AI Indexes
IT AI Index
Index › Identity and access › CIAM › FusionAuth vs Microsoft Entra External ID
Customer identity and access management · October 2026 Edition

FusionAuth vs Microsoft Entra External ID

Zero of fourteen models named FusionAuth first on the direct prompt; zero named Microsoft Entra External ID. FusionAuth was named by eleven of the fourteen models and Microsoft Entra External ID by fourteen and FusionAuth carries 22 labels and Microsoft Entra External ID 39, so the shares are not directly comparable.

FusionAuth

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

Microsoft Entra External ID

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share5%4%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.
Negative rate5%23%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.
Rank in category#6#8A position in a field of 14; printed, not drawn.
Labels2239A count; the two differ.
The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, FusionAuth reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Clerk was named alongside these two in nine of the fourteen direct answers. Frontegg vs FusionAuth · Frontegg vs Microsoft Entra External ID · Auth0 vs FusionAuth

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the customer identity and access management page.

By framing

How many of the fourteen models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.
FusionAuthFirst choices, of fourteen modelsMicrosoft Entra External ID
Direct00
Paraphrase001 against Microsoft Entra External ID
Comparative002 against Microsoft Entra External ID
Budget-constrained22
Scale-constrained101 against FusionAuth · 1 against Microsoft Entra External ID
Negative005 against Microsoft Entra External ID
Bars are first choices, 0 to 14 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to fourteen.

Across every category in the October 2026 Edition, FusionAuth and Microsoft Entra External ID were named in the same answer nineteen times, of the 52 answers naming FusionAuth and the 97 naming Microsoft Entra External ID. In those answers Microsoft Entra External ID took the first choice two times and FusionAuth one.

Every model, every framing

The eighty-four answers behind the chart above, one cell each: where FusionAuth and Microsoft Entra External ID stood in it.
ModelDirectParaphraseComparativeBudget-constrainedScale-constrainedNegative
Claude Haiku 4.5
GPT-5.4 mini
Gemini 3.5 Flash
Perplexity Sonar
Grok 4.1 Fast
Mistral Small
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Llama 4 Maverick
Qwen 3.7 Flash
Kimi K2
GLM 4.7 FlashX
MiniMax M2.5
GPT-6 Luna
Muse Glimmer 30B
FusionAuth Microsoft Entra External ID first choice named as an alternative argued againstblank: not namedEach cell is one answer, FusionAuth on the left and Microsoft Entra External ID on the right.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where FusionAuth and Microsoft Entra External ID stood in it.

Neither was the first choice, one was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer put something else first and named one of the two as an alternative.
GPT-5.4 miniFrontegg alternatives: Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, FusionAuth, Okta
Perplexity SonarLoginRadius alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID
Grok 4.1 FastAuth0 alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch, WorkOS
DeepSeek V4 FlashAuth0, Frontegg alternatives: Clerk, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch
Kimi K2Clerk, Frontegg alternatives: FusionAuth, WorkOS
GLM 4.7 FlashXAuth0 alternatives: Clerk, Descope, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID
GPT-6 LunaWorkOS AuthKit alternatives: Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch

Neither was named

7 of 14 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.
Claude Haiku 4.5Descope, Frontegg alternatives: OneWelcome Identity Platform, SSOJet, WorkOS
Gemini 3.5 FlashWorkOS alternatives: Clerk, Frontegg, Kinde
Mistral SmallLoginRadius alternatives: Thales OneWelcome
Llama 4 MaverickLoginRadius alternatives: Clerk, OneWelcome Identity Platform
Qwen 3.7 FlashAuth0, Clerk alternatives: Microsoft Entra ID
MiniMax M2.5Auth0, Clerk alternatives: Descope, LoginRadius
Muse Glimmer 30BFrontegg, LoginRadius alternatives: Auth0, Ping Identity

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.
Small business
FusionAuth leads by three points.
FusionAuth5%#6 of 14
Microsoft Entra External ID2%#– of 14
The full small business standing →
Mid-marketThe figures above
FusionAuth leads by two points.
FusionAuth5%#6 of 14
Microsoft Entra External ID4%#8 of 14
The full mid-market standing →
Enterprise
The order flips: Microsoft Entra External ID leads at enterprise.
Microsoft Entra External ID10%#2 of 12
FusionAuth6%#– of 12
The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about FusionAuth

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Four of five in this category shown.

“Lower ongoing costs but requires more ops” Kimi K2 · scale prompt · soft negative
“Prioritize platforms with strong mid-market fit like LoginRadius (simplicity) or FusionAuth (cost-effective self-hosting).” Grok 4.1 Fast · scale prompt · first choice
“Lowest total cost (no per‑MAU fees): Keycloak or FusionAuth (self‑hosted).” GLM 4.7 FlashX · budget prompt · first choice
“Best overall for tight budgets: FusionAuth” GPT-5.4 mini · budget prompt · first choice

What the models said about Microsoft Entra External ID

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Six of eight in this category shown.

“Azure AD B2C if you need a broad, flexible CIAM platform... limited to single-app external use cases... limited customization” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · hard negative
“Microsoft stopped selling it to new customers on May 1, 2025... Microsoft calls it a legacy solution.” GPT-6 Luna · negative prompt · hard negative
“Don't start a new project on Azure AD B2C — you'd be investing in a dead-end platform.” DeepSeek V4 Flash · negative prompt · hard negative
“Need a quick, managed CIAM with a generous free allowance and Microsoft stack: Microsoft Entra External ID – free first 50,000 MAU.” Muse Glimmer 30B · budget prompt · first choice
“the best overall fit is usually Microsoft Entra External ID ... free tier for the first 50,000 monthly active users” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice
“If your company is already invested in the Microsoft ecosystem, Microsoft Entra External ID is also a strong contender.” Mistral Small · paraphrase prompt · alternative
Also compared

Comparisons are drawn for the top eight products in each category, each against each. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.