Customer identity and access management for enterprise buyers
Asked as “customer identity platform”, and as “CIAM solution for a product's users”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
47%
Clear leader
47Auth010Microsoft Entra External ID06FusionAuth37others
47% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Auth0 held the lead, −5 points on 47%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Clerk30%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-market
Frontegg21%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 22% → 20%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Auth047%Clear leader▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Clerk30%Contested▲+5Since September 2026: 27% → 32%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketFrontegg21%Contested▼−2Since September 2026: 22% → 20%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseAuth047%Clear leader▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Auth047%15%73endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 42%
Auth047%15%73endorsed leader▼−5Since September 2026: 47% → 42%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.47% → 42%02
Microsoft Entra External ID10%12%51accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 12%
Microsoft Entra External ID10%12%51accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 9% → 12%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.9% → 12%03
Ping Identity6%14%49accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%
Ping Identity6%14%49accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 4% → 7%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.4% → 7%04Frontegg4%9%22accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
Frontegg4%9%22accepted challenger▲+3Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +3 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%05
WorkOS4%9%23accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 13% → 5%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 5%
WorkOS4%9%23accepted challenger▼−8Since September 2026: 13% → 5%, −8 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.13% → 5%06
LoginRadius2%20%10accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%
LoginRadius2%20%10accepted challenger▼−4Since September 2026: 6% → 2%, −4 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.6% → 2%07
Amazon Cognito2%43%23criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Amazon Cognito2%43%23criticized challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%08
Okta2%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%
Okta2%40%10criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 2% → 2%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 2%Show the four products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
12
ForgeRock0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ForgeRock0%50%18criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%11
Stytch0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
Stytch0%33%12criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
WSO2 Identity Server0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
WSO2 Identity Server0%9%11accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%09
IBM Verify0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
IBM Verify0%0%18accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Frontegg vs DescopeFrontegg vs FusionAuthFrontegg vs WorkOSFrontegg vs Microsoft Entra External IDAuth0 vs ClerkAuth0 vs LoginRadiusAuth0 vs DescopeAuth0 vs FusionAuthAuth0 vs WorkOSAuth0 vs Microsoft Entra External IDClerk vs LoginRadiusClerk vs DescopeClerk vs FusionAuthClerk vs WorkOSClerk vs Microsoft Entra External IDLoginRadius vs DescopeLoginRadius vs FusionAuthLoginRadius vs WorkOSLoginRadius vs Microsoft Entra External IDDescope vs FusionAuthDescope vs WorkOSDescope vs Microsoft Entra External IDFusionAuth vs WorkOSFusionAuth vs Microsoft Entra External IDWorkOS vs Microsoft Entra External ID
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
010203040506070809101112Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Auth047%
Auth047%02Microsoft Entra External ID10%
Microsoft Entra External ID10%03Ping Identity6%
Ping Identity6%04Frontegg4%
Frontegg4%05WorkOS4%
WorkOS4%06LoginRadius2%
LoginRadius2%07Amazon Cognito2%
Amazon Cognito2%08Okta2%
Okta2%09IBM Verify0%
IBM Verify0%10WSO2 Identity Server0%
WSO2 Identity Server0%11Stytch0%
Stytch0%12ForgeRock0%
ForgeRock0%What they warned about
Four of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5 and GPT-6 Luna changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Auth015%
11 of 73 labels negative · 10 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Why Avoid the Giants (Okta, Auth0, Ping) for This Specific Goal?” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
ForgeRock50%
9 of 18 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“adopting the legacy ForgeRock stack means inheriting a sunsetting product” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
Amazon Cognito43%
10 of 23 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to Avoid - AWS Cognito at scale — while cheap initially, costs become unpredictable with growth” Kimi K2, budget prompt
Ping Identity14%
7 of 49 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Why Avoid the Giants (Okta, Auth0, Ping) for This Specific Goal?” Qwen 3.7 Flash, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
76 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1101 links across 212 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 13 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
45 answers · 88 citations · 12 models
vendor site · Guideflow43 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
42 answers · 69 citations · 12 models
36 answers · 49 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Descope30 answers · 34 citations · 10 models
vendor site · WorkOS28 answers · 38 citations · 9 models
vendor site · LoginRadius26 answers · 35 citations · 12 models
25 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
25 answers · 25 citations · 11 models
23 answers · 24 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Ping Identity19 answers · 21 citations · 12 models
vendor site · SSOJet17 answers · 34 citations · 9 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
43 answers · 10 models
29 answers · 10 models
28 answers · 9 models
25 answers · 11 models
22 answers · 10 models
22 answers · 8 models
21 answers · 10 models
19 answers · 8 models
19 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 11 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best customer identity platform”, “customer identity platform”, “customer identity platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Auth0 auth0.com Auth0 47%, Auth0 CIAM with Organizations 2%, Auth0 B2B Connect 0% | 49% | 237 | 18,100 | 772 | 170,673 | 117 | ||
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Entra External ID 10%, Microsoft Entra ID 4% | 14% | 480 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Ping pingidentity.com Ping Identity 6%, Ping Identity / ForgeRock 4% | 10% | 251 | 12,100 | 249 | 73,959 company | $30 | 55 | 5 |
