IT AI Index
Index Vendors › Firebase Authentication · September 2026 Edition
Firebase · 1 category · Ranked

Firebase Authentication

32Judge labels
2First choices
11Negative labels
11 of 12Models named it
1Category
September 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table vv2026-09.2, every buyer segment counted.
Best standing
2% in CIAM for small business buyers
Rank 12 of 74 in the mid-market standing
0 of 12 models made it the first choice on the direct prompt; 33% of its 9 labels there were negative.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
In ciam · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading

Standing by category

Every category where a model named Firebase Authentication for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
CategoryFunctionShareRankNegative rateLabelsQuadrant
Customer identity and access managementIdentity and access2%12 of 7433%9under 10 labels · led by Auth0 at 22%

Movement

This is the first edition on this tier, so no move can be computed for Firebase Authentication yet. From the next edition this section shows, per buyer segment, whether its share moved by more than the measured noise floor.

By model

How each model treated Firebase Authentication across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Twelve models, six prompts per category.
ModelFirst choiceAlternativeMentionNegativeLabels
Claude Haiku 4.500101
GPT-5.4 mini00000
Gemini 3.5 Flash00123
Perplexity Sonar00000
Grok 4.1 Fast01012
Mistral Small00000
DeepSeek V4 Flash00000
Llama 4 Maverick00000
Qwen 3.7 Flash10001
Kimi K201001
GLM 4.7 FlashX00000
MiniMax M2.501001

By framing

Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 labelNone
Paraphrase5 labelsNone
Comparative5 labelsNone
Budget-constrained9 labels2
Scale-constrained3 labelsNone
Negative9 labels1not counted in share
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative32 labels in all, every segment counted; 2 of the 3 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.

What the models said for it

Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.

“Building an MVP / Prototype | Firebase Auth (Cheapest/Easiest)” Qwen 3.7 Flash · CIAM · budget prompt · first choice
“Best for Google/mobile-first apps ... Cons: Limited passkeys/advanced CIAM” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative
“Best for Mobile/Google Ecosystem: Firebase Authentication” Kimi K2 · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative
“(Best for Google Ecosystem) - Free tier: 50,000 MAUs” MiniMax M2.5 · CIAM · budget prompt · alternative

And against it

Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.

“Unlike Firebase, which charges "per operation" (meaning a spike in read/write operations can trigger a surprise bill)” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · budget prompt · soft negative
“Cautiously use it only for basic consumer MVPs.” Gemini 3.5 Flash · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative
“Firebase/Cognito criticized for vendor lock-in.” Grok 4.1 Fast · CIAM · negative prompt · soft negative

Named alongside

The products named in the same answers as Firebase Authentication, over the 32 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Firebase Authentication was named but was not.
ProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
Auth029 of 324Not in the top three
Clerk21 of 3210Not in the top three
Amazon Cognito18 of 321Not in the top three
Keycloak17 of 320Not in the top three
WorkOS15 of 322Not in the top three
Stytch14 of 320Not in the top three
Microsoft Entra External ID13 of 320Not in the top three
Supabase Auth12 of 322Not in the top three
Descope11 of 323Not in the top three
Ping Identity9 of 321Not in the top three
A head-to-head page exists where both products are in a category's top three. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.

What carried it into the answer

The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Firebase Authentication. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.

Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, four of the twelve in this edition, so these counts come from 18 of the 32 answers that named Firebase Authentication and are not a share of its labels.

Domains cited

loginradius.com16
descope.com12
expertinsights.com12
startwithidentity.com11
guideflow.com8
worldmetrics.org8
ibtimes.com7
clerk.com6
securityboulevard.com6
g2.com5

Ninety-one of the ninety-one domain citations in answers naming Firebase Authentication came from somebody else's page.

Pages cited

Pages are listed as the models cited them.

Names read as Firebase Authentication

What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Firebase Authentication; a claim can dispute any of them.
Firebase 3Firebase Authentication (Google) 1
Is this your product?

Claim this page

Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Firebase Authentication's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Firebase Authentication, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.

It does not get any change to labels, shares or verdicts, any preview, or any say over which quotes appear. A verification link goes to your work email; an address at firebase.com is approved on the spot, any other address is reviewed by hand.

Your name and company appear on the claimed page, or the company alone if you ask below. A title and a LinkedIn address appear there too if you give them, and are left off if you do not. Your email address is never published.

Subscribe to the pack