Mid-marketgoneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsNot ranked
Cortex · 1 category · Named, not rankedCortex AgentiX
5Judge labels
1First choices
2Negative labels
4 / 14Models named it
1Category
October 2026 Edition. Every number here is derived from the raw labels under vendor table v2026-10.8, every buyer segment counted.
Standing
2 labels, too few to rank
A product needs 10 labels in a category before a share or quadrant is stated. Cortex AgentiX was named 2 times in SOAR, where Tines led with 41%. The labels and the evidence are below, counted exactly.
By buyer segmentRead the same way at every buyer size.
Small businessnot named
0%
No model named it for this buyer.
Mid-market65 of 67
0%2 labels
under the label threshold
Enterprise10 of 45
2%2 labels
under the label threshold
In soar · each standing computed within its segment · bars are 0 to 100 · the accent bar is the product's own best reading
Standing by category
Every category where a model named Cortex AgentiX for a mid-market B2B company. Share is first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts; rank is within every product named in that category.
| Category | Function | Share | Rank | Negative rate | Labels | Quadrant | Since September 2026 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR platforms | Security operations | 0% | 65 of 67 | 100% | 2 | under 10 labels · led by Tines at 41% | goneNot named this edition; 0% in September 2026. |
Movement
Since September 2026, Cortex AgentiX held within the floor in its one category: no change cleared 11 points.
Best category · SOAR · by segment
Enterprise=heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked.
0%from 0% in September 2026
Inside the floor by 11 pointsRank 26 → 25 of 41
All categories · Mid-market
| Category | September 2026 | Now | Change | Reading | Rank |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SOAR | 0% | 0% | =heldSince September 2026: 0% → 0%, ±0 points. Inside the 11-point floor: within noise. Read over the models both editions asked. | Within noise | Rank 24 → 65 of 67 |
Shares here are read over the models both editions asked, so they can differ by a point or two from the standing above, which counts every model in this edition.
The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured · The editions
By model
How each model treated Cortex AgentiX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.ShowHide
By model
How each model treated Cortex AgentiX across every prompt where it was named for a mid-market B2B company. Fourteen models, six prompts per category.
ShowHide| Model | First choice | Alternative | Mention | Negative | Labels |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Claude Haiku 4.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-5.4 mini | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Gemini 3.5 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Perplexity Sonar | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Grok 4.20 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Mistral Small | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| DeepSeek V4 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Llama 4 Maverick | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Qwen 3.7 Flash | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimi K2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GLM 4.7 FlashX | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| MiniMax M2.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| GPT-6 Luna | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Muse Glimmer 30B | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
By framing
Which of the six questions produced the naming. By model says how often; this says asked what. The first-choice count on the right carries the marks of the models that produced it.
FramingLabels by classFirst choices
Direct1 label1
Paraphrase0 labelsNone
Comparative1 labelNone
Budget-constrained0 labelsNone
Scale-constrained0 labelsNone
Negative3 labelsNone
First choiceAlternativeMentionNegative5 labels in all, every segment counted; 1 of the 1 first choices count toward share, since the comparative and negative framings do not. The bar is one segment per label class, to scale within the framing.
What the models said for it
Verbatim evidence the judge attached to positive labels.
No positive label carried a quote.
And against it
Verbatim evidence attached to negative labels. A warning on a product with few labels is a warning; on a product with many, it is one voice among them.
“vendor-native successors like Cortex AgentiX or Google SecOps SOAR only if you are already committed to that ecosystem” Muse Glimmer 30B · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
“That's a reason to scrutinize a new XSOAR 8 on-prem purchase” GPT-6 Luna · SOAR · negative prompt · soft negative
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cortex AgentiX, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cortex AgentiX was named but was not.ShowHide
Named alongside
The products named in the same answers as Cortex AgentiX, over the 5 answers that named it. Took the first choice instead counts the answers where the other product was the first choice and Cortex AgentiX was named but was not.
ShowHideProductSame answerTook the first choice insteadHead to head
A head-to-head page exists where both products are among a category's top eight. The other rows are the same fact without a page behind them, so they link to the product instead.
What carried it into the answer
The sites and pages cited by the answers that named Cortex AgentiX. A fact about retrieval, not a lever on the model.
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list, five of the fourteen in this edition, so these counts come from 5 of the 5 answers that named Cortex AgentiX and are not a share of its labels.
Domains cited
d3security.com3
intezer.com3
paloaltonetworks.com3
blinkops.com2
checkthat.ai2
docs.cloud.google.com2
exaforce.com2
gartner.com2
startupstash.com2
strike48.com2
Twenty-three of the twenty-three domain citations in answers naming Cortex AgentiX came from somebody else's page.
Pages cited
Pages are listed as the models cited them.
Search and answers
cortex.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cortex AgentiX takes 0% of first choices and Tines takes 41%.ShowHide
Search and answers
cortex.io is not in Google's top ten for any of the category's searches. In the answers, Cortex AgentiX takes 0% of first choices and Tines takes 41%.
