IT AI Index
Index Vendors › FusionAuth · September 2026 Edition
2 categories · Ranked

FusionAuth

46Judge labels
7First choices
5Negative labels
10 of 12Models named it
2Categories
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
11% in CIAM for enterprise buyers
Rank 8 of 74 in the mid-market standingaccepted challenger
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 13% of its 15 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentStrongest at enterprise.
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named FusionAuth for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer identity and access managementIdentity and access4%8 of 7413%15accepted challenger
Multi-factor authenticationIdentity and access0%54 of 780%1under 10 labels · led by Cisco Duo at 42%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for FusionAuth yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated FusionAuth across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.510001
GPT-5.4 mini02002
Gemini 3.5 Flash00000
Perplexity Sonar00213
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00101
DeepSeek V4 Flash01203
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash00000
Kimi K201102
GLM 4.7 FlashX11002
MiniMax M2.500000

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct8 labelsNone
Paraphrase7 labelsNone
Comparative9 labelsNone
Budget-constrained15 labels7
Scale-constrained4 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative46 labels in all, every segment counted; 7 of the 7 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“FusionAuth is an API-first platform designed for developers that's flexible, affordable, and packed with features.” Claude Haiku 4.5 · CIAM · budget prompt · first choice
“or FusionAuth Community Edition if you want a truly free, self-hosted solution with full control” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CIAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best free self-hosted option ... For pure cost at any scale, self-host FusionAuth” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative
“Organizations that prefer open‑source, self‑hosted control. | Requires ops expertise” GLM 4.7 FlashX · CIAM · paraphrase prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Avoid ... open-source like Keycloak/FusionAuth (high ops overhead)” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · direct prompt · hard negative
“caution if your team requires full on-prem control or strict data-residency guarantees” Perplexity Sonar · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as FusionAuth, over the 46 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and FusionAuth was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Auth035 of 4613Not in the top three
Microsoft Entra External ID24 of 460Not in the top three
WorkOS23 of 464Not in the top three
Clerk18 of 469Not in the top three
Frontegg16 of 466Not in the top three
Amazon Cognito16 of 462Not in the top three
Keycloak15 of 460Not in the top three
Ping Identity15 of 460Not in the top three
Descope13 of 461Not in the top three
Stytch12 of 460Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named FusionAuth. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 42 of the 46 answers that named FusionAuth and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

expertinsights.com27
guideflow.com27
startwithidentity.com26
loginradius.com25
securityboulevard.com22
descope.com17
workos.com17
guptadeepak.com16
idsync.com12
worldmetrics.org12

201 of the 201 domain citations in answers naming FusionAuth came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as FusionAuth

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as FusionAuth; a claim can dispute any of them.
FusionAuth Community 2FusionAuth (Community Edition) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when FusionAuth's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as FusionAuth, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at fusionauth.io is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack