Index › Security operations › SOAR › Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect

SOAR platforms · September 2026 Edition

Tines vs Rapid7 InsightConnect

Ten of twelve models named Tines first on the direct prompt; four named Rapid7 InsightConnect. Tines was named by twelve of the twelve models and Rapid7 InsightConnect by eleven and Tines carries 48 labels and Rapid7 InsightConnect 25, so the shares are not directly comparable.

Tines

endorsed leader

Named in one category this edition.

Rapid7 InsightConnect

accepted challenger

Named in one category this edition.

First-choice share47%15%Of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, 0 to 100.

Negative rate0%8%Negative labels as a share of the product's labels, 0 to 100.

Rank in category#1#2A position in a field of 12; printed, not drawn.

Labels4825A count; the two differ.

The two percentage rows are drawn on one 0 to 100 track, Tines reading right to left. Rank and label count are printed, not drawn.Tines vs Shuffle · Rapid7 InsightConnect vs Shuffle

Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts over all twelve models, for a mid-market B2B company; rank is within the category; every quote names the model and the prompt it came from. Both figures come from the SOAR platforms page.

By framing

How many of the twelve models made each the first choice, per way of asking, and how many argued against it.

TinesFirst choices, of twelve modelsRapid7 InsightConnect

Direct104

Paraphrase43

Comparative10

Budget-constrained60

Scale-constrained20

Negative202 against Rapid7 InsightConnect

Bars are first choices, 0 to 12 each sideModels that argued againstA model can name both, so the two sides of a row do not sum to twelve.

The direct prompt

The plain question, one answer per model, grouped by where Tines and Rapid7 InsightConnect stood in it.

Both were the first choice

3 of 12 modelsThe answer named them together, and the judge labeled each a first choice.

Mistral SmallRapid7 InsightConnect, Tines alternatives: FortiSOAR, Swimlane

DeepSeek V4 FlashRapid7 InsightConnect, Tines alternatives: Swimlane Turbine

MiniMax M2.5Rapid7 InsightConnect, Tines alternatives: FortiSOAR, Swimlane

Tines first, Rapid7 InsightConnect an alternative

7 of 12 modelsRapid7 InsightConnect was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Gemini 3.5 FlashTines alternatives: BlinkOps, Microsoft Sentinel, Swimlane Turbine, Torq

Perplexity SonarTines alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Splunk SOAR, Swimlane

Grok 4.1 FastTines alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine, Torq

Llama 4 MaverickTines alternatives: FortiSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Splunk SOAR

Qwen 3.7 FlashTines alternatives: FortiSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect

Kimi K2Tines alternatives: Rapid7 InsightConnect

GLM 4.7 FlashXTines alternatives: FortiSOAR, Rapid7 InsightConnect, Torq

Rapid7 InsightConnect first, Tines an alternative

1 of 12 modelsTines was named in the answer but not as the choice, or not at all.

Claude Haiku 4.5Rapid7 InsightConnect, Swimlane Turbine alternatives: Cortex XSOAR, Google Security Operations SOAR, Microsoft Sentinel, Splunk SOAR, Tines, Torq

Neither was named

1 of 12 modelsThe answer made no first choice from these two in this category.

GPT-5.4 miniSwimlane Turbine alternatives: Microsoft Sentinel

Bold names in an answer are the products the judge labeled a first choice; a model naming several gives each of them that label. The full answer text for every row is in the record.

By buyer segment

The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment and they are never added together. The figures above are the mid-market standing, which is the one the category orders by.

Small business

Tines leads by forty-two points.

Tines#1 of 9

Rapid7 InsightConnect#2 of 9

The full small business standing →

Mid-marketThe figures above

Tines leads by thirty-two points.

Tines#1 of 12

Rapid7 InsightConnect#2 of 12

The full mid-market standing →

Enterprise

Tines leads by seven points.

Tines#5 of 11

Rapid7 InsightConnect#– of 11

The full enterprise standing →

What the models said about Tines

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Three of four in this category shown.

“Tines: Renowned for its incredible ease of use, robust API connectivity, and powerful no-code workflow engine. Highly popular among mid-market teams” Gemini 3.5 Flash · scale prompt · first choice

“a free/open-source option like Tines Community Edition... Community Edition is free and still provides meaningful capability” Perplexity Sonar · budget prompt · first choice

“the best SOAR platform is usually Tines if you want the strongest balance of usability, low maintenance, and no-code automation” Perplexity Sonar · direct prompt · first choice

What the models said about Rapid7 InsightConnect

Every negative label with a quote, up to three, then the highest-weighted positives, up to three. Five of six in this category shown.

“the following SOAR platforms are mentioned as having drawbacks or being less desirable: 1. Rapid7 SOAR” Llama 4 Maverick · negative prompt · hard negative

“Be cautious with Rapid7 InsightConnect / Rapid7 SOAR ... it does indicate user dissatisfaction with those products” Perplexity Sonar · negative prompt · soft negative

“offering the most affordable entry point with a 30-day free trial for mid-market teams. It's purpose-built for mid-market security teams” Claude Haiku 4.5 · direct prompt · first choice

“Rapid7 InsightConnect and Tines are top choices due to their ease of use, low-code capabilities, and strong integration options.” Mistral Small · direct prompt · first choice

“Rapid7 InsightConnect if you're already on Rapid7 and want fastest time-to-value, or Tines if you want maximum flexibility” DeepSeek V4 Flash · direct prompt · first choice

Also compared

Tines vs Shuffle Rapid7 InsightConnect vs Shuffle The full SOAR standing

Comparisons are drawn for the top three products in each category. The output is the models' output; nothing here is a recommendation by the index.