ShowHideIn search
Google, US estimatesPosition for “soar platform”
–
not in the top ten
Position for “soar platforms”
–
not in the top ten
- Organic visits to its site
- about 16,782 a month
- Searches its site ranks for
- 1,883 · 116 in the top three
- Sites linking to it
- 1,758
- Paid Google search
- No ads found in the estimate; that does not mean it runs none
In answers
This editionShare of first choices
0%
rank 65 of 67 in SOAR
Segment leader
41%
Tines
- First choices
- 1 across its categories
- Named in
- 5 answers
- Its own site cited
- in 5 of the answers that named it
Search figures are US estimates from DataForSEO, read September 28, 2026; AI search demand is its modeled, directional estimate, not a count of queries to any assistant. The answers are this edition's. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
What it publishes
ShowHide
What it publishes
ShowHideAddresses on cortex.io
781
subdomains included
Content
483
counted in the table below
Documentation
243
Product · Integration
23 · 0
| Kind | Pages | Last 90 days | 2025-10 to 2026-09 | Latest | Categories named |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Blog | 324 | 7 | 2026-08-11 | IaC, Patching | |
| Report or ebook | 66 | 0 | 2026-06-16 | ||
| Glossary or explainer | 32 | 1 | 2026-09-03 | ||
| Podcast or video | 24 | 6 | 2026-09-10 | ||
| Comparison | 16 | 1 | 2026-08-18 | ||
| Case study | 15 | 2 | 2026-08-05 | ||
| Webinar or virtual event | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-27 | ||
| Conference or event | 2 | 0 | 2025-06-18 | ||
| Template or tool | 2 | 0 | 2026-01-14 |
Most recent
- 2026-09-10Judgment is the job planera s naveen puvvula on keeping the human at the front of the pdlc podcast or video
- 2026-09-03What is an internal developer portal glossary or explainer
- 2026-08-27Attacker expertise just got commoditized semgrep s adam berman on security in the agent era podcast or video
- 2026-08-18Drive vs dx core 4 comparison
- 2026-08-13Garbage in garbage out splunk s steve flanders on why ai can t fix your bad telemetry podcast or video
- 2026-08-11Drive and space blog
How it is countedHide how it is counted
Every page cortex.io exposes, subdomains included. Kind is read from the address and title. The last 90 days, the latest date and the twelve months count pages by when they were published, from the site's feeds, a date in the address, or the page's own publication date, read from up to a hundred of its most recently changed pages; a page that says only when it last changed is counted in its kind but not in when, so the recent counts are a floor, and a kind none of whose pages gives a publication date reads undated. An event counts as online when its address or title says so (webinar, on demand, virtual or online summit); a conference, summit, trade show, expo or roadshow that does not say so is counted as a conference or event, which on a vendor's site is mostly in person. Read September 29, 2026.
Names read as Cortex AgentiX
What the judge wrote, as written, with how often. The vendor table decides that these count as Cortex AgentiX; a claim can dispute any of them.
Cortex XSOAR / Cortex AgentiX 1
Follow Cortex AgentiX
An email the morning each edition publishes: where this product moved, where it held, and by how much against the noise floor. One address, confirmed by a click; a stop link in every email.
Already following? Everything you follow, with a stop for each.
The company
Cortex is the company behind Cortex AgentiX.ShowHide
The company
Cortex is the company behind Cortex AgentiX.
ShowHideOn record
Company records- Also from Cortex
- Cortex XSOAR
In its own words
Stated by the vendor, not checked- Positioning
- Cortex is the Engineering Operations Platform that helps organizations continuously improve their operational maturity and reduce developer friction – so that the whole organization operates as one.
- For
- engineering org
- Price stated
- Cortex uses a per-seat model with pricing that scales based on org size. Pricing is customized. Contact the team for a quote. cortex.io/pricing
- Integrations claimed
- 50 cortex.io/pricing
- Certifications
- SOC Type 2 CertifiedISO/IEC 27001:2022 Certified
- Customers named
- H&R BlockSkyscannerXeroArcherRapid7MONY GroupVistaPrintOutreach
- Not stated on the pages read
- Starting price, free plan or trial, hosting
What Cortex AgentiX's own pages state, read October 6, 2026: cortex.io, cortex.io/pricing, trust.cortex.io, cortex.io/solutions/agents, cortex.io/case-studies. A claimed page can correct any of them.
Is this your product?
Claim this page
Claiming is free and changes nothing in the data. A claimed page shows a verified contact who is told when each edition publishes and when Cortex AgentiX's standing changes by more than the noise floor; the right to propose corrections to the vendor table, meaning names the judge wrote that should or should not read as Cortex AgentiX, applied by version and listed in the change log; and a one-line description supplied by the vendor and marked as such.
What a new claim receivesHide what a new claim receives
A new claim receives the current edition's vendor brief for Cortex AgentiX by email, built from the raw record of the edition. It shows:
- where Cortex AgentiX is named, by buyer and by framing, and which cells hold its first choices;
- the claims the models make when they name it, ranked, with the strongest and the weakest quoted;
- its vocabulary against the segment leader's, and the pages the models cited;
- who was chosen in the answers that did not name Cortex AgentiX, and every reason the record gives;
- a battlecard for each top rival: the head-to-head split, why they win, and the reservation quoted against them;
- one page of published figures cleared to show a buyer.