OT and IoT security
Asked as “OT security platform”, and as “industrial and IoT device security tool”, on behalf of a mid-market B2B company. 48 first choices recorded across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, fourteen models each. Added to the October 2026 Edition on October 4, 2026; its answers are read by the distilled judge (ai-indexes-judge-qwen3-14b-run3), not the claude-opus-5 judge of the earlier categories: how the two compare.
Standing · first-choice share
21%
Contested · Claroty xDome 19%
21Microsoft Defender for IoT19Claroty xDome10Nozomi Networks Guardian50others
21% of first choices, contested.
By buyer segment
The same question asked on behalf of a different buyer. Each standing is computed within its segment; they sit side by side and are never added together.
The standing
Share is the count of first choices across the direct, paraphrase, budget and scale prompts, over all fourteen models, for a mid-market B2B company. Ordered by share.
ProductFirst-choice shareNegative rateLabelsQuadrantSince September 2026
01Microsoft Defender for IoT21%21%42accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 21% now.
03
Nozomi Networks Guardian10%13%46accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 10% now.
Nozomi Networks Guardian10%13%46accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 10% now.04
Fortinet OT Security Platform8%4%23accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now.
Fortinet OT Security Platform8%4%23accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 8% now.06
Tenable OT Security4%15%27accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.
Tenable OT Security4%15%27accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 4% now.Show the one product at 0%, ordered by negative rate
09
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%20%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%20%15accepted challengernewNew since September 2026: not ranked then, 0% now.The floor is 11 points of share, measured: how far the models move a leader on their own when the same questions are asked twice with nothing changed. A larger change is movement; a smaller one is noise, and both are shown. Movement is read over the twelve models both editions asked; GPT-6 Luna, Muse Glimmer 30B joined this edition and are in the standing but not yet in the comparison. How the floor is measured
Bars are the share of first choices, 0 to 100Every product with at least 10 labels here. Every product name links to its product page.
Head to head
All twenty-eight head-to-head pages: the top eight products, each against each
Microsoft Defender for IoT vs Armis CentrixMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Tenable OT SecurityMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoT vs Palo Alto NetworksClaroty xDome vs Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformClaroty xDome vs Armis CentrixClaroty xDome vs Tenable OT SecurityClaroty xDome vs Dragos PlatformClaroty xDome vs Palo Alto NetworksNozomi Networks Guardian vs Fortinet OT Security PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Armis CentrixNozomi Networks Guardian vs Tenable OT SecurityNozomi Networks Guardian vs Dragos PlatformNozomi Networks Guardian vs Palo Alto NetworksFortinet OT Security Platform vs Armis CentrixFortinet OT Security Platform vs Tenable OT SecurityFortinet OT Security Platform vs Dragos PlatformFortinet OT Security Platform vs Palo Alto NetworksArmis Centrix vs Tenable OT SecurityArmis Centrix vs Dragos PlatformArmis Centrix vs Palo Alto NetworksTenable OT Security vs Dragos PlatformTenable OT Security vs Palo Alto NetworksDragos Platform vs Palo Alto Networks
Recommended versus criticized
Every product with at least 10 labels here, on both axes. The 30% line names a quadrant, not the verdict above: that one needs more than 40%.
Criticized challengerCriticized default
Negative label rate →
M01
020304
0506
07
0809Accepted challengerEndorsed leader
0%First-choice share → · lines at 30% share and 25% negative40%
Key
01Microsoft Defender for IoT21%
02Claroty xDome19%
Claroty xDome19%03Nozomi Networks Guardian10%
Nozomi Networks Guardian10%04Fortinet OT Security Platform8%
Fortinet OT Security Platform8%05Armis Centrix6%
Armis Centrix6%06Tenable OT Security4%
Tenable OT Security4%07Dragos Platform2%
Dragos Platform2%08Palo Alto Networks2%
Palo Alto Networks2%09Forescout Vistaro Platform0%
Forescout Vistaro Platform0%What they warned about
Zero of fourteen models held their first choice under the paraphrase. Claude Haiku 4.5, GPT-5.4 mini, Gemini 3.5 Flash, Perplexity Sonar, Grok 4.1 Fast, Mistral Small, DeepSeek V4 Flash, Llama 4 Maverick, Qwen 3.7 Flash, Kimi K2, GLM 4.7 FlashX, MiniMax M2.5, GPT-6 Luna and Muse Glimmer 30B changed. A high negative share on a product with few labels is a warning. A low share on a product with many labels is salience, not sentiment.
