AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Identity and access › CIAM › Frontegg vs Auth0
Customer identity and access management · October 2026 Edition

Frontegg vs Auth0

Five of fourteen models named Frontegg first on the direct prompt; five named Auth0. Frontegg was named by twelve of the fourteen models and Auth0 by fourteen and Frontegg carries 30 labels and Auth0 60, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Frontegg

accepted challenger

Named in two categories this edition.

Auth0

accepted challenger

Named in eight categories this edition.

First-choice share21%18%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate0%22%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels3060A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Frontegg reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Clerk was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Frontegg vs Clerk · Frontegg vs LoginRadius · Frontegg vs Descope

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer identity and access management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FronteggFirst choices, of fourteen modelsAuth0
Direct553 against Auth0
Paraphrase711 against Auth0
Comparative061 against Auth0
Budget-constrained033 against Auth0
Scale-constrained011 against Auth0
Negative004 against Auth0
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, Frontegg and Auth0 were named in the same answer seventy-one times, of the 97 answers naming Frontegg and the 268 naming Auth0. In those answers Auth0 took the first choice twenty-two times and Frontegg eighteen.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where Frontegg and Auth0 stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
Frontegg Auth0 first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, Frontegg on the left and Auth0 on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Frontegg and Auth0 stood in it.

Both were the first choice

1 of 14 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuth0, Frontegg alternatives: Clerk, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch

Frontegg first, Auth0 an alternative

4 of 14 modelsAuth0 was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Claude Haiku 4.5Descope, Frontegg alternatives: OneWelcome Identity Platform, SSOJet, WorkOS
GPT-5.4 miniFrontegg alternatives: Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, FusionAuth, Okta
Kimi K2Clerk, Frontegg alternatives: FusionAuth, WorkOS
Muse Glimmer 30BFrontegg, LoginRadius alternatives: Auth0, Ping Identity

Auth0 first, Frontegg an alternative

4 of 14 modelsFrontegg was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.
Grok 4.1 FastAuth0 alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch, WorkOS
Qwen 3.7 FlashAuth0, Clerk alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID
GLM 4.7 FlashXAuth0 alternatives: Clerk, Descope, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID
MiniMax M2.5Auth0, Clerk alternatives: Descope, LoginRadius

Neither was the first choice, one was named

3 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkOS alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, Kinde
Perplexity SonarLoginRadius alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID
GPT-6 LunaWorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch

Neither was named

2 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Mistral SmallLoginRadius alternatives: Thales OneWelcome
Llama 4 MaverickLoginRadius alternatives: Clerk, OneWelcome Identity Platform

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
Frontegg leads by six points.
Frontegg19%#2 of 14
Auth013%#3 of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
Frontegg leads by four points.
Frontegg21%#1 of 14
Auth018%#2 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Auth0 leads at enterprise.
Auth047%#1 of 12
Frontegg4%#4 of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Frontegg

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of three in this category shown.

“If you want to minimize development time and avoid building customer-facing administrative dashboards from scratch, Frontegg is a top choice.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · paraphrase prompt · first choice
“I'd recommend evaluating Frontegg or Descope as starting points, as they're specifically optimized for mid-market B2B needs” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice
“Frontegg and Clerk are particularly well-suited due to their B2B-focused features and ease of integration” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · first choice

What the models said about Auth0

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Budget Trap to Avoid: Auth0 (Okta) ... it is not recommended for companies on a limited budget” Gemini 3.5 Flash · budget prompt · hard negative
“The Catch: It can become exceptionally expensive. Because its pricing scales heavily on Monthly Active Users (MAUs), a growing customer base can lead to a highly ballooned bill.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · comparative prompt · soft negative
“Auth0 has issued advisories about misconfigurations, account creation fraud, credential attacks, MFA bypass, and session/token hijacking.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · negative prompt · soft negative
“Frontegg (if multi-tenant org management is a priority) or Auth0 (if you want the most mature, proven platform) are the strongest overall picks” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice
“Medium (Standard Devs) | Fully Managed Cloud<br>Best balance of speed, security, and ease of use. | Auth0 (Okta), AWS Cognito, Firebase Auth” Qwen 3.7 Flash · scale prompt · first choice
“Choose Auth0 if you want to get a product to market quickly and value developer flexibility over on-prem control.” GLM 4.7 FlashX · comparative prompt · first choice
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.