Small business▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 4% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 6 → 14 of 46
1 category · RankedLoginRadius
50Judge labels
8First choices
6Negative labels
12 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
12% in CIAM for mid-market buyers
Rank 4 of 70 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
4 of 14 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 5% of its 22 labels there were negative.
What the models named instead of LoginRadius →By buyer segmentStrongest at mid-market.
Small business16 of 51
0%16 labels
accepted challenger
Mid-market4 of 70
12%22 labels
accepted challenger
Enterprise10 of 69
2%10 labels
accepted challenger
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named LoginRadius for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 12% | 4 of 70 | 5% | 22 | accepted challenger | ▲+10Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. |
Movement
Since September 2026, LoginRadius held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · CIAM · by segment
Mid-market▲+10Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
12%from 2% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 1 pointRank 10 → 4 of 61
Enterprise▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
2%from 6% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 7 pointsRank 5 → 10 of 62
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIAM | 2% | 12% | ▲+10Since September 2026: 2% → 12%, +10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 10 → 4 of 70 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated LoginRadius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated LoginRadius across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Grok 4.20 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Mistral Small | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct9 labels4
Paraphrase8 labels2
Comparative15 labelsNone
Budget-constrained7 labels1
Scale-constrained5 labels1
Negative6 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative50 labels in all, every segment counted; 8 of the 8 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Prioritize platforms with strong mid-market fit like LoginRadius (simplicity) or FusionAuth (cost-effective self-hosting).” Grok 4.20 · CIAM · scale prompt · first choice
“LoginRadius is the managed-simplicity pick for mid-market teams that want CIAM without heavy engineering.” Muse Glimmer 30B · CIAM · direct prompt · first choice
“LoginRadius is frequently highlighted as the best customer identity platform for mid-market B2B companies” Mistral Small · CIAM · direct prompt · first choice
“or LoginRadius if you want a more managed, full-featured CIAM platform with predictable scaling” Perplexity Sonar · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · first choice
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Organizations give up some features and control ... there aren't many connectors for third-party fraud prevention features” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LoginRadius, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LoginRadius was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as LoginRadius, over the 50 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and LoginRadius was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named LoginRadius. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 50 of the 50 answers that named LoginRadius and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
loginradius.comYour site27
guptadeepak.com26
expertinsights.com23
guideflow.com23
cybersecuritynews.com22
g2.com19
securityboulevard.com19
checkthat.ai18
cyberpress.org17
startwithidentity.com17
184 of the 211 domain citations in answers naming LoginRadius came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
loginradius.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LoginRadius takes 12% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.ShowHide
Search and answers
loginradius.com ranks first on Google for the category's searches. In the answers, LoginRadius takes 12% of first choices and Frontegg takes 21%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “customer identity platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “customer identity platforms”
1
- Searches for its name, Google
- 170 a month (“loginradius”)
- AI search demand for its name, est.
- 7 a month
- Organic visits to its site
- about 39,709 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 10,393 · 247 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 4,565
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
12%
rank 4 of 70 in CIAM
Segment leader
21%
Frontegg
- First choices
- 8 across its categories
- Named in
- 50 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 50 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on loginradius.com
10,722
subdomains included
Content
2,172
counted in the table below
Documentation
1,098
Product · Integration
25 · 161
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 850 | 23 | 2026-09-25 | CIAM, MFA | |
| Comparison | 498 | 8 | 2026-09-28 | MFA, CIAM | |
| Report or ebook | 324 | 1 | 2026-09-24 | CIAM, MFA | |
| Glossary or explainer | 318 | 19 | 2026-09-24 | MFA, CIAM | |
| News or press | 120 | 0 | 2024-12-04 | CIAM, MFA | |
| Case study | 30 | 0 | 2026-03-23 | CIAM | |
| Template or tool | 18 | 0 | 2026-06-01 | CIAM, MFA | |
| Webinar or virtual event | 13 | 0 | 2026-03-20 | MFA, CIAM | |
| Conference or event | 1 | undated |
Most recent
- 2026-09-28Iam vs ciam comparison
- 2026-09-25Implement linkedin login blog
- 2026-09-25Ciam improve customer support blog
- 2026-09-24Ai agent delegation vs impersonation comparison
- 2026-09-24Rbac identity management ciam blog
- 2026-09-24How to implement facebook login report or ebook
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page loginradius.com exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Follow LoginRadius
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
LoginRadius is its own company.ShowHide
The company
LoginRadius is its own company.
ShowHideIn its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Secure identity and access management platform; a privacy-compliant identity and access management platform that delivers enterprise-grade authentication, authorization, and identity management for mid-market and growth-stage enterprises.
- For
- mid-market and growth-stage enterprises
- Price stated
- You don’t need Global 2000 pricing to secure millions of users. loginradius.com
- Free plan or trial
- Free Trial loginradius.com
- Integrations claimed
- 100 loginradius.com/pricing
- Certifications
- iso iec 27001 2013soc 2 type-iiiso iec 27017 2015iso iec 270182019HIPAA CompliantGDPR CompliantCSA STAR CCMGDPR
- Hosting
- 28+ data center regions
- Customers named
- A+E NetworksHealthVisionNorthumbrian Water LimitedCity of RochesterTiroler TageszeitungZachysExpress & StarHarry Rosen
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price
What LoginRadius's own pages state, read September 28, 2026: loginradius.com, loginradius.com/pricing, trust.loginradius.com, loginradius.com/platform-analytics, loginradius.com/customers/customer-stories. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when LoginRadius's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as LoginRadius, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for LoginRadius by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where LoginRadius is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name LoginRadius, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.