Claroty xDome19%
11 of 59 labels negative · 9 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“What to avoid on a tight budget: **Claroty, Nozomi Networks, and Dragos**” DeepSeek V4 Flash, budget prompt
Dragos Platform26%
12 of 46 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 2 hard negative
“What to Avoid (for Mid-Market) ... Premium pricing (~$100K+/year for single site) and complex deployments.” Kimi K2, direct prompt
Microsoft Defender for IoT
21%
9 of 42 labels negative · 6 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid if budget is tight:** **Nozomi Networks** and **Microsoft Defender for IoT**” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
Nozomi Networks Guardian13%
6 of 46 labels negative · 5 of 14 models · 1 hard negative
“Avoid if budget is tight:** **Nozomi Networks**” Perplexity Sonar, budget prompt
What they cite
Citations exist only for the models that return a source list: fourteen of the fourteen in this edition, and all six flagship models on the expanded tier.
Sites the answers cite
77 of 84 answers in this category came back with a source list, from 14 of 14 models: citations where the model returns them, or the search results it consulted. 1122 links across 269 sites, every framing counted. Ranked by the number of answers carrying the site or page. None of the 252 answers across every segment cited this index's own page for the category.
38 answers · 38 citations · 12 models
vendor site · NetWitness32 answers · 39 citations · 11 models
vendor site · SourceForge29 answers · 53 citations · 9 models
27 answers · 38 citations · 11 models
vendor site · G227 answers · 36 citations · 13 models
26 answers · 27 citations · 12 models
vendor site · FitGap23 answers · 28 citations · 9 models
23 answers · 23 citations · 9 models
vendor site · Fortinet21 answers · 29 citations · 11 models
vendor site · Elisity20 answers · 20 citations · 10 models
19 answers · 19 citations · 11 models
17 answers · 21 citations · 10 models
Pages the answers cite
The ten pages named in the most answers, by full address. A page here is one the models returned with a recommendation, not one the index endorses.
38 answers · 12 models
29 answers · 11 models
24 answers · 11 models
23 answers · 9 models
20 answers · 10 models
18 answers · 11 models
17 answers · 9 models
16 answers · 7 models
14 answers · 9 models
13 answers · 8 models
Search against answers
Each company's standing in the answers beside its site's footprint in Google search, one row a site: the products the models named on it with their shares, and the share they add up to; monthly searches on Google, and DataForSEO's estimate of AI search demand (modeled from search signals, directional, not a count of queries to any assistant), for the most-searched of the company's and its products' names (the name is in each row's hover text); estimated monthly organic visits to the site; and its best position in Google's top ten for “best ot security platform”, “ot and iot security platforms”, “ot security platform”. US estimates from DataForSEO and Google's Ads Transparency Center. A small company's site, or a mid-sized company's site for its flagship, is marked company; a product on a large parent's site (Google, Microsoft) has no site figures. A column with no figures for this category is left out, and an empty cell means none were seen, not none exist. Two measurements side by side: neither is read as the cause of the other.
