380087810

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LoginRadius's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LoginRadius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at loginradius.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.