Workforce identity and SSO
Asked as “workforce identity platform”, and as “single sign-on and identity provider for employees”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 56 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
46%
Clear leader
46Microsoft Entra ID23Okta Workforce Identity20OneLogin11others
46% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Microsoft Entra ID held the lead, +6 points on 36%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
JumpCloud48%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Microsoft Entra ID46%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID49%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →
JumpCloud48%Clear leader▼−1Since September 2026: 48% → 47%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketMicrosoft Entra ID46%Clear leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageEnterpriseMicrosoft Entra ID49%Clear leader↗new leaderNew leader since September 2026: Microsoft Entra ID (47%) replaces Okta Workforce Identity (53% then, 45% now), 2 points clear, inside the 11-point floor.Standing →The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Entra ID46%9%67endorsed leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.36% → 42%
Microsoft Entra ID46%9%67endorsed leader▲+6Since September 2026: 36% → 42%, +6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.36% → 42%02
Okta Workforce Identity23%32%72criticized challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 32% → 26%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 26%
Okta Workforce Identity23%32%72criticized challenger▼−6Since September 2026: 32% → 26%, −6 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.32% → 26%03
OneLogin20%12%41accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 20%
OneLogin20%12%41accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 15% → 20%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.15% → 20%04JumpCloud9%7%44accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 10%
JumpCloud9%7%44accepted challenger▼−1Since September 2026: 11% → 10%, −1 point. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.11% → 10%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
05
Ping Identity0%23%35accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Ping Identity0%23%35accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%08
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%21%14accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%06
CyberArk Identity0%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
CyberArk Identity0%6%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%07
IBM Verify0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
IBM Verify0%0%12accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All six head-to-head pages: the top four products, each against each
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Microsoft Entra ID46%
Microsoft Entra ID46%02Okta Workforce Identity23%
Okta Workforce Identity23%03OneLogin20%
OneLogin20%04JumpCloud9%
JumpCloud9%05Ping Identity0%
Ping Identity0%06CyberArk Identity0%
CyberArk Identity0%07IBM Verify0%
IBM Verify0%08ForgeRock Identity Platform0%
ForgeRock Identity Platform0%What they warned about
Two of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Okta Workforce Identity32%
23 of 72 labels negative · 13 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Okta is not recommended unless you have a SaaS portfolio of 50+ applications” Llama 4 Maverick, budget prompt
Microsoft Entra ID9%
6 of 67 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“Avoid if not deeply in the Microsoft ecosystem (e.g., no heavy M365/Azure use)—integration friction elsewhere.” Grok 4.1 Fast, negative prompt
Ping Identity23%
8 of 35 labels negative · 6 of 14 models
“You should be extremely cautious about organizations heavily reliant on these platforms due to their recent merger” Mistral Small, negative prompt
OneLogin12%
5 of 41 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“This is currently the highest-risk scenario for enterprises... your costs may skyrocket; if you are looking to buy, the long-term roadmap is opaque.” Qwen 3.7 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1074 links across 253 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 51 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
50 answers · 89 citations · 12 models
33 answers · 45 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Corma28 answers · 42 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Okta25 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Siit23 answers · 34 citations · 12 models
22 answers · 26 citations · 10 models
vendor site · JumpCloud16 answers · 21 citations · 8 models
vendor site · SSOJet16 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 9 models
16 answers · 17 citations · 8 models
15 answers · 15 citations · 8 models
vendor site · Microsoft14 answers · 23 citations · 7 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 11 models
19 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 9 models
18 answers · 8 models
18 answers · 10 models
13 answers · 8 models
12 answers · 10 models
11 answers · 7 models
11 answers · 10 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platform”, “workforce identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra ID 46% | 46% | 480 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Okta Workforce Identity okta.com | 23% | 213 | 390 | 8 | 1,959,740 | 118 | 2 | |
| OneLogin onelogin.com | 20% | 119 | 60,500 | 562 | 315,519 | 0 | ||
| JumpCloud jumpcloud.com | 9% | 321 | 12,100 | 244 | 108,479 | $8,612 | 80 | |
| Google Cloud google.dev Google Cloud Identity 2% | 2% | 42 | 165,000 | 7,596 | 881,346 | 109 | ||
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 0%, ForgeRock Identity Platform 0%, Ping Workforce360 0% | 0% | 251 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | |
| CyberArk cyberark.com CyberArk Identity 0% | 0% | 51 | 22,200 | 1,253 | 147,793 company | $62 | 0 | |
| IBM parent site IBM Verify 0% | 0% | 79 | 201,000 | 34,098 | ||||
| Rippling rippling.com | 0% | 37 | 301,000 | 17,886 | 712,399 | $42,013 | 115 | |
| Auth0 auth0.com Auth0 0%, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud 0% | 0% | 237 | 18,100 | 772 | 170,673 | 117 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 23 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (forrester.com, okta.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best workforce identity platform” is thectoclub.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best workforce identity platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which single sign-on and identity provider for employees would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top workforce identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best workforce identity platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a workforce identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which workforce identity platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Okta Workforce IdentityOneLoginChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce Identity
Three alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLogin, tenfoldTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLogin, miniOrangeGPT-5.4 miniOkta Workforce Identityagainst: SaviyntMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: BeyondTrustMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identityno first choicenothing named
Three alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
Cisco Duo, Ping Identity, PingOneTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Hideez Workforce Identity ServiceGemini 3.5 FlashMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Keycloak, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, LastPass, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
One alternative
JumpCloudTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
Authentik, JumpCloud, OneLogin, RipplingThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, RipplingPerplexity SonarOkta Workforce IdentityOneLoginChangedno first choiceOneLoginno first choiceagainst: CyberArk Identity, Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, WorkOSThree alternatives
Entrust Workforce Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityGrok 4.1 FastOkta Workforce Identityagainst: Ping IdentityOkta Workforce IdentityHeldagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Keycloak, Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginThree alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginTwo alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginSix alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity, RipplingMistral SmallOneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedagainst: JumpCloudOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: ForgeRock Identity Platform, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