| Company and products | Share | Own site cited | Name searches, Google | AI search demand, est. | Organic visits | Paid search a month, est. | Google ads, last 30 days | Best Google position |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Microsoft parent site Microsoft Defender for IoT 21% | 21% | 133 | 2,240,000 | 403,136 | ||||
| Claroty xDome claroty.com | 19% | 159 | 170 | 3 | 4,901 | 14 | ||
| Nozomi Networks Vantage nozominetworks.com Nozomi Networks Guardian 10%, Nozomi Networks Vantage 2% | 12% | 133 | 20 | 0 | 3,643 | 25 | ||
| Fortinet parent site Fortinet OT Security Platform 8% | 8% | 66 | 49,500 | 2,339 | ||||
| Armis Centrix armis.com | 6% | 104 | 170 | 2 | 197,925 | $2,192 | 12 | |
| Radiflow360 | 6% | |||||||
| Tenable parent site Tenable OT Security 4% | 4% | 62 | 27,100 | 1,194 | ||||
| Acreto acreto.io | 4% | 17 | 90 | 0 | 4 | |||
| Dragos Platform dragos.com | 2% | 128 | 70 | 2 | 9,960 | 0 | ||
| Palo Alto paloaltonetworks.com Palo Alto Networks 2% | 2% | 149 | 246,000 | 18,254 | 951,391 company | $383 | 106 | 1 |
Google's top ten for the three searches hold 21 sites; 6 of them are among the sites the models cited here (elisity.com, fortinet.com, g2.com, gartner.com, netwitness.com, networkintelligence.ai). The first result for “best ot security platform” is fortinet.com.
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.ShowHide
How they answered
Six framings of the same buying question, each sent to every model in a fresh session with search on. One row per model, so a row shows whether it held its answer under rewording, what it named when cost was the constraint, and what it argued against. Computed from the raw judge labels.
ShowHideModelDirect“What is the best OT security platform for a mid-market B2B company?”Paraphrase“Which industrial and IoT device security tool would you recommend to a mid-sized B2B company?”Comparative“What are the top OT and IoT security platforms and how do they differ?”Budget-constrained“What is the best OT security platform for a company with a limited budget?”Scale-constrained“We are a 500 person company evaluating a OT security platform. What should we look at?”Negative“Which OT and IoT security platforms should I avoid or be cautious about?”
Claude Haiku 4.5Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianArmis CentrixChangedno first choiceFortinet OT Security Platformno first choicenothing named
Four alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto Networks, Tenable OT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Asimily, CISA MalcolmGPT-5.4 miniClaroty xDomeSiemens SINEC Security Monitor + SINEC Security GuardChangedClaroty xDomeCisco Cyber Visionno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos PlatformThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable One OT ExposureFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityOne alternative
Fortinet OT Security PlatformGemini 3.5 FlashFortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoTClaroty xDomeChangedClaroty xDomeFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianClaroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardianagainst: Dragos Platformagainst: Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Malcolm, Microsoft Defender for IoT, RadiflowTwo alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto NetworksPerplexity SonarRadiflow360Forescout IoT SecurityChangedno first choiceAcretoagainst: Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, CrowdStrike, Forcepoint, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Ordr, Palo Alto Networks IoT Security
Four alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Palo Alto NetworksFour alternatives
Cisco Cyber Vision, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, QuarkLinkOne alternative
DispelGrok 4.1 FastClaroty xDomeNozomi Networks GuardianChangedagainst: AWS IoT Device Defender, Microsoft Defender for IoTClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi, Tenable OT Securityno first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, Forcepoint, Forescout eyeInspect, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT, Tenable OT Security
Four alternatives
Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto NetworksTwo alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformSix alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Azure Sphere, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianFour alternatives
Acreto, GRFICS/PLC Analysis, ICS/IoT/OT Hardening Framework, OT Sentinel RulesMistral SmallDragos PlatformNozomi Networks GuardianChangedno first choiceAcreto, Tenable OT Securityno first choiceagainst: Forcepoint, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT Security, Tenable OT Security
