SOAR platforms for enterprise buyers
Asked as “SOAR platform”, and as “security orchestration and automated response tool”, on behalf of an enterprise B2B company. 51 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each.
Standing · first-choice share
41%
Clear leader
41Cortex XSOAR16Splunk SOAR12Tines31others
41% of first choices, clear leader.
Since September 2026▲+2Since September 2026: 40% → 42%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Cortex XSOAR held the lead, +2 points on 40%, inside the 11-point floor.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
Small business
Tines44%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 49% → 42%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketTines41%Clear leader▼−10Since September 2026: 47% → 37%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Enterprise
Cortex XSOAR41%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 40% → 42%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This page
Tines44%Clear leader▼−7Since September 2026: 49% → 42%, −7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →Mid-marketTines41%Clear leader▼−10Since September 2026: 47% → 37%, −10 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.Standing →EnterpriseCortex XSOAR41%Clear leader▲+2Since September 2026: 40% → 42%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.This pageThe standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for an enterprise B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Cortex XSOAR41%32%72criticized default▲+2Since September 2026: 40% → 42%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 42%
Cortex XSOAR41%32%72criticized default▲+2Since September 2026: 40% → 42%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.40% → 42%02
Splunk SOAR16%34%73criticized challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 19%
Splunk SOAR16%34%73criticized challenger▲+7Since September 2026: 12% → 19%, +7 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.12% → 19%03Tines12%5%38accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 12%
Tines12%5%38accepted challenger▲+5Since September 2026: 7% → 12%, +5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.7% → 12%04
Microsoft Sentinel6%9%46accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 7%
Microsoft Sentinel6%9%46accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 5% → 7%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 7%05
Swimlane Turbine6%3%38accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 19% → 5%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 5%
Swimlane Turbine6%3%38accepted challenger▼−14Since September 2026: 19% → 5%, −14 points. Past the 11-point floor: movement. Read over the models both editions asked.19% → 5%06
Torq4%4%27accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%
Torq4%4%27accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 2% → 5%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.2% → 5%07
Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set4%35%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 5%
Google Security Operations SOAR Lab in the set4%35%23criticized challenger=heldSince September 2026: 5% → 5%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 5%08
IBM QRadar SOAR2%29%41criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%
IBM QRadar SOAR2%29%41criticized challenger▼−2Since September 2026: 5% → 2%, −2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 2%09
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%20%10accepted challenger▲+2Since September 2026: 0% → 2%, +2 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 2%Show the two products at 0%, ordered by negative rate
11
ServiceNow Security Operations0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%
ServiceNow Security Operations0%10%10accepted challenger=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.0% → 0%10
D3 Security Smart SOAR0%9%11accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%
D3 Security Smart SOAR0%9%11accepted challenger▼−5Since September 2026: 5% → 0%, −5 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.5% → 0%The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Google Security Operations SOAR is made by Google, whose model Gemini 3.5 Flash is in the set. On the four share prompts that model made it the first choice zero times of 4; the other thirteen models two times of 52. Lab treatment is defined on the method page; the row is marked, not excluded.
