Multi-factor authentication
Asked as “MFA solution”, and as “multi-factor authentication tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 60 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Cisco Duo30Microsoft Entra ID13Okta Verify10others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Cisco Duo held the lead, +5 points on 43%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Cisco Duo40%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 45% → 43%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketCisco Duo47%Clear leader▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterprise
Microsoft Entra ID41%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →
Cisco Duo40%Clear leader▼−2Since September 2026: 45% → 43%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketCisco Duo47%Clear leader▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID41%Clear leader=heldSince September 2026: 40% → 40%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Cisco Duo47%6%63endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.43% → 48%
Cisco Duo47%6%63endorsed leader▲+5Since September 2026: 43% → 48%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.43% → 48%02Microsoft Entra ID30%0%46endorsed leader▼−4Since September 2026: 30% → 26%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.30% → 26%
Microsoft Entra ID30%0%46endorsed leader▼−4Since September 2026: 30% → 26%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.30% → 26%03
Okta Verify13%14%57accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 15%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 15%
Okta Verify13%14%57accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 9% → 15%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 15%04
Microsoft Authenticator2%19%21accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
Microsoft Authenticator2%19%21accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%05
OneLogin MFA2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
OneLogin MFA2%0%12accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the six products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
Google Authenticator Lab in the set0%53%32criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%
Google Authenticator Lab in the set0%53%32criticized challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 4% → 0%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 0%10
Authy0%43%14criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Authy0%43%14criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%09
Auth00%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Auth00%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
YubiKey0%0%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
YubiKey0%0%27accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
Ping Identity0%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%
Ping Identity0%0%14accepted challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 2% → 0%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 0%08
JumpCloud Protect0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
JumpCloud Protect0%0%13accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Authenticator is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models zero times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
Head to head
All ten head-to-head pages: the top five products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Cisco Duo47%
Cisco Duo47%02Microsoft Entra ID30%
Microsoft Entra ID30%03Okta Verify13%
Okta Verify13%04Microsoft Authenticator2%
Microsoft Authenticator2%05OneLogin MFA2%
OneLogin MFA2%06YubiKey0%
YubiKey0%07Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%08JumpCloud Protect0%
JumpCloud Protect0%09Auth00%
Auth00%10Authy0%
Authy0%11Google Authenticator0%
Google Authenticator0%What they warned about
Nine of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen 3.7 Flash changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Google Authenticator53%
17 of 32 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to avoid - **DIY authenticator apps** (e.g., Google Authenticator only) – no central management or revocation.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, paraphrase prompt
Authy43%
6 of 14 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Twilio Authy (SMS-heavy): Suffered breaches exposing user data/phone numbers.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Okta Verify14%
8 of 57 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“While many popular commercial MFA apps (Okta, Microsoft Auth, Duo) offer push notifications where you click "Approve," this method has evolved into a vulnerability known as MFA Fatigue” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
Cisco Duo6%
4 of 63 labels negative · 4 of 14 models
“Duo and Okta are established options, though their pricing is typically quote-based rather than simple low-cost self-serve pricing” GPT-5.4 mini, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
70 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 879 links across 203 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 15 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
36 answers · 36 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Frontegg27 answers · 27 citations · 9 models
24 answers · 27 citations · 8 models
vendor site · miniOrange24 answers · 26 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 30 citations · 11 models
vendor site · MojoAuth20 answers · 22 citations · 10 models
18 answers · 21 citations · 7 models
17 answers · 18 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Rippling16 answers · 16 citations · 7 models
vendor site · Okta14 answers · 30 citations · 10 models
14 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
36 answers · 10 models
27 answers · 9 models
19 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 7 models
17 answers · 9 models
14 answers · 7 models
13 answers · 8 models
13 answers · 6 models
13 answers · 7 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best mfa solution”, “mfa solution”, “mfa solutions”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cisco parent site Cisco Duo 47% | 47% | 198 | 165,000 | 48,352 | ||||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 30%, Microsoft Authenticator 2% | 32% | 480 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Okta Verify okta.com | 13% | 138 | 49,500 | 1,322 | 1,959,740 | 118 | ||
