| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Customer identity and access management | Identity and access | 2% | 12 of 74 | 33% | 9 | under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22% |
| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.1 Fast | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
“Building an MVP / Prototype | Firebase Auth (Cheapest/Easiest)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CIAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Google/mobile-first apps ... Cons: Limited passkeys/advanced CIAM” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Mobile/Google Ecosystem: Firebase Authentication” Kimi K2 · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative
“(Best for Google Ecosystem) - Free tier: 50,000 MAUs” MiniMax M2.5 · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“Unlike Firebase, which charges "per operation" (meaning a spike in read/write operations can trigger a surprise bill)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cautiously use it only for basic consumer MVPs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Firebase/Cognito criticized for vendor lock-in.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 32 answers that named Firebase Authentication and are not a share of its labels.
Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Firebase Authentication came from somebody else's page.
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firebase Authentication's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firebase Authentication, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firebase.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.
Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.