| FusionAuth fusionauth.io | 6% | 50 | 1,300 | 21 | 44,199 | 16 | ||
| Frontegg frontegg.com | 4% | 97 | 720 | 4 | 19,060 | 10 | ||
| WorkOS workos.com | 4% | 99 | 12,100 | 107 | 33,478 | 75 | ||
| SSOJet ssojet.com | 4% | 30 | 40 | 0 | 9,629 | |||
| LoginRadius loginradius.com | 2% | 50 | 170 | 7 | 39,709 | 3 | 1 | |
| Amazon parent site Amazon Cognito 2% | 2% | 91 | 151,000,000 | 1,380,939 | ||||
| Hideez hideez.com | 2% | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 25 sites; 3 of them are among the sites the models cited here (loginradius.com, pingidentity.com, startwithidentity.com). The first result for “best customer identity platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best customer identity platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which CIAM solution for a product's users would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade customer identity platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best customer identity platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a customer identity platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which customer identity platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5no first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceHideezagainst: Auth0, Okta Workforce Identityno first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0/Okta Customer Identity Cloud, ForgeRock, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
One alternative
Curity Identity ServerGPT-5.4 miniAuth0Microsoft Entra External IDChangedagainst: Microsoft Entra External ID, Salesforce IdentityAuth0, Ping Identityagainst: Amazon CognitoMicrosoft Entra External IDagainst: ForgeRockno first choicenothing named
One alternative
Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Okta Auth0 / Customer Identity Cloud, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
ForgeRock, Frontegg, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID, SAP Customer Identity and Access Management / Customer Data CloudOne alternative
Auth0Gemini 3.5 FlashFronteggAuth0, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External IDChangedAuth0against: Amazon CognitoFusionAuthagainst: Auth0/Okta Customer Identity CloudAuth0against: Akamai Identity Cloud, Amazon Cognito, Clerk, ForgeRock, Google Firebase, Kinde, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Salesforce Customer 360 Identity, Stytch
Four alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOSOne alternative
WorkOSThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Transmit SecurityThree alternatives
Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID, WorkOSThree alternatives
Descope, Ping Identity, WorkOSPerplexity SonarWorkOSPing IdentityChangedAuth0LoginRadiusagainst: ForgeRockno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Entra External ID, Simon Data, Tealium, Twilio Segment, mParticle
Three alternatives
Auth0, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External IDTwo alternatives
Frontegg, WorkOSSeven alternatives
Amazon Cognito, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Salesforce Platform Identity, WSO2 Identity ServerOne alternative
IBM VerifyGrok 4.1 FastAuth0against: Frontegg, LoginRadiusAuth0HeldAuth0Amazon CognitoAuth0against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Descope, ForgeRock, LoginRadius, OneLogin, Salesforce CIAM, WSO2 Identity Server
Three alternatives
Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, Transmit SecurityFour alternatives
Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, PingOne, WorkOSThree alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
Auth0, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Stytch, WorkOSSeven alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Clerk, LoginRadius, Ping Identity, SSOJet, Stytch, WorkOSMistral SmallAuth0Auth0, Microsoft Entra IDChangedAuth0Auth0no first choiceagainst: Auth0, ForgeRock, Okta, Ping Identity
Four alternatives
IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity ServerOne alternative
Ping IdentityNine alternatives
CyberArk Customer Identity, ForgeRock, Frontegg, Google Cloud Identity, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra ID, Ping Identity, Stytch, WorkOSSix alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, Keycloak, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityDeepSeek V4 FlashAuth0, WorkOSagainst: OktaAuth0ChangedAuth0, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identityagainst: Amazon CognitoPing Identity / ForgeRock, SSOJetagainst: Microsoft Entra External ID, WorkOSno first choiceagainst: Auth0, ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra ID, Okta Workforce Identity, Ping Identity
Three alternatives
Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityTwo alternatives
Ping Identity, WorkOSThree alternatives
IBM Verify, LoginRadius, WSO2 Identity ServerOne alternative
Auth0Llama 4 Maverickno first choiceAuth0ChangedAuth0no first choiceagainst: Auth0, Ping IdentityAuth0nothing named
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Ping IdentityFour alternatives
Frontegg, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Transmit SecurityQwen 3.7 FlashOktaPing IdentityChangedAuth0FusionAuthagainst: Auth0, Okta, Ping Identity, SSOJetAuth0against: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, Descope, Firebase Authentication, Google Identity Services, Legacy On-Premise Solutions, Stytch
Four alternatives
Auth0, ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra ID, OneLoginTwo alternatives
Auth0, Microsoft Entra IDThree alternatives
Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity ServerOne alternative
KeycloakTwo alternatives
Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity / ForgeRockKimi K2Auth0Auth0HeldAuth0Ping Identity / ForgeRockagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0no first choiceagainst: Akamai Identity Cloud, Amazon Cognito, In-House / Homegrown CIAM, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Stytch
Four alternatives
Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WorkOSThree alternatives
Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
Amazon Cognito, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityOne alternative
Microsoft Entra External IDGLM 4.7 FlashXAuth0Microsoft Entra External IDChangedAuth0Microsoft Entra IDno first choiceagainst: Auth0, Firebase Authentication, ForgeRock, Okta, Ping Identity, Supabase Auth
Four alternatives
Frontegg, Ping Identity, SSOJet, WorkOSFive alternatives
Auth0, ForgeRock, Frontegg, Keycloak, Ping IdentityFive alternatives
Amazon Cognito, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity ServerTwo alternatives
Auth0, Ping IdentityMiniMax M2.5Auth0Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityChangedAuth0MojoAuth, SSOJetagainst: Auth0/Okta, WorkOSno first choicenothing named
One alternative
LoginRadiusOne alternative
LoginRadiusFour alternatives