| Google Workspace workspace.google.com Google Workspace 2-Step Verification 3% | 3% | 17 | 368,000 | 7,422 | 40,583,075 | $2,344 | ||
| OneLogin MFA onelogin.com | 2% | 24 | 10 | 0 | 315,519 | 0 | 2 | |
| miniOrange miniorange.com | 2% | 39 | 1,300 | 18 | 48,290 | 17 | 1 | |
| Microsoft 365, Azure AD | 2% | |||||||
| YubiKey yubico.com | 0% | 64 | 49,500 | 2,536 | 97,363 | 32 | ||
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 0% | 0% | 251 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| JumpCloud Protect jumpcloud.com | 0% | 42 | 170 | 6 | 108,479 | $8,612 | 80 | 7 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 24 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (aimultiple.com, miniorange.com, rippling.com). The first result for “best mfa solution” is miniorange.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best MFA solution for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which multi-factor authentication tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top MFA solutions and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best MFA solution for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a MFA solution. What should we look at?”Negative“Which MFA solutions should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyChangedagainst: Google AuthenticatorCisco Duo, EntraGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft 365, Azure ADno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Microsoft AuthenticatorFive alternatives
Okta Verify, Ping Identity, Silverfort, Thales SafeNet Trusted Access, YubiKeyThree alternatives
Authy, Google Authenticator, Microsoft AuthenticatorGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Cisco Duo, Okta Verifyno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyOne alternative
Okta VerifyFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, YubiKeyOne alternative
Microsoft AuthenticatorGemini 3.5 FlashCisco DuoCisco DuoHeldMicrosoft Entra IDGoogle Workspace 2-Step Verification, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Authelia, Authentik, privacyIDEACisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Three alternatives
JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyFour alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, SilverfortTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, YubiKeyThree alternatives
JumpCloud Protect, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFAPerplexity SonarCisco DuoCisco DuoHeldCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Google AuthenticatorCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Google Authenticatorno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA, WorkOSFour alternatives
IBM Verify, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFA, Ping Identity MFAEight alternatives
Auth0, Descope, Fortinet FortiAuthenticator, IBM Verify, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, RSA SecurID, YubiKeyGrok 4.1 FastCisco Duoagainst: Okta VerifyCisco DuoHeldCisco DuoCisco Duoagainst: miniOrange MFAOkta Verifyagainst: Authy, Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator
Two alternatives
JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFAFour alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, YubiKeyFive alternatives
Authy, Google Authenticator, Keycloak, Microsoft Authenticator, privacyIDEAFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, Ping Identity, PingOne, YubiKeyMistral SmallCisco Duo, Okta VerifyOkta Verify, OneLogin MFAChangedMicrosoft Azure AD MFA, Okta Verifyagainst: Google AuthenticatorCisco Duono first choicenothing named
One alternative
Microsoft Entra IDOne alternative
Cisco DuoTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, LastPass MFAFour alternatives
Authy, Google Authenticator, LastPass MFA, Microsoft AuthenticatorDeepSeek V4 FlashCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta VerifyCisco DuoChangedagainst: Google AuthenticatorCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: LastPass MFA, RSA SecurIDCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify, RipplingMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Authy, Duo Push, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify Push
One alternative
JumpCloud MFAThree alternatives
JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyThree alternatives
Okta Verify, Silverfort, YubiKeyOne alternative
JumpCloud ProtectThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Okta VerifyLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceOkta VerifyChangedno first choiceminiOrangeagainst: Google Authenticatorno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Ping IdentityOne alternative
Cisco DuoQwen 3.7 FlashMicrosoft Entra IDOkta VerifyChangedagainst: Google Authenticatorno first choiceagainst: Google Workspace 2-Step VerificationCisco DuoCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Authy, Google Authenticatoragainst: Cisco Duo, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Auth, Okta Verify
Three alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta Verify, YubiKeyThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Google Identity, Microsoft Entra IDSix alternatives
Authelia, Google Authenticator, Keycloak, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, YubiKeyThree alternatives
Auth0, Ping Identity, TremoloKimi K2Cisco DuoCisco DuoHeldagainst: Okta VerifyCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Authy, Google Auth, Okta Verify
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyTwo alternatives
JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Auth0, JumpCloud Protect, Okta VerifyOne alternative
privacyIDEAGLM 4.7 FlashXCisco Duoagainst: Thales SafeNet Trusted AccessCisco DuoHeldagainst: Auth0Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyCisco Duoagainst: Google Authenticatorno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
JumpCloud MFA, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, OneLogin MFATwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifySix alternatives
Auth0, Google Authenticator, Microsoft Authenticator, OneLogin MFA, Ping Identity, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra IDMiniMax M2.5Cisco DuoCisco DuoHeldno first choiceCisco Duo, Microsoft AuthenticatorOkta Verifyagainst: Authy, Google Authenticator
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta VerifyThree alternatives
JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta VerifyFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, CyberArk MFA, Microsoft Authenticator, Okta Verify, RSA SecurIDTwo alternatives