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianOne alternative
AWS IoT Device DefenderOne alternative
Fortiphyd Open SourceDeepSeek V4 FlashClaroty xDomeagainst: Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedClaroty xDome, Dragos PlatformTenable OT Securityagainst: Acreto, Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomino first choiceagainst: Armis Centrix, CrowdStrike, Defender for IoT, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT Security, Splunk
Three alternatives
Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT SecurityThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianFive alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco Cyber Vision, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto NetworksFour alternatives
GRASSMARLIN, Tenable One, Wazuh, ZeekLlama 4 MaverickPalo Alto NetworksSternumChangedno first choiceno first choiceno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, ForcepointFour alternatives
Claroty xDome, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks IoT/OT SecurityQwen 3.7 FlashIndustrial AIClaroty xDomeChangedClaroty xDomeNmap, Suricataagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, OpenVASno first choiceagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoT, Splunkagainst: Microsoft Defender for IoT, Ordr, Palo Alto Networks, Rhebo, Tenable OT Security
Three alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable.io OTFour alternatives
Armis Platform, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecuritySix alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks, Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSIAM, Tenable OT SecurityFive alternatives
Rapid7 InsightVM, Tenable Vulnerability Management, TheHive, Wazuh, ZeekKimi K2Armis Centrix, Claroty xDomeagainst: Dragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformClaroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks Guardianno first choiceagainst: Bently Nevada, CODESYS Runtime, Emerson, Festo Automation Controllers, Honeywell, JTEKT, Motorola, Omron, Phoenix Contact, Ruijie Networks, Siemens, Yokogawa
Three alternatives
Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Armis Centrix, Nozomi Networks GuardianEight alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Forescout Vistaro Platform, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Palo Alto Networks, Tenable OT SecurityFour alternatives
Acreto, GRASSMARLIN, Security Onion, Tenable OT SecurityGLM 4.7 FlashXFortinet OT Security Platformagainst: Claroty xDomeMicrosoft Defender for IoTChangedno first choiceMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choicenothing named
Two alternatives
Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianTwo alternatives
Forescout Vistaro Platform, Nozomi Networks VantageTwo alternatives
Acreto, OT Sentinel RulesMiniMax M2.5Radiflow360Armis CentrixChangedDragos PlatformMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Delta Electronics, Maples Systems/Weintek, Rockwell Automation, Schneider Electric, Siemens
Four alternatives
Armis Centrix, Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Tenable OT SecurityFive alternatives
Forescout Vistaro Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Nozomi Networks Guardian, Ordr, Palo Alto Networks IoT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Fortinet OT Security Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Acreto, Dispel, Tenable One OT ExposureGPT-6 LunaNozomi Networks VantageClaroty xDomeChangedClaroty xDome, Dragos Platform, Nozomi Networks GuardianMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Claroty xDome, Microsoft Defender for IoT
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformOne alternative
Nozomi VantageFive alternatives
Armis Centrix, Cisco Cyber Vision, Forescout eyeInspect, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Palo Alto Networks Industrial OT SecurityThree alternatives
Claroty xDome, Dragos Platform, NozomiMuse Glimmer 30BRadiflow360Nozomi Networks GuardianChangedagainst: Claroty xDome, Dragos PlatformClaroty xDomeagainst: CrowdStrikeMicrosoft Defender for IoTno first choiceagainst: Nozomi Networks Guardian
Two alternatives
Claroty xDome, Nozomi Networks GuardianThree alternatives
Armis Centrix, Microsoft Defender for IoT, Tenable OT SecurityFour alternatives
Armis Centrix, Dragos Platform, Microsoft Defender for IoT, NozomiOne alternative
AcretoBold is the first choiceAlternatives are counted; the count opens them.What the answer argued against
The record
One row per call: the version string exactly as returned, whether the model searched, sources cited, and latency. Full answer text is in the free responses file. Download the record
Eighty-four rows: every prompt, every model, every answer.