OneLogin, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
CyberArk Identity, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityDeepSeek V4 FlashJumpCloudMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identityagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, Ping Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginLlama 4 MaverickOkta Workforce Identity, OneLoginOneLoginChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Entra ID, OneLoginagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: IBM ISAM, Okta Workforce Identity, Oracle Identity Governance, SailPoint IdentityIQ, Saviynt
Two alternatives
Descope, OLOIDQwen 3.7 FlashOkta Workforce Identity, OneLoginOkta Workforce IdentityChangedOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, OneLoginno first choiceagainst: Auth0, Centrify, ForgeRock Identity Platform, NetIQ, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Two alternatives
JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginSix alternatives
ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLogin, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Ping IdentityKimi K2JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDChangedagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityGoogle Cloud Identity, Microsoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity / ForgeRock
Two alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, OneLoginTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, OneLoginThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Ping IdentityOne alternative
JumpCloudTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityGLM 4.7 FlashXOkta Workforce Identityagainst: Ping IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDChangedMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityJumpCloudno first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginFour alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity, OneLogin, WorkOSEight alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, OneLogin, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Auth0, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra IDMiniMax M2.5JumpCloud, OneLoginMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityChangedOkta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityThree alternatives
CyberArk Identity, Google Cloud Identity, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityGPT-6 LunaMicrosoft Entra IDMicrosoft Entra IDHeldno first choiceMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
JumpCloud, Okta Workforce IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Workforce Identity, P2Seven alternatives
Google Cloud Identity, IBM Verify, JumpCloud, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity, PingOne for WorkforceOne alternative
JumpCloudMuse Glimmer 30BOneLoginMicrosoft Entra IDChangedagainst: Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityMicrosoft Entra IDagainst: Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: JumpCloud, Okta Workforce Identity
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce IdentityOne alternative
OneLoginFour alternatives
CyberArk Identity, ForgeRock Identity Platform, IBM Verify, Ping Workforce360Two alternatives
JumpCloud, SSOJetBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:09 | yes | 18 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:45 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:58 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:09 | yes | 24 | 28 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:03 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:50 | yes | 10 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 16 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:49 | yes | 24 | 75 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:13 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 4 | 14 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:37 | yes | 23 | 30 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 19 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:42 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:56 | yes | 12 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 17 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:39 | yes | 23 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 07:27 | yes | 9 | 6 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:31 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 07:53 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:28 | yes | 14 | 107 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:27 | yes | 5 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:54 | yes | 1 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:28 | yes | 11 | 15 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:58 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 4 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:40 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:38 | yes | 28 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 09:23 | yes | 22 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 15 | 11 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 22 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:00 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 14 | 53 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 19 | 21 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:40 | yes | 7 | 20 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:52 | yes | 23 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:30 | yes | 9 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:39 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:21 | yes | 14 | 23 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:55 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:08 | yes | 25 | 20 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:34 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:52 | yes | 16 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:03 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:41 | yes | 25 | 54 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:24 | yes | 19 | 29 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 14 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:41 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 08:45 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:05 | no | 0 | 16 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:17 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 20 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:47 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:57 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 5 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:04 | yes | 15 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:34 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:16 | yes | 14 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 12:58 | yes | 2 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:07 | no | 0 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:18 | yes | 4 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:27 | yes | 21 | 32 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 22 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 07:56 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:44 | yes | 25 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:59 | no | 0 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:59 | yes | 24 | 35 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:10 | yes | 24 | 150 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:01 | yes | 14 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 4 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 25 | 43 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
CyberArk read as CyberArk Identity
ForgeRock read as ForgeRock Identity Platform
Google Workspace read as Google Cloud Identity
Google Workspace (Google Identity) read as Google Cloud Identity
Google Workspace Identity read as Google Cloud Identity
Microsoft Entra read as Microsoft Entra ID
Okta read as Okta Workforce Identity
Okta (Workforce Identity Cloud) read as Okta Workforce Identity
Ping read as Ping Identity
SailPoint read as SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Unresolved, counted raw
Entrust Workforce Identity
Hideez Workforce Identity Service
NetIQ
OLOID
P2
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.