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Tines vs Cortex XSOARTines vs Rapid7 InsightConnectTines vs Microsoft SentinelTines vs Splunk SOARShuffle vs Swimlane TurbineShuffle vs TorqShuffle vs Cortex XSOARShuffle vs Rapid7 InsightConnectShuffle vs Microsoft SentinelShuffle vs Splunk SOARSwimlane Turbine vs TorqSwimlane Turbine vs Cortex XSOARSwimlane Turbine vs Rapid7 InsightConnectSwimlane Turbine vs Microsoft SentinelSwimlane Turbine vs Splunk SOARTorq vs Cortex XSOARTorq vs Rapid7 InsightConnectTorq vs Microsoft SentinelTorq vs Splunk SOARCortex XSOAR vs Rapid7 InsightConnectCortex XSOAR vs Microsoft SentinelCortex XSOAR vs Splunk SOARRapid7 InsightConnect vs Microsoft SentinelRapid7 InsightConnect vs Splunk SOARMicrosoft Sentinel vs Splunk SOAR
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
0102030405060708091011Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative60%
Key
01Cortex XSOAR41%
Cortex XSOAR41%02Splunk SOAR16%
Splunk SOAR16%03Tines12%
Tines12%04Microsoft Sentinel6%
Microsoft Sentinel6%05Swimlane Turbine6%
Swimlane Turbine6%06Torq4%
Torq4%07Google Security Operations SOAR4%
Google Security Operations SOAR4%08IBM QRadar SOAR2%
IBM QRadar SOAR2%09Rapid7 InsightConnect2%
Rapid7 InsightConnect2%10D3 Security Smart SOAR0%
D3 Security Smart SOAR0%11ServiceNow Security Operations0%
ServiceNow Security Operations0%What they warned about
Seven of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Mistral Small, Kimi K2, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Splunk SOAR34%
25 of 73 labels negative · 12 of 14 models · 5 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Your Use Case | Splunk SOAR | Primarily per-seat licensing; adding thousands of users is extremely costly.” Muse Glimmer 30B, budget prompt
Cortex XSOAR32%
23 of 72 labels negative · 11 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“Platforms to Avoid for Predictable Costs at Scale ... ~$12,000 per user annually” Kimi K2, budget prompt
IBM QRadar SOAR29%
12 of 41 labels negative · 8 of 14 models · 6 hard negative
“**Avoid for Cloud.** ... Large enterprises planning cloud-first architectures should completely avoid signing new contracts for QRadar SOAR.” Gemini 3.5 Flash, negative prompt
Google Security Operations SOAR35%
8 of 23 labels negative · 7 of 14 models · 3 hard negative
“Verdict: Avoid unless you are already a Chronicle/SecOps customer. If you are only buying SOAR, the convergence risk is too high.” DeepSeek V4 Flash, negative prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
81 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1103 links across 209 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. 40 of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category; the method page measures whether that reading tilts an answer.
39 answers · 43 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Intezer39 answers · 40 citations · 10 models
vendor site · Strike4838 answers · 47 citations · 12 models
37 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Guideflow37 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Palo Alto Networks36 answers · 44 citations · 14 models
35 answers · 37 citations · 11 models
31 answers · 35 citations · 10 models
28 answers · 28 citations · 10 models
24 answers · 24 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 8 models
vendor site · BlinkOps21 answers · 23 citations · 11 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
39 answers · 10 models
38 answers · 10 models
37 answers · 11 models
35 answers · 11 models
32 answers · 10 models
31 answers · 11 models
31 answers · 10 models
30 answers · 11 models
28 answers · 10 models
24 answers · 9 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best soar platform”, “soar platform”, “soar platforms”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cortex cortex.io Cortex XSOAR 41%, Cortex AgentiX 2% | 43% | 169 | 390 | 14 | 16,782 | 6 | |
| Splunk splunk.com Splunk SOAR 16% | 16% | 188 | 40,500 | 6,832 | 892,906 company | 120 | 5 |
| Tines tines.com Tines 12%, Tines 3B 2% | 14% | 142 | 22,200 | 3,167 | 10,888 | 97 | |
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Sentinel 6% | 6% | 359 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | |||
| Swimlane Turbine swimlane.com | 6% | 89 | 50 | 0 | 15,132 | 37 | 6 |
| Torq torq.io | 4% | 142 | 6,600 | 1,467 | 5,966 | 6 | |
| Google Security Operations google.dev Google Security Operations SOAR 4% | 4% | 44 | 390 | 5 | 881,346 company | 109 | |
| IBM parent site IBM QRadar SOAR 2%, IBM Resilience 0% | 2% | 83 | 201,000 | 34,098 | |||
| Rapid7 parent site Rapid7 InsightConnect 2% | 2% | 48 | 14,800 | 798 | |||
| Securonix SIEM + SOAR | 2% |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 22 sites; 2 of them are among the sites the models cited here (blinkops.com, paloaltonetworks.com). The first result for “best soar platform” is reddit.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best SOAR platform for an enterprise B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which security orchestration and automated response tool would you recommend to a large B2B company with thousands of employees?”Comparative“What are the top enterprise-grade SOAR platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best SOAR platform for a large company that needs predictable total cost across thousands of users?”Scale-constrained“We are a 5,000 person company with SSO, SOC 2 and procurement review requirements evaluating a SOAR platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which SOAR platforms should a large enterprise avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Cortex XSOARSplunk SOARChangedCortex XSOARManageEngine Log360, Microsoft Sentinelagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbineno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR
Six alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqTwo alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOARFour alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TorqGPT-5.4 miniMicrosoft SentinelCortex XSOARChangedCortex XSOARSplunk SOARno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, TinesFive alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqOne alternative
Cortex XSOARGemini 3.5 FlashTines, Torqagainst: Cortex XSOARTorqChangedagainst: Cortex XSOARno first choiceTinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Shuffle, Splunk SOAR
Four alternatives