| Prompt | Model | Version string | Time (UTC) | Searched | Sources | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Direct recommendation | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 18 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Direct recommendation | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:04 | yes | 18 | 25 s |
| Direct recommendation | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 18 | 4 s |
| Direct recommendation | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 22 | 9 s |
| Direct recommendation | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:27 | yes | 11 | 7 s |
| Direct recommendation | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:28 | yes | 23 | 48 s |
| Direct recommendation | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:31 | yes | 5 | 3 s |
| Direct recommendation | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:37 | no | 0 | 29 s |
| Direct recommendation | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 11 | 49 s |
| Direct recommendation | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:58 | yes | 21 | 43 s |
| Direct recommendation | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-04 23:41 | yes | 9 | 16 s |
| Direct recommendation | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 01:32 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Direct recommendation | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:17 | yes | 13 | 15 s |
| Paraphrase | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:27 | yes | 17 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 4 | 5 s |
| Paraphrase | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:25 | yes | 13 | 24 s |
| Paraphrase | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 00:41 | yes | 17 | 3 s |
| Paraphrase | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 23 | 9 s |
| Paraphrase | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 8 | 8 s |
| Paraphrase | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:48 | yes | 25 | 42 s |
| Paraphrase | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:50 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Paraphrase | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:55 | no | 0 | 27 s |
| Paraphrase | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-04 22:18 | yes | 15 | 39 s |
| Paraphrase | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:52 | yes | 24 | 25 s |
| Paraphrase | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 5 | 41 s |
| Paraphrase | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:54 | yes | 3 | 16 s |
| Paraphrase | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 00:43 | yes | 15 | 17 s |
| Comparative | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-04 22:45 | yes | 18 | 10 s |
| Comparative | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 7 | 10 s |
| Comparative | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:14 | yes | 12 | 26 s |
| Comparative | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:40 | yes | 20 | 5 s |
| Comparative | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:01 | yes | 24 | 9 s |
| Comparative | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:56 | yes | 15 | 7 s |
| Comparative | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:25 | yes | 22 | 59 s |
| Comparative | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-04 22:10 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Comparative | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:34 | yes | 10 | 34 s |
| Comparative | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 25 | 31 s |
| Comparative | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-04 22:54 | yes | 24 | 87 s |
| Comparative | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:18 | yes | 13 | 27 s |
| Comparative | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 9 | 30 s |
| Comparative | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:30 | yes | 25 | 35 s |
| Budget constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 00:21 | yes | 5 | 6 s |
| Budget constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 01:23 | yes | 23 | 25 s |
| Budget constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 14 | 5 s |
| Budget constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 00:53 | yes | 24 | 10 s |
| Budget constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-04 22:40 | yes | 14 | 7 s |
| Budget constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 23 | 36 s |
| Budget constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:26 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Budget constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 00:14 | no | 0 | 28 s |
| Budget constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:22 | yes | 20 | 21 s |
| Budget constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:06 | yes | 21 | 34 s |
| Budget constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 01:34 | yes | 8 | 24 s |
| Budget constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:46 | yes | 4 | 15 s |
| Budget constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 20 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 00:21 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-05 01:40 | no | 0 | 6 s |