Authy, Okta VerifyThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, JumpCloud Protect, Microsoft Entra IDGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldpasskeysMicrosoft Entra IDno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Okta VerifySeven alternatives
Cisco Duo, Microsoft Authenticator, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, Ping Identity, PingID, YubiKeyTwo alternatives
Cisco Duo, Google Workspace 2-Step VerificationMuse Glimmer 30BCisco DuoCisco DuoHeldCisco Duo, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verifyagainst: Authy, Google AuthenticatorMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Google Authenticatorno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Azure, Okta Verify
Five alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, PingOne MFA, SafeNet Trusted Access, SecureAuth ArculixThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Verify, SafeNet Trusted AccessTwo alternatives
Auth0, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
Cisco Duo, FreeIPA, JumpCloud Protect, miniOrange, privacyIDEABold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:06 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 9 | 24 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:45 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:35 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:30 | yes | 9 | 125 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:53 | yes | 7 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 4 | 13 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:05 | yes | 10 | 19 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:15 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 3 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:47 | yes | 6 | 23 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:01 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:17 | yes | 13 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 7 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:19 | yes | 22 | 33 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:13 | no | 0 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 09:27 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 13 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:53 | no | 0 | 11 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:51 | yes | 2 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:44 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 7 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:58 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 22 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 20 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:50 | yes | 8 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:01 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:41 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:20 | yes | 15 | 26 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 15 | 139 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:29 | yes | 8 | 18 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:42 | yes | 24 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:50 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 8 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:24 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:20 | yes | 13 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:48 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:50 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:27 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:34 | yes | 20 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 23 | 126 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:06 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:13 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 12 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:01 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:15 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:47 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:57 | yes | 13 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:16 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:04 | yes | 22 | 50 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:18 | no | 0 | 36 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:45 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 17 | 105 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:12 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 3 | 14 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:37 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 1 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 17 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:54 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:06 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:21 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:16 | yes | 10 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:46 | yes | 21 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 19 | 109 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 07:59 | yes | 8 | 14 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 6 | 12 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:25 | yes | 15 | 28 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Google Workspace read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
Google Workspace (Google Authenticator) read as Google Workspace 2-Step Verification
JumpCloud read as JumpCloud Protect
LastPass read as LastPass MFA
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Microsoft Entra (Azure AD) read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Verify
Okta Adaptive MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
Okta MFA read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud read as Okta Verify
Okta Workforce Identity Cloud (with Adaptive MFA) read as Okta Verify
OneLogin read as OneLogin MFA
OneLogin by One Identity read as OneLogin MFA
Thales (SafeNet) read as Thales SafeNet Trusted Access
Unresolved, counted raw
Aegis
Apple Touch ID
Auth0 MFA
Duo Push
Entra ID MFA
FIDO2 hardware security keys
FaceID
Google Auth
Google Identity
Google Titan Key
Hardware passkeys (e.g., Yubico)
LLDAP
LastPass Identity
Microsoft 365, Azure AD
Microsoft Auth
Microsoft Azure AD MFA
Nitrokey
Okta Verify Push
PingOne MFA
Rauthy
SecureAuth Arculix
Token2
TouchID
Tremolo
Yubico's YubiKeys
macOS Platform SSO
miniOrange MFA
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.