D3 Security Smart SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Prophet Security, SimbianThree alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, TinesSix alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqTwo alternatives
D3 Security Smart SOAR, Swimlane TurbinePerplexity SonarCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARIBM QRadar SOARagainst: Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Three alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Incident Response, Splunk SOARSeven alternatives
Cyware, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, ThreatConnect, TorqGrok 4.1 FastCortex XSOARagainst: IBM QRadar SOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARGoogle Security Operations SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Demisto Pre-Palo Alto, Google Security Operations SOAR, ManageEngine SOAR/Log360, Older Swimlane, Splunk SOAR
Two alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARFour alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane TurbineFour alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Incident Response, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane TurbineThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Swimlane TurbineMistral SmallCortex XSOARCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARChangedCortex XSOARagainst: Google Security Operations SOAR, Splunk SOARTinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: IBM QRadar SOAR, Intezer, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR, Tines
Three alternatives
Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqTwo alternatives
IBM Security Resilient, Microsoft SentinelFour alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Tines, TorqDeepSeek V4 FlashCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARSwimlane Turbineagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqCortex XSOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Micro Focus ArcSight SOAR, Splunk SOAR, TheHive
Four alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesTwo alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAROne alternative
D3 Security Smart SOARFive alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqLlama 4 Maverickno first choiceno first choiceHeldno first choiceno first choiceno first choiceagainst: ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR
Qwen 3.7 FlashCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARCortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARHeldno first choiceSplunk SOARagainst: Cortex XSOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Exabeam Incident Responder, ServiceNow, Splunk SOAR, Trend Micro Apex Central
Three alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, TinesTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security OperationsFive alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARTwo alternatives
Rapid7 InsightConnect, ServiceNow Security Incident ResponseKimi K2Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARCortex XSOARChangedagainst: Splunk SOARSplunk SOARSwimlane Turbine, Tinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARTinesagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR
Five alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, D3 Security Smart SOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Swimlane TurbineThree alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, TinesSeven alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, D3 Security Smart SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, ServiceNow Security Operations, Swimlane TurbineTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, TorqTwo alternatives
Swimlane Turbine, TorqGLM 4.7 FlashXCortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldCortex XSOARGoogle Security Operations SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane SOARSplunk SOARagainst: Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR
Four alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOAR, Tines, TorqThree alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, Splunk SOAR, TinesSix alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqTwo alternatives
FortiSOAR, TinesFour alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, FortiSOAR, Swimlane Turbine, TinesMiniMax M2.5Cortex XSOARCortex XSOARHeldSplunk SOARagainst: Google Security Operations SOARRapid7 InsightConnectagainst: Cortex XSOAR, D3 Security Smart SOAR, Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR
Five alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOARThree alternatives
Google Security Operations SOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Splunk SOARFive alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, TinesTwo alternatives
Swimlane Turbine, TorqGPT-6 LunaTinesCortex XSOARChangedno first choiceTines 3Bno first choiceagainst: Cisco XDR, Microsoft Sentinel
Three alternatives
Cortex XSOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAROne alternative
Swimlane TurbineMuse Glimmer 30BCortex AgentiX, Cortex XSOARCortex XSOARChangedCortex XSOARSecuronix SIEM + SOAR, Swimlane Turbineagainst: Splunk SOARno first choiceagainst: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, ManageEngine Log360, Splunk SOAR
Three alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARTwo alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOARFive alternatives
IBM QRadar SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, ServiceNow Security Operations, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane TurbineOne alternative
D3 Security Smart SOARFive alternatives
Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane Turbine, Tines, TorqBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:45 | yes | 13 | 10 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 3 | 6 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:04 | yes | 19 | 27 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 08:09 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:51 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:02 | yes | 11 | 8 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 19 | 54 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 09:19 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 09:11 | yes | 15 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:45 | yes | 15 | 23 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:57 | yes | 11 | 17 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 08:11 | yes | 5 | 19 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 09:44 | yes | 14 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:36 | yes | 9 | 7 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 12:20 | yes | 1 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 15 | 20 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 07:42 | yes | 20 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 10:20 | yes | 22 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:21 | yes | 9 | 13 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 13:25 | yes | 20 | 35 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 13:15 | yes | 9 | 36 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:50 | yes | 15 | 29 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:26 | yes | 9 | 18 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:43 | yes | 5 | 17 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:35 | yes | 3 | 12 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 12:16 | yes | 14 | 21 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 10 | 11 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:51 | yes | 4 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 09:40 | yes | 8 | 23 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:23 | yes | 20 | 7 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 08:22 | yes | 21 | 8 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 09:09 | yes | 5 | 32 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:32 | yes | 22 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 12:35 | yes | 5 | 1 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 10:54 | yes | 7 | 29 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 11:58 | yes | 20 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:05 | yes | 14 | 65 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 12:56 | yes | 13 | 33 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 10:44 | yes | 8 | 33 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 11:44 | yes | 15 | 30 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 10:49 | yes | 16 | 8 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 09:22 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 12:49 | yes | 17 | 22 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 23 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:03 | yes | 17 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 11:34 | yes | 14 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 07:43 | yes | 24 | 33 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 08:49 | yes | 5 | 9 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:15 | yes | 18 | 161 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:48 | yes | 23 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 10:39 | yes | 23 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 11:40 | yes | 21 | 57 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 09:17 | yes | 3 | 13 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 13:22 | yes | 17 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 09:12 | yes | 18 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 13:26 | yes | 2 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 13:06 | no | 0 | 17 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:25 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 11:29 | yes | 19 | 9 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 12:18 | no | 0 | 7 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 09:47 | yes | 19 | 72 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 08:00 | yes | 10 | 52 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 12:45 | yes | 24 | 38 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 09:24 | yes | 25 | 33 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:34 | yes | 15 | 42 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 11:26 | yes | 3 | 23 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 10:07 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-01 12:07 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-01 07:55 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-01 11:05 | yes | 11 | 29 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-01 13:05 | yes | 20 | 4 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-01 12:02 | yes | 23 | 10 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-01 10:08 | yes | 11 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-01 12:46 | yes | 22 | 39 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-01 10:13 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-01 12:25 | no | 0 | 33 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-01 10:24 | yes | 23 | 20 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-01 12:22 | yes | 22 | 40 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-01 10:43 | yes | 17 | 24 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-01 08:32 | yes | 2 | 17 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-01 08:59 | yes | 23 | 32 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
D3 Security read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
D3 Security (Morpheus) read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
D3 Security (Smart SOAR / Morpheus AI) read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
D3 Security (Smart SOAR / Morpheus) read as D3 Security Smart SOAR
Exabeam read as Exabeam Incident Responder
Google SecOps read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google SecOps (Chronicle) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google SecOps (formerly Chronicle/Siemplify) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Google Security Operations (Chronicle) read as Google Security Operations SOAR
Microsoft Sentinel + Logic Apps read as Microsoft Sentinel
Palo Alto Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks (Cortex XSOAR) read as Cortex XSOAR
Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR read as Cortex XSOAR
Splunk (Splunk Security Essentials/Phantom) read as Splunk SOAR
Splunk SOAR, formerly Phantom read as Splunk SOAR
Swimlane read as Swimlane Turbine
Unresolved, counted raw
DeepSeek V4 Flash
Demisto Pre-Palo Alto
Gartner Peer Insights SOAR
Guideflow SOAR
IBM Security Resilient (IBM QRadar SOAR)
ManageEngine SOAR/Log360
Micro Focus ArcSight SOAR
Older Swimlane
Palo Alto Networks SOAR
Securonix SIEM + SOAR
Swimlane SOAR
Tines 3B
Trend Micro Apex Central
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.