| Scale constrained | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:18 | yes | 12 | 28 s |
| Scale constrained | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:16 | yes | 20 | 8 s |
| Scale constrained | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:31 | yes | 19 | 11 s |
| Scale constrained | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 01:01 | no | 0 | 10 s |
| Scale constrained | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 01:05 | yes | 20 | 45 s |
| Scale constrained | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 01:12 | yes | 5 | 4 s |
| Scale constrained | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-05 01:18 | no | 0 | 26 s |
| Scale constrained | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 00:20 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Scale constrained | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 00:04 | yes | 14 | 65 s |
| Scale constrained | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 5 | 12 s |
| Scale constrained | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-05 00:17 | yes | 2 | 22 s |
| Scale constrained | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-04 22:43 | yes | 12 | 23 s |
| Negative framing | Claude Haiku 4.5 | claude-haiku-4-5-20251001 | 2026-10-05 01:10 | yes | 18 | 8 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-5.4 mini | gpt-5.4-mini-2026-03-17 | 2026-10-04 23:15 | yes | 2 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | Gemini 3.5 Flash | gemini-3.5-flash | 2026-10-05 00:15 | yes | 13 | 26 s |
| Negative framing | Perplexity Sonar | sonar | 2026-10-05 01:07 | yes | 20 | 6 s |
| Negative framing | Grok 4.1 Fast | spacexai/grok-4.1-fast-non-reasoning via vertex | 2026-10-05 01:00 | yes | 25 | 11 s |
| Negative framing | Mistral Small | mistral/mistral-small via mistral | 2026-10-05 00:43 | yes | 5 | 5 s |
| Negative framing | DeepSeek V4 Flash | deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash via deepinfra | 2026-10-05 00:19 | yes | 25 | 70 s |
| Negative framing | Llama 4 Maverick | meta/llama-4-maverick via bedrock | 2026-10-05 00:34 | yes | 5 | 2 s |
| Negative framing | Qwen 3.7 Flash | alibaba/qwen3.7-flash via alibaba | 2026-10-04 23:51 | yes | 9 | 38 s |
| Negative framing | Kimi K2 | moonshotai/kimi-k2 via novita | 2026-10-05 01:39 | yes | 24 | 27 s |
| Negative framing | GLM 4.7 FlashX | zai/glm-4.7-flashx via zai | 2026-10-05 01:53 | yes | 25 | 22 s |
| Negative framing | MiniMax M2.5 | minimax/minimax-m2.5 via minimax | 2026-10-05 00:35 | yes | 16 | 34 s |
| Negative framing | GPT-6 Luna | gpt-6-luna | 2026-10-04 23:57 | yes | 3 | 21 s |
| Negative framing | Muse Glimmer 30B | meta/muse-glimmer-30b via togetherai | 2026-10-05 01:22 | yes | 23 | 29 s |
Normalization in this category
Every judgment call made between the raw labels and the numbers above, listed so it is visible and reversible.
ShowHide
Category-scoped readings
Armis read as Armis Centrix
Armis (Armis Centrix) read as Armis Centrix
Claroty read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome / CTD) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty (xDome) read as Claroty xDome
Claroty Platform read as Claroty xDome
Dragos read as Dragos Platform
Forescout read as Forescout Vistaro Platform
Fortinet read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiGate Rugged + FortiGuard OT) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiOS OT Security Fabric) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Fortinet (FortiOT) read as Fortinet OT Security Platform
Microsoft read as Microsoft Defender for IoT
Microsoft (Sentinel on Stack) read as Microsoft Defender for IoT
Nozomi Networks read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian + Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Guardian) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks (with Vantage) read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Nozomi Networks Platform read as Nozomi Networks Guardian
Palo Alto read as Palo Alto Networks
Tenable read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable (Tenable OT Exposure) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable OT read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot (formerly Armis) read as Tenable OT Security
Tenable.ot (formerly Indusoft) read as Tenable OT Security
Unresolved, counted raw
Armis Platform
Armor OT Security
Azure Sphere
Bently Nevada
CIS Controls (Basic)
CISA Malcolm
CODESYS Runtime
Defender for IoT (Microsoft)
Emerson
Festo Automation Controllers
Forcepoint OT
Forescout IoT Security
Fortinet FortiOS OT Security Fabric
Fortinet OT (e.g., FortiGate Rugged)
Fortiphyd Open Source
GREYCORTEX Mendel
GRFICS/PLC Analysis (Fortiphyd projects)
ICS/IoT/OT Hardening Framework (GitHub: SiteQ8)
ICSForge
Industrial AI
JTEKT
Maples Systems/Weintek
ModbusPal
Motorola
Nozomi Vantage
Omron
Phoenix Contact
QuarkLink
Rhebo
Ruijie Networks
Shieldworkz OT Security Platform
Siemens SINEC Security Monitor + SINEC Security Guard
Sophos SD-RED
Sternum
Tenable.io OT
Thales Group Luna HSM/KMaaS
Yokogawa
pymodbus
snap7
Discontinued, still offered
No shut-down product was recommended here.