ForgeRock, LoginRadius, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityFour alternatives
ForgeRock, FusionAuth, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityGPT-6 LunaAuth0Auth0 CIAM with OrganizationsChangedno first choiceAuth0no first choiceagainst: Amazon Cognito, Auth0, ForgeRock, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity
Three alternatives
Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping IdentityThree alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0 B2B Connect, Microsoft Entra External IDSeven alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Auth0, IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, SAP Customer Data Cloud, Transmit SecurityOne alternative
Microsoft Entra External IDMuse Glimmer 30BAuth0Auth0HeldAuth0Auth0, FusionAuthagainst: Auth0no first choiceagainst: Akamai Identity Cloud, Stytch
Two alternatives
Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity incl. ForgeRockFive alternatives
Amazon Cognito, Frontegg, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping incl. ForgeRock, WorkOSFour alternatives
IBM Verify, Microsoft Entra External ID, Ping Identity, WSO2 Identity ServerOne alternative
SSOJetBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:17 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:26 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 19 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 13:30 | yes | 23 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 22 | 31 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:19 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 19 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 07:41 | yes | 24 | 96 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 5 | 20 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 07:39 | yes | 4 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 08:54 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:37 | yes | 3 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:25 | yes | 8 | 26 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:34 | yes | 21 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 14 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:23 | no | 0 | 4 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:46 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:10 | yes | 5 | 34 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:08 | yes | 16 | 31 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 10 | 28 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:47 | yes | 15 | 56 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:48 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:55 | yes | 13 | 22 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:48 | yes | 8 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:39 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 25 | 6 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 25 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:02 | yes | 7 | 8 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 20 | 63 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:16 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:03 | yes | 10 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 08:53 | yes | 14 | 37 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 13:31 | yes | 18 | 79 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 13 | 20 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:28 | yes | 7 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 21 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:55 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:36 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 07:48 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 19 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:34 | yes | 22 | 11 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 24 | 32 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 13:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 11:41 | yes | 9 | 42 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:11 | yes | 19 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:20 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 09:41 | yes | 25 | 52 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 13:16 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:04 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 07:54 | yes | 18 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 10:06 | yes | 4 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 08:31 | yes | 13 | 32 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 29 | 5 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 25 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:32 | no | 0 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:33 | yes | 23 | 69 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:12 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:14 | yes | 15 | 34 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:27 | yes | 20 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 11:07 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:12 | no | 0 | 53 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 3 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:10 | yes | 15 | 31 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 13:13 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:19 | no | 0 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:39 | yes | 12 | 30 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:51 | yes | 23 | 3 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:01 | yes | 25 | 19 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 08:07 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:24 | yes | 23 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:53 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:15 | yes | 17 | 73 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 13:25 | yes | 24 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 08:41 | yes | 23 | 168 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:22 | yes | 21 | 49 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 5 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:06 | yes | 20 | 34 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Firebase read as Firebase Authentication
Ping read as Ping Identity
Ping Identity / PingOne for Customers read as Ping Identity
Supabase read as Supabase Auth
WSO2 read as WSO2 Identity Server
Unresolved, counted raw
Auth0 B2B Connect
Auth0 CIAM with Organizations
AuthKit
Better Auth
Cloudentity
Curity Identity Server
Google Firebase
Google Identity Services
Hideez
In-House / Homegrown CIAM
Legacy On-Premise Solutions (e.g., Old Active Directory setups)
Okta Auth0 / Customer Identity Cloud
Phase Two
Ping Identity incl. ForgeRock
Ping incl. ForgeRock
SAP Customer Identity and Access Management / Customer Data Cloud
Salesforce CIAM (Headless 360 Platform or NPSP extensions)
Salesforce Customer 360 Identity
Salesforce Identity
Salesforce Platform Identity
Skycloak
Thales OneWelcome Identity Platform
